...and this will be extremely quick, as I am out of patience for this whole process.
With the caveat that asking for a win tonight was gonna be tough on a good day --- Clemson is arguably (and I think are) the best team in the ACC, and they have size and strength, and when they can get away with crawling your back, or have guys throwing in fall-away 30 footers (whether or not they hit the rim 2 or 3 times), there's only so much you can do about that...
BUT, with that said, why would you lay back and play into their hands?
So, yeah, I had several notes, and I could ream a lotta guys for a lotta things (including giving Clemson myriad wide-open looks), but I'm tired of barking at the burglars only to have them let in the house --- so, if you want a sum-up in micrcosm, it's in the next paragraph:
- Early on when the game was competitive, we came out of a timeout with 44 and got a TO --- didn't even hafta force that one, as they fumbled one away just from being sped up --- but y'know, that's one reason you scramble. Then, seemingly eons later (with just 6 over minutes to go in the damn GAME), we start scrambling again --- and lo and behold, we forced 5 TOs and an inbounds timeout in pretty short order. But, by then the deficit was too big to erase.
So yeah, I would just love for anyone on the staff to sit down with me, and explain to me like I've never seen a basketball before, why it wasn't a good idea to do that again --- not even once --- during the 30+ minutes in between? Or, speaking of timeouts, why it wasn't a good idea to maybe use one of those when the game was on the verge of getting away in the 1st half?
Again, getting a W down there this time was gonna be a tough ask... BUT, it's NOT too much to ask that we put forth our best approach to try...
With the caveat that asking for a win tonight was gonna be tough on a good day --- Clemson is arguably (and I think are) the best team in the ACC, and they have size and strength, and when they can get away with crawling your back, or have guys throwing in fall-away 30 footers (whether or not they hit the rim 2 or 3 times), there's only so much you can do about that...
BUT, with that said, why would you lay back and play into their hands?
So, yeah, I had several notes, and I could ream a lotta guys for a lotta things (including giving Clemson myriad wide-open looks), but I'm tired of barking at the burglars only to have them let in the house --- so, if you want a sum-up in micrcosm, it's in the next paragraph:
- Early on when the game was competitive, we came out of a timeout with 44 and got a TO --- didn't even hafta force that one, as they fumbled one away just from being sped up --- but y'know, that's one reason you scramble. Then, seemingly eons later (with just 6 over minutes to go in the damn GAME), we start scrambling again --- and lo and behold, we forced 5 TOs and an inbounds timeout in pretty short order. But, by then the deficit was too big to erase.
So yeah, I would just love for anyone on the staff to sit down with me, and explain to me like I've never seen a basketball before, why it wasn't a good idea to do that again --- not even once --- during the 30+ minutes in between? Or, speaking of timeouts, why it wasn't a good idea to maybe use one of those when the game was on the verge of getting away in the 1st half?
Again, getting a W down there this time was gonna be a tough ask... BUT, it's NOT too much to ask that we put forth our best approach to try...