He has to have contributed something unique or made some kind of historical impact.
Are you arguing that South Park has made no impact on cartoon's evolution?
He has to have contributed something unique or made some kind of historical impact.
This is where we'll disagree. Spongebob is a guilty pleasure of mine lol.I can't stand Spongebob
The subject was cartoon characters, not cartoons in general. Stop moving the goal posts and just accept the fact you are wrong.Are you arguing that South Park has made no impact on cartoon's evolution?
That's fine. Everyone has a guilty pleasure.This is where we'll disagree. Spongebob is a guilty pleasure of mine lol.
The subject was cartoon characters, not cartoons in general. Stop moving the goal posts and just accept the fact you are wrong.
Never cared for South Park (maybe it was the voices that annoyed me; IDK) but Archer is fantastic!
South Park has gone so serious and serial.
Did you actually read the article? That was just retards being retards. Had nothing to do with the show.Spongebob, since this is the easiest... I'll just leave this one here...NTTAWWT.
Honestly, it's both. I agree with your assessment of the show's arc:So first South Park was accused of being too "toilety" and then a few poasts later it's accused of being too serious and serial... which is it?
Did you actually read the article? That was just retards being retards. Had nothing to do with the show.
This show was awesome and is a good example of how kids are dumber now + how everything is PC now. There's no way Pinky and the Brain would fly today.
For one, it's too complex of a show -- kids now would be like WTF. And even beyond that, it's way too "dark" for PC-conscious networks to show now.
Except nothing in the show even hints at Spongebob being gay. It's just stupid hate-mongering from religious fanatics.I skimmed it looking for key bullet points, which were covered in the upper half of the article. I've gotten accustomed to multitasking with work and this site, but this thread is testing my limits a bit. I don't have the time to dig for an article that perfectly fits what I was looking for, but the overwhelming belief that I used to hear (granted, this was years ago) was that Spongebob was along the same lines of critique as the Teletubbies. Again, NTTAWWT...except that it's a kids program, which does actually present a problem, for me anyway.
Definitely agree with this, and that's why I prefer the older ones. The newer ones are still good, but it doesn't hold a candle to the older South Park. Plus, I like to go to Hulu and just watch a random South Park episode, and it's harder to do that when they all build off of each other.Current -- serious and serial. By "serial" I mean now they make their episodes build and there's a legit story arc. South Park had never done that before until these past two seasons. It's gotten bland for me. Just go back to where each episode is its own thing and isn't linked to the episode before.
Current -- serious and serial. By "serial" I mean now they make their episodes build and there's a legit story arc. South Park had never done that before until these past two seasons. It's gotten bland for me. Just go back to where each episode is its own thing and isn't linked to the episode before.
Except nothing in the show even hints at Spongebob being gay. It's just stupid hate-mongering from religious fanatics.
I feel qualified to make that statement because I've seen probably 90% of all Spongebob episodes ever made lol![]()
Honestly, it's both. I agree with your assessment of the show's arc:
Beginning -- basically all toilet humor. I actually dislike these episodes a lot. The first ~4-5 seasons of SP are unwatchable for me.
Middle -- show hits its stride and takes on deeper / more subtle comedy in addition to gag comedy and toilet humor. Seasons like 9-17 of SP are hilarious and by far their best work. Brilliant comedy.
Current -- serious and serial. By "serial" I mean now they make their episodes build and there's a legit story arc. South Park had never done that before until these past two seasons. It's gotten bland for me. Just go back to where each episode is its own thing and isn't linked to the episode before.
LOL. This is such a fail post. It once again goes to show you have no understanding of cartoon characters and cartoons in general. Either that or you don't understand the complexities of humor in cartoons.Simpsons are a poor man's South Park. Accept it and move on. Cartman > Bart. Randy Marsh > Homer Simpson. This is just fact. How they made years worth of revenue with "Hmmm, Beer!"..."Doh!"...and fixations on sprinkled donuts if still beyond me. We are a simpleton mass. Take the L, sir.
Simpsons suck.LOL. This is such a fail post. It once again goes to show you have no understanding of cartoon characters and cartoons in general. Either that or you don't understand the complexities of humor in cartoons.
I can agree with this. The last couple seasons have been funny to me, but I don't think they do a great job completing/resolving the longer storylines. So while each episode is still really funny - I feel like they could almost be watched in any order due to the continuity not being great.
I'm not really sure who's foxhole I'm jumping into for this argument, because I've seen people make great points such as South Park being superior to the Simpsons (albeit slightly) and Archer (much more so) - but then follow it up with outlandish statements like SpongeBob sucks. I might be flying in off the top rope on my own team here.
LOL. This is such a fail post. It once again goes to show you have no understanding of cartoon characters and cartoons in general. Either that or you don't understand the complexities of humor in cartoons.
Spongebob is life lol. And I wouldn't unequivocally say Archer is funnier than South Park. When SP is at its best, it's on its own stratosphere of awesomeness.I can agree with this. The last couple seasons have been funny to me, but I don't think they do a great job completing/resolving the longer storylines. So while each episode is still really funny - I feel like they could almost be watched in any order due to the continuity not being great.
I'm not really sure who's foxhole I'm jumping into for this argument, because I've seen people make great points such as South Park being superior to the Simpsons (albeit slightly) and Archer (much more so) - but then follow it up with outlandish statements like SpongeBob sucks. I might be flying in off the top rope on my own team here.
Seriously dude. You should stop. If the only thing you get from the Simpsons is beer and doughnuts then you don't understand the show. I can understand why some people don't see past that though. A lot of their humor requires you to know about history and current events. A lot of millennials don't know that kind of stuff.Or I grew up.
I've already been on radar today.You go to hell
I "get" the material in the Simpsons. I just don't find it laugh-out-loud funny. It's just okay for me, dawg.Seriously dude. You should stop. If the only thing you get from the Simpsons is beer and doughnuts then you don't understand the show. I can understand why some people don't see past that though. A lot of their humor requires you to know about history and current events. A lot of millennials don't know that kind of stuff.
Those are some really good ones. I would also add Rocko to that list. There are some other good ones that I watched (Darkwing Duck, Talespin, Goof Troop), but I wouldn't put them on a best of list.@Hark_The_Sound_2010 some other kickass cartoons from our generation:
- Doug
- Hey! Arnold
- Rugrats
- Rocket Power
- Animaniacs
- Tiny Toons
Forgot about Rocko's Modern Life!! That was a good one. Another cartoon that would not fly today.Those are some really good ones. I would also add Rocko to that list. There are some other good ones that I watched (Darkwing Duck, Talespin, Goof Troop), but I wouldn't put them on a best of list.
That's fine, I can understand that. I feel the same way about South Park, however I do recognize its historical impact and recognize it as one of the better cartoons on TV.I "get" the material in the Simpsons. I just don't find it laugh-out-loud funny. It's just okay for me, dawg.
I "get" the material in the Simpsons. I just don't find it laugh-out-loud funny. It's just okay for me, dawg.
But perhaps this is why Blue doesn't like Archer either. It has a lot of subtle comedy that requires an understanding of language, history, and syntax.
Based off the 10 minutes you watched, right?Oh I understand it just fine. It's just not funny. At all.
Oh I understand it just fine
It's just not funny. At all.
Hello kids. This is what they call a contradiction.
GFY. I watched it religiously as a kid. Again, then I grew up. I just find SP to be a more clever depiction. I think we're looking at the same angle here...our taste in style just varies.Based off the 10 minutes you watched, right?![]()
I thought you were referring to the latter part of my poast you quoted -- about Archer. My mistake Famdo Calrissian.GFY. I watched it religiously as a kid. Again, then I grew up. I just find SP to be a more clever depiction. I think we're looking at the same angle here...our taste in style just varies.