Film Review: Lessons Learned Against UCLA
- By David Sisk
- Four Corners
- 15 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Libs don't care, ABTHaving the most important person/job in the world handled by someone who is two or three quarts short and literally everyone around them not only knows it, but covers it up and lies to everyone else claiming that he is running at top efficiency doesn't qualify as one of the biggest scandals? I mean, who actually is our president? Who has and is running things for the next month?
Have you heard from our inept prez?“Biggest scandal in America”? Lol
Not the popular opinion but I agree. I laugh when I hear or read pg1. Not popular either I know.It's my personal preference that you don't have a PG that needs to initiate everything. I know that's sort of the tradition at UNC to have a PG that controls everything. All I know is the best teams in the country can trigger their offense through a big. UCLA was able to trigger their offense through their big and they probably win that game if that big didn't get into foul trouble. Once they couldn't run their offense through a big and they became guard dribble happy, their offense stalled and let the game get away.
That solution is clearly not on this roster. It would be coaching malpractice to trigger your offense through Withers, lol. And I don't know if Washington or Lubin are skilled enough to do that. But you look at all of the teams that usually make a run in the tournament... Last year, NC State had that really wide bodied kid. Duke ran their offense through Filipowski. Alabama ran through their bigs especially against UNC. UConn had Karaban and Clingin to trigger through. Hell, UNC's last final four consisted of a lot of offense being run through Brady Manek. That isn't a coincidence.
This team obviously doesn't have that. So they're limited and this season will probably end relatively early. Going forward... It isn't about which PG UNC has IMO. If they want to get back to being a really good program that needs to be considered for significant things every season, they need to have a big that they can run their offense through. I prefer a big who can score a little, who can pass a little, and who can take more than 1 dribble if needed. I prefer someone like Manek myself. But UNC has traditionally gone for more of the back to the basket big. Fine, you can trigger your offense through that!
But along with Cadeau's lack of confidence in his jumper and the other clear issues the bigs have... This team's gaping offensive hole right now is they don't have a big skilled enough to run any offense through. Skilled in scoring, passing, or handling.
It's my personal preference that you don't have a PG that needs to initiate everything. I know that's sort of the tradition at UNC to have a PG that controls everything. All I know is the best teams in the country can trigger their offense through a big. UCLA was able to trigger their offense through their big and they probably win that game if that big didn't get into foul trouble. Once they couldn't run their offense through a big and they became guard dribble happy, their offense stalled and let the game get away.I do agree with the lack of movement and it making it difficult but several tos are just too much. Someone used the analogy of KISS which is really simple but very much in play even with higher athletics. And yes being to pg usually means you get back first or cover runouts but some guards rebound better than others no matter where they play. As far as the lack of bigs I agree. We’ve had way too many assists missed because of it too. lol I thought for sure that Gary would have eluded to it for this past game. At one time RJ could have had around four or five in a row, but had no finish from the post or fumble. EC too
I agree but to add a culmination of players, fit, culture of basketball in general ie nil and privilege. alwould about to pass out when he reads this lol. I’d also say RJ Davis sucking it up from deep and pressing too hard, EC uncontrolled and reckless at times, Seth shrinking and not being seen on offense until prodded, and bigs being well…., are all factors too. Someone please tag him in this to show I bad mouthed RJ lol. I don’t know how to tag.I’ll just say that I think Hubert is leaving a lot on the table right now. He’s nowhere close to doing the best job he can do with this program.
best short summary of the issues facing this teamI’ll just say that I think Hubert is leaving a lot on the table right now. He’s nowhere close to doing the best job he can do with this program.
Jay Wright had big guards so I doubt he would've ever recruited Cadeau and RJ to begin with(?). Doesn't seem to really fit his strategy of posting up guards. It's a great strategy because guards aren't used to defend in the post so if you can develop that, then that's a huge advantage. I've been asking for UNC guards to develop playing off 2-feet in the paint for a while, but that's not really a UNC thing. The last guard I recall doing it well was McCants and that guy was built like a tank for a college kid.the roster makeup sucks bottom line. but put this group under a better staff and there’s adjustments and better sets being run, etc. jay wright literally made a living with rosters that were dominated by 4 guard lineups. Hubert is incapable.