DAILY DROP (Updated: RJ's legacy?)
- By andrew jones
- Four Corners
- 1059 Replies
This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.
Check the prices when Trump was in office.
wait, you support Kamala Harris and you talk about MY gullibility? LOL.
Nice non-answer, BTW. There just isn't much to you, is there?
We're all gullible to some extent. But if I become as gullible as you or so gullible as to take anything you offer seriously, I will be too embarrassed to ever post here again. Doesn't stop you though. You might be too dumb to be embarrassed.
Racist, reported.Mark Robinson.
Wow, what a pearl of wisdom.This is so funny.
and by the same token and by comparison, an indication of dem and Kamala Harris' duplicity in holding Biden's performance up as being fully competent. Thank you.Well said.
Login to view embedded media
[And, btw, more evidence that being old doesn't necessarily conflict with presidential-caliber views and delivery.]
wait, you support Kamala Harris and you talk about MY gullibility? LOL.I see you're embarrassed for being so gullible. It's OK, I'm certain you are used to it by now.
LOL at Stephen Rattner. You are all over X aren't you? Free speech is nice isn't it?
Check the prices when Trump was in office.Knowing that Pres doesn't have much impact historically on energy prices or any other prices, why do you think Trump would be better here? Tariff-talk?
Elon MuskWhat makes you thinkRepubsmaga are better regarding the deficit and budget compared to Dems?
I know which side let the most in.Bosides have wanted the illegals out forever. One side just uses more harsh rhetoric and language. Just like the wall wasn't build, natty deportation ain't gonna happen. It would be insanely expensive to implement and the economic implications on the labor force would be costly. And it will require a million legal hoops.
Remember, there is legal migration (people knocking on the door at the border seeking amnesty or work), then there is ILLEGAL migration. Trump had NO impact on ILLEGAL migration... cuz it's just too easy to get into this country, walls or no walls - this won't change under Trump nor any other administration.
Both admins will likely take a similar approach, which is to impact the processing and faster rejection/ejection of people not meeting amnesty qualifications. And to encourage people to apply prior to getting to the border.
Last I checked Trump forced other countries to pay more into NATO.What makes you think money overseas will be different under Trump this time? What policy and ideas has he put forth which make the change you are seeking? (PS, he can make threats regarding NATO, but the US [even under Proj 25] need alliances to fight the fights against China, N Korea, Iran, etc).
Apparently Harris has some folks on her staff who are pretty libertarian when it comes to things like nation-building (according to books they've written, etc)... for all we know she might spend less in that specific arena than Trump's gang would.
And who will Trump's sec of state be? Guys like Rubio and Robert O'brien are names that have been floated, both are pro NATO.
This is what you people don't follow. I'm not following the guy, I'm following the policies and ideas. He'll never win a congeniality competition and I'm good with that. I want to stop sending so much money overseas, I want the illegals out, I want the government to manage money the way I have to, I want energy prices down, I want all prices down, I don't want men in girls sports or bathrooms, I don't want to pay for anyone to transition, I'm tired of the handouts. Your party doesn't offer that. You vote on your "feelings" and I'll vote with my wallet.
"Simple question, why would be teleprompter for her be in Spanish? 🤔"
wha? Some simple questions for you. Did you even make it out of the eighth grade? How about getting your GED before you try to post in a public forum. You're embarrassing us with your routine slaughter of the language.
And why would you suggest in question form that the text was in Spanish? Oh never mind, that one is obvious.
And the teleprompter turned off when they realized the camera was on it.
"Have you figured out why trump claimed the Iowa caucus was rigged?"
I'm waiting for you to stop using that as a deflection from the challenge I gave you of substantiating why a post of mine was 'dribble', as your simple, uneducated ass stupidly called it. I said you couldn't because you're just a gasbag; and your repeated failures to even TRY to provide any substantiation shows that to be true.
How hard could that be, to at least attempt to substantiate a claim, unless you are just a gasbag mouthing idiocy.
I look forward to your next brainless reply which will surely contain the word 'cult' and yet another dodge of my challenge.
Knowing that Pres doesn't have much impact historically on energy prices or any other prices, why do you think Trump would be better here? Tariff-talk?I want energy prices down, I want all prices down,
What makes you thinkI want the government to manage money the way I have to
True. There may be more than meets the eye.lol good thoughts but don't forget the times we are living in. I want to see the rest of it before committing to a display of unbridled lust.
Bosides have wanted the illegals out forever. One side just uses more harsh rhetoric and language. Just like the wall wasn't build, natty deportation ain't gonna happen. It would be insanely expensive to implement and the economic implications on the labor force would be costly. And it will require a million legal hoops.I want the illegals out