Same. Hey, sometimes you just gotta go where you go, and do what you do.Weirdest thing I’ll admit to is believing that what I do or wear or whatever somehow influences how the Heels play. I realize it makes no sense but I’ll still move to a different seat during a game if we’re screwing up or stay where I am if we’re winning. Stupid, I know, but that doesn’t mean I’ll stop doing it.
I’m with ya. It frustrates me to no end to lose to dook but if it’s at cameron with the rat f-bombing the refs into submission, and seeing and hearing those twinkle-fingered nerds with their cheer sheets ... it really pisses me off. So it’s best for me to record it and watch if we win; delete if we lose.
Are you saying you believe in miracles? Or you calling RH, a sexy thing?
Well, strum, I expected a response from you to my last post in this thread by now. Either something along the lines of "I'll be damn, I suppose there wasn't anything blatantly sinister behind Jack Ruby's actions after all" or a show of utter doubt. So which is it?
Well, I'm sorry. I didn't really read what you copied and pasted. I haven't read the full Warren Report and I don't plan to anytime soon. It's really not worth debating because, frankly, I don't give a shit who shot the man.
Copied and pasted?! Go f-ck yourself.
Oh, and was that "your tutorial?" It wasn't "beyond my abilities of comprehension" because, as I said, I didn't take the time to even try to read it. Were you writing-out what the Warren Commission Report said? If that's what you were doing, then what's "right" about that? That's you repeating something you trust is the truth. Yay! As I said, for the 3rd time now; If you trust the WCR as the truth... great! It doesn't make you, or them, right or wrong. It means you trust their story.
Why wouldn't you take time to read it? Are you afraid of learning something? Maybe you forgot to fill your Adderall prescription this month? It was essentially five short paragraphs, concise enough that a middle schooler could ingest it in under a minute. I always read your somewhat long-winded posts when you're going on about the imminent demise of American football. I don't agree with your argument but at least my brain isn't too lazy to dip into a good dose of strumabsurdity.
That's a pretty good analogy, raider. Strum is like a 90-year-old Grandpa Grunt who has no business owning a driver's license, tooling down the highway and crossing back and forth between lanes while swearing at every other driver on the road.
I'm relieved that you're finally trusting the Trump administration now. I was worried about you.
Neither do I. Especially the weather. They get that wrong a lot.
You specifically wrote I make it a rule to never trust what "the government" tells me. There is a significant difference between sometimes and never.
I never trust "the government" when it comes to entities like the FBI, the CIA, and the major parties. Those institutions have agendas. They have to maintain their control and stay relevant, no matter the cost. They do just as much harm as they do good, in my opinion. I'm trying to pinpoint the PARTICULAR factions of government that I would never trust. When I hear "the Weather", I don't consider that "the government."
What about the Supreme Court? Do you trust their integrity and authority?
I trust that they are doing what they believe is right, or best, or whatever. I also believe they are just as prone to the same pitfalls of people in power. I like to believe they're doing their best. I like to believe that everyone is doing their best. However, when you get put into (or, especially when you seek-out) places of power, it gets much harder. And, their power and influence is a target for being bought.
There's more money, in general, on people being sick than people being healthy. It's a stacked-deck when the motivation is already in the direction of "wanting" people to be unhealthy.
You trust they are doing their best, but then you lose faith and would only like to believe as much. Then you acknowledge they are prone to corruption, then conclude their judgments in America's highest court are up for sale.
I've never bought into this conspiratorial theory, at least not on any widespread level. First, as we all know there is more than one form of cancer, with a multitude of different treatments and different cures. So saying "a cure for cancer" is a bit overly simplistic.
It depends on if I am coming or going. I usually know then. Your knowing what I'm doing isn't really of much interest to me.
