Point taken, but those odds are better than trying to defend yourself against a crazy person wielding a gun.
But only if I have a gun.
Point taken, but those odds are better than trying to defend yourself against a crazy person wielding a gun.
Again, this is not a reasonable argument. It doesn't mean you do nothing to deter it from happening.
The fact that the White House and the governor of Virginia are using this incident as means to push their political agenda of gun control is sickening and is a slap in the face to the families of the victims.
Whether you believe gun control is needed or not, now is not the time to bring it up publicly, in my opinion.
Nope. If I'm unarmed, my odds are better against someone with a knife than against someone with a gun. Same if I only have a baseball bat, etc.But only if I have a gun.
Yes, YOUR odds are better if YOU have a gun but that's the kind of thinking that perpetuates the problem.
But at the same time ensures they're not actually safe at school, at church, at the movies, or anywhere else. Quite a conundrum.It's also the kind of thinking that keeps me and my family safe.
But at the same time ensures they're not actually safe at school, at church, at the movies, or anywhere else. Quite a conundrum.
It's not a fact. It's an illusion. You could be sitting at church or in the movies when some deranged lunatic starts spraying bullets everywhere and you'll all be dead before you even have a chance to respond.'tis indeed. But if nothing else, I can take comfort in the fact that I have a bit of control sometimes. That beats no control anytime.
It's not a fact. It's an illusion. You could be sitting at church or in the movies when some deranged lunatic starts spraying bullets everywhere and you'll all be dead before you even have a chance to respond.
More drivel from the horse-hockey infused Euro-Socialist.Requiring a psychiatric evaluation to get a license to buy guns seems like common sense to me. As long as you're a sane person I don't have a problem with anyone owning a freaking Barret .50cal. Just invite me over to shoot it
FFS that's asinine. Obama didn't make this guy do what he did, any more than the flag made the Charleston shooter do it. Let's stop pointing fingers anywhere but the one place they belong - which is squarely on the actual perpetrators of these crimes.
Then why is Obama and other DEMs pointing the finger away from the shooter and toward the gun? Answer: for political gain.FFS that's asinine. Obama didn't make this guy do what he did, any more than the flag made the Charleston shooter do it. Let's stop pointing fingers anywhere but the one place they belong - which is squarely on the actual perpetrators of these crimes.
More drivel from the horse-hockey infused Euro-Socialist.
I thought I stated pretty clearly that I disagree with reassigning blame in either case. But have fun jousting with those strawmen.
That's kind of where I am, too. Except I already have a gun in the house. It's not loaded, or handy, so it would be pretty ineffectual unless I had a couple minutes' advance notice. I imagine the same is true for most people, so maybe it's time to start carrying them everywhere.The world is a nasty place these days. I vascilate between wanting to ban all handguns to wanting to just get one of my own.
More drivel from the horse-hockey infused Euro-Socialist.
Before I acquired my conceal carry permit, I could purchase an illegal pistol much easier than a legal one. The problem with the government monitoring us and determining who can purchase, how soon till it bleeds into other areas. I don't trust them simply because the model citizens would suffer. There is nothing we can do about these peoe doing these things. They are a product of the times. Maybe we need a big island loaded with weapons so rasist can go settle their differences.
No kidding. Like an evaluation would make a difference. With people that think like boy no wonder we are so screwed up.
If you knew anything whatsoever about psychology you would know it's actually not that difficult to spot people with psychotic or violently anti-social tendencies. A simple mirror would probably work in your case. Will an examination catch 100% of the crazies? No. Is that valid argument against an examination? Not even close.
There isn't even a requirement to demonstrate you know gun safety to buy a gun in SC. Yet you have to take a test, and demonstrate you can safely operate a vehicle to get a driver's license...
There are millions that have a DL and can't drive. It's proven every day.
So we should do away with all regulations and let anyone drive who can afford to buy a car?
No I would not be opposed to safety test but would do no good. And would be fine with people carrying. I do. And I guarantee you crime would decrease. We just disagree. Frankly I don't know what we would agree on except UNC. Maybe I'm wrong???
I'm quite sure you can't purchase a pistol that easy. In NC it requires a permit unless it's a private sale. Shotguns and rifles are a different storyNonsense. Idk where you live but in SC you can buy a gun in a private sale without filing a single piece of paperwork, and without any kind of background check. If that's more difficult than locating an illegal arms dealer then we obviously operate in very different social circles...
Yes, I do. But, all that really matters in this context is that 'boy = socialist => that's all that matters.Precisely what about that policy could be deemed socialist? Do you know what the word socialist means? Do you even know what Euro is short for? Frankly I'm surprised you can even find the power button to a computer, much less access the internet...
Why are you so worried about psychological evaluations? Scared you'll fail?
Defaulting on credit cards isn't a crime either but we have systems in place to stop that person from purchasing a house, correct?
You know, I don't know specifically how it could be accomplished, but like it or not, we are all tracked, even if no one admits it. Google, Apple, Facebook, Verizon, AT&T, Comcast, Charter...you name it, and every single major outlet like these can - AND DO - track everywhere a device "goes" - both physically in some cases (i.e.: cell phones) and digitally (via IP address, etc). You simply cannot tell me that there is not a way for our Government to intervene here and blacklist certain individuals who are known to have a pattern to their behaviors.
The only ones I could make a case for as far as not being able to track would be people who are literally hobbits and don't use phones or computers. Everyone else - I hate to break the news, but we're tracked. It can be done.