These the same guys that projected Hillary to beat Trump by 70 electoral votes and have an ~80% chance of winning?
I feel like I could make some good coin betting against their political projections.
I can confirm this is a good strategy.
These the same guys that projected Hillary to beat Trump by 70 electoral votes and have an ~80% chance of winning?
I feel like I could make some good coin betting against their political projections.
![]()
I won a $100 bet that there were no tapes. It's not that hard to truly read this asshole, even if he does like to enjoy his little playground games, all the while eroding any credibility he has ever accrued.
Thank you, Fat Lazy Slob . .
You must know some fools if you got someone to take that bet.
However why not let it ride on the bet I proposed above?
I'm considering it . . and yeah, I'm real fvcking scared. Terrified actually . .
![]()
I won a $100 bet that there were no tapes. It's not that hard to truly read this asshole, even if he does like to enjoy his little playground games, all the while eroding any credibility he has ever accrued.
Thank you, Fat Lazy Slob . .
NSA has surveillance recordings of both the phone conversations AND any and all communications held within the Oval Office. The recordings exist. Comey knows that. That is why he was forced to confirm under oath what Trump claimed and what Comey had told the Gang of Eight - that Trump was never under FBI investigation.![]()
I won a $100 bet that there were no tapes. It's not that hard to truly read this asshole, even if he does like to enjoy his little playground games, all the while eroding any credibility he has ever accrued.
Thank you, Fat Lazy Slob . .
Looks like CNN got caught on another undercover video admitting that Trump-Russia story is a farce designed to drive ratings and that the prez is correct in calling it a witch hunt.
Smart move not to bet Billy.
I repeat..."Keep gnawing that Russia bone, Dims. Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain."
What a bunch of dumb arses.
Here's a link I know you will love, @BillyL
FBI Clears Your Boy Mike Flynn. Enjoy
http://nypost.com/2017/01/24/fbi-clears-michael-flynn-in-probe-linking-him-to-russia/
If, he was clean in everything he has done in the past 5 years, I doubt he'd be requesting immunity.
Good news for all of us here . . SI Mueller will have this wrapped up in no time.
What a relief for our nation. It's good to know we can finally put this to rest and move on.
If, he was clean in everything he has done in the past 5 years, I doubt he'd be requesting immunity.
Good news for all of us here . . SI Mueller will have this wrapped up in no time.
What a relief for our nation. It's good to know we can finally put this to rest and move on.
We thing we should not forget about General Flynn, is that the man was stoopid enough to tell a bold faced LIE to his employer and that that act of dishonesty cost him his job. The man just doesn't seem like a real bright fellow to me, nor does the guy that placed him there in the WH.[/QUOTE
And Loretta Lynch and slick Willy were talking about grandkids on the tarmac, smdh.
Probably CNNOr he's not requesting immunity. Do you have a link to a credible source that Flynn is requesting immunity?
We thing we should not forget about General Flynn, is that the man was stoopid enough to tell a bold faced LIE to his employer and that that act of dishonesty cost him his job. The man just doesn't seem like a real bright fellow to me, nor does the guy that placed him there in the WH.
I have asked and asked and asked and asked and asked my lib friends for an answer to this..along with the Hillary and Russia Uranium deal, obama giving cash to Iran deal, Holder and Operation Fast and Furious..and the list goes on and on and on......for some reason, all they do is ignore the question and tell me how they hate T-Rump and how he is going to be impeached and yada yada yada....All Lib talking points that don't mean nothing or apply to anything! You would think by now they would get tired of all of the losing......So Flynn lies during an interview whereas Obama's AG, Loretta Lynch, tells the FBI Director to lie to the American people.
Why exactly doesn't Lynch bother you? Or if you prefer, why do you choose to keep going on about Flynn (who was fired when his transgression was revealed) and ignore Loretta?
We thing we should not forget about General Flynn, is that the man was stoopid enough to tell a bold faced LIE to his employer and that that act of dishonesty cost him his job. The man just doesn't seem like a real bright fellow to me, nor does the guy that placed him there in the WH.
For the first time since Trump won the election, there is not one story on CNN's website about Russia. Go see for yourself.
Wonder what happened to cause the change?
Both parties need to leave healthcare alone. Dems screwed it up and now so will Reps. I don't want gov anywhere near my healthcare.The tax relief for those that are wealthy Health Care Bill . . ?
The tax relief for those that are wealthy Health Care Bill . . ?
The tax relief for those that are wealthy Health Care Bill . . ?
But I thought Obamacare was an amazing success. CNN said it was and so did schumer and pelosi.I actually prefer that to the Dims "Free Health Care for Illegal Immigrants" plan that we currently labor under.
Both parties need to leave healthcare alone. Dems screwed it up and now so will Reps. I don't want gov anywhere near my healthcare.
A quick search reveals that Mueller's law firm also represents Ivanka Trump, Jared Kushner, and Paul Manafort. The people closest to Trump obviously believe that attorneys can be impartial when practicing law. To follow your criticism through to its logical conclusion, no prosecutor who has ever held a political opinion would be allowed to prosecute anybody who held a conflicting political opinion.99.8% of all donations from Mueller's law firm went to Hillary.
He has not hired one single attorney for this investigation who donated to Trump.
It's ALL about politics.
My position is that I'm not an attorney, and neither are you as evidenced by your attempt to compare a traffic violation to a criminal (or is it civil?) offense. My position is that Comey must have referenced intent because there was some legal significance to it. My position is that Comey only had the power to recommend a DOJ investigation, yet none of the imminently qualified attorneys at the DOJ sought prosecution either. I'm going to rely on the experts here, knowing that politics played a role in the decision without suggesting it played the only role.Because Comey referenced "intent" when discussing Hillary's transgressions.
That's like telling a cop that I didn't intend to speed and that being an adequate reason to not convict me of speeding.
Your position seems to be that the DOJ is above reproach and that by its very nature, must be impartial.
Tag didn't work but thanks anyway. I'm not worrying, just waiting for Mr. Mueller to put this thing to bed. I'm tired of hearing about it.ETA- gonna go ahead and tag @Raising Heel on this so he can finally quit worrying about Trump and the Rooskies.
What the hell are you talking about? The Democrats have a perfectly coherent platform. It revolves around determining whether Trump passed gas in the Rose Garden. And identity politics. And how they've lost the presidency, the Senate, and thousands of local races because of gerrymandering. And how it's all Russia's fault that Hillary was the most unrelatable candidate possible. And how...Good stuff. Keeps the dims focused on Russia and spending all their time and energy "resisting" Trump. When those mid-terms roll around they will have no plan or platform to offer the American people other than their anti-Trump blathering. Their party is in chaos and they're too outraged over losing the presidency to "that man" and his rhetoric to regroup and actually form a coherent argument. In their all-out effort to derail his administration they're unwittingly strengthening the GOP's position.