If you taught them who his opponent was, they most certainly would have voted for Mr 304.
A Day Without Women
- Thread starter Blue2010
- Start date
In other news, we should have a Worst Post of the Month thread. Congrats on being the the first nominee.
That defies logic. Any that would vote for Trump slipped through the cracks simply because they are unteachable.
Honestly can't tell if you think he was actually was talking about South Boston, Mass. or if you're being funny.
Look out @Blue2010 , I think HN is following you into a restroom!
No worries...good lookin' out, man.
As a mindless nincompoop, I found this article riveting. It really helped me learn the ropes...highly recommended.
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-03-10/7-harsh-realities-life-millennials-need-understand?page=4
Why do you even share that lowbrow crap? Even as a nincompoop, isn't that well below your standards, Blue?
Someone didn't read the article in their safe place.
Appreciate you confirming my belief. This concludes your social experiment.
Carry on, good sir.
Thanks, Blue, and let me know when you would like to come down to the research center and I'll be happy to pencil you in. The Pan troglodytes are extremely anxious to glean some wisdom from your aberrant behavioral patterns.
Normally, no, but I like where you're going with this. See, we're making progress already.
Dealbreaker. Worst fruit on the planet and not as healthy as folks think.
I assume you're a millennial like I am? Why do you insist on being overly obnoxious?
So it's International women's day but, didn't a man win woman of the year last year?
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...year-awards-never-thought-id-be-here-20151011
http://www.usmagazine.com/celebrity...year-awards-never-thought-id-be-here-20151011
Am I missing something? Why are you posting them here instead of your India thread?
Maybe the rationale is something deep. Like, without women - we wouldn't know where to properly poast pictures. Lyles is just supporting the movement.
I thought maybe it was that without women, that frieze from the Hindu temple, well ... it would have a whole other vibe.
Oh, shit, not another underaged, presumptuous a-hole who doesn't understand satire. Where will the stupidity end?
Apparently Soros paid out $246 million for this movement yesterday.
I think it's about time for "A Day Without A Man" movement... "I'm hongray"
Any takers?
I think it's about time for "A Day Without A Man" movement... "I'm hongray"
Any takers?
What the hell is wrong with that guy? The world will be a better place when he bites the dust (86 years old right now).
From Fox News:
Billionaire George Soros gave $246 million to groups behind Wednesday's "Day Without a Woman" protest, according to a report by a conservative think tank.
Using "gave" instead of "has given" was intentionally misleading, because it made it sound like Soros directly funded the marches. Fox News also neglected to mention that the $246 million was the cumulative total of his donations to groups involved in the march over a 15-year span. The original quote from conservative think tank Media Research Center's NewsBusters story:
100 of the 544 Women’s March partners received a total of $246,637,217 from Soros between 2000 and 2014.
Fair and balanced, lol. And yes, I realize WaPo, NYT, CNN, etc. do the same thing so spare me the whataboutisms.
FWIW, even if this is a range of dates, that still far exceeds my salary over that same time span. My point remains...and I'm still "hongray"
I just linked the source of the disinformation Fox News spoon fed you. It is a range of dates.
So then are you angry that the Koch Brothers planned to spend $889 million in the run-up to the 2016 election? I just want to make sure I'm getting mad about the right things here.
Let me be clear on where I stand here -- I think it is blatantly ridiculous for ANYONE to pay that kind of money to ANY party for ANY candidate. I'm of the belief that we should vote for the candidate based on principles and what our own beliefs are rather than who has the most funding or who is able to pay for the most advertising. Does that help?
On the GOP side, it made me sick listening to Ted Cruz last year on TV going "we raised $xxx.xx" and we have had xxx number of people visit out website...blah blah bla-f***ing-blah. Who gives a rats ass?
