Oh and Fed might feel that
this makes no sense OR you have no idea what our response was to the ANOA. You think she cares enough about our image to ditch Beckman, but doesn't care about our response to the ANOA regarding one of the largest embarrassments in the university's history?
When it is all over, i'm probably going to feel satisfied with the outcome of this NCAA mess and i'm going to give lots of credit to the Folt Administration - a) they are making academic side happy by adding reforms and getting a million investigators (Martin, Wainstein, etc), b) they are doing their best to limit the sanctions by telling the NCAA how to interpret their own rules and calling them out on BS.
Sorry, but I have to respectfully disagree. And I DO know what is in the response because I read it. If you think for one minute Folt or ANYONE on the academic side would have the cajones to tell the NCAA (which, BTW, has NO control over ACADEMICS at ANY university) to go pound sand, then you haven't been paying attention to them at all. The academics at UNC are notorious for hating all things athletic, especially big time college football. The last thing any of them want is a successful UNC football program, which is why they threw football under the bus to try and avoid any digging into the AFAM program.
No, they had almost nothing to do with the response to the NCAA because it had little to do with academics. The NCAA and the response to their inquisition is about athletics. Bubba and the lawyers handled the response. She might have signed off on it, but since the NCAA can't tell UNC what to do with academic programs, she has no reason other than "reputation" and the university's image to even be involved with the response. THAT is why it told the NCAA they could suck eggs. This whole mess was an ACADEMIC issue from the beginning which had barely more than half of the people over the last 20 years taking the classes being athletes. Aside from women's basketball having some serious issues with an employee steering players to crip classes, no other evidence points to anyone telling the players on any team to go take these classes. Why? They didn't have to. Heck, when I was in college EVERYONE knew which classes and professors were the easy A's.
Make no mistake about it, ALL she cares about is the academic side and the school's reputation in the eyes of the press. If football were to go up in flames tomorrow I dare say you would never hear her say she was upset about it.
Now, should Bubba or Fed have consulted or at least told her about the hire? Perhaps, but had UNC not been under a microscope for the last 5-6 years I dare say this would have never even made the press. Yes, I can see where this would not have been a smart move, but I wasn't upset with it since he didn't have player interaction, wasn't paid and since he settled with Illinois, telling me perhaps at least some of it wasn't 100% accurate.
Heck, we ALL know how the press screws things up to fit their agenda, so why do we assume everything said about Beckman was the gospel?
Regardless, it is over now and SHOULD blow over. Of course we know Kane and his minions are probably out there now trying their best to uncover some new "scandal" to nail us on.