And what I'm saying is that that the graphic is not accurate (which I know you didn't post). And, I am in fact, calm.
If the graphic is only referencing the reporting year of 2015, it should include the eligible years included in said reporting year. That's just common sense. But a poster posting that graphic, once again, is showing something that is A) Misleading and B) Could potentially if widespread be damaging to our institution, which I take issue with as we've had enough of that in the last six years.
If that doesn't make sense to a fellow Heel, I don't know what else to say.