I mean, it definitely was not a chop but a punch. I didn't knows the refs discussed it, but I also can't say they handled it fairly by allowing a player to punch another, which is probably an automatic ejection.
It was barely a few minutes into the game, so I am not sure how drastic this could have been going on prior or why referees were "warning" instead of calling fouls if this was the issue. Hell, some of our gurus here say UVA holds on every play.
Also, according to ESPN's play by play, Northeastern had 0 fouls called on it prior to this incident.
Figuring that is probably an ejection if seen, I don't think that is the type of fire we want from our players.maybe Garrison should have that same fire against some of the better competition we face....
Figuring that is probably an ejection if seen, I don't think that is the type of fire we want from our players.
I’m totally not one to argue but that’s not a punch. Even though his hand may be clinched, that’s a chop and “get the crap off me.” LOLWow! Clear punch , not a good look from the upperclassman in my opinion
But by no means do I think it was good. I actually think brooks was the instigator. Looked that way, but I know all the junk that’s said and done on the court too.I’m totally not one to argue but that’s not a punch. Even though his hand may be clinched, that’s a chop and “get the crap off me.” LOL
hey @Travis2262 I'm curious whe you found this ACC Network link to view the game after it was over. Do you have to be an ACC Network subscriber?
I've been watching the 05, 09, and 17 UNC championship games on YouTube lately (it helps after watching a horrible game like vs Virginia). The game last night just happened to show up as a recommendation on YouTube today.hey @Travis2262 I'm curious whe you found this ACC Network link to view the game after it was over. Do you have to be an ACC Network subscriber?
I'm curious because I live in the midwest and I have not found a decent way to stream the ACC Network games. I suppose I could pay for them but I just haven't yet. Is there a place on ACC Network where people can view games after they have completed, for free? TIA.
Well, you are referencing him punching someone. Garrison Brooks is also holding the other guy's arm when he punches him. There was no fouls prior, which your story said there was... and you said the refs were warning them about holding... but I don't think the game shows that either.That's what I saw and was referencing.
found it on espn3.com last night, had not been able to stream ACCN games previouslyhey @Travis2262 I'm curious whe you found this ACC Network link to view the game after it was over. Do you have to be an ACC Network subscriber?
I'm curious because I live in the midwest and I have not found a decent way to stream the ACC Network games. I suppose I could pay for them but I just haven't yet. Is there a place on ACC Network where people can view games after they have completed, for free? TIA.
I won't go so far as to say bust. But I am definitely disappointed for Garrison.... none of us know the why, but our eyes don't lie, he's missing easy shots, getting flustered at defenders and watching one, and now two freshmen play with greater effect.Brooks has been a bust this year, both from a production and leadership perspective.
Well, you are referencing him punching someone. Garrison Brooks is also holding the other guy's arm when he punches him. There was no fouls prior, which your story said there was... and you said the refs were warning them about holding... but I don't think the game shows that either.
There was no TOs prior. Instead of throwing crap at the board trying to find a defense to defend these actions to stick, maybe actually review the video above. I know he is a Tar Heel, but this is turning into Duke defending Grayson Allen tripping levels of nonsense.That particular sequence was not a thrown punch that I could see. AND, as I said, the information I received, was not my observation at all, but was relayed to me by someone who was there. I was just simply conveying what I was told. You got a problem with this?
ETA: If a warning did take place, which I believe did, and was during a TO, it is more than likely that if the network broke for commercial activity, then the discussion by the officials with the benches would not have been seen by an audience perhaps?
There was no TOs prior. Instead of throwing crap at the board trying to find a defense to defend these actions to stick, maybe actually review the video above. I know he is a Tar Heel, but this is turning into Duke defending Grayson Allen tripping levels of nonsense.
Your source has been proven wrong countless times, and you have a primary source to view it yourself. Yes, when you keep using a nonsensical defense to something, someone is going to point out it is nonsensical. That isn't beligerrence. That is just common sense.If you perceive as "crap" what I post on this board, then don't read it. I am not defending anything. What I posted was what I had discussed with an individual who WAS THERE, and if his account is not correct, then he saw it wrong.
What I don't get, is the argumentative belligerence on your part, to what has turned out to be an inconsequential play that is over and done with.
Your source has been proven wrong countless times, and you have a primary source to view it yourself. Yes, when you keep using a nonsensical defense to something, someone is going to point out it is nonsensical. That isn't beligerrence. That is just common sense.
Nothing you are saying makes any sense, and you have video to see for yourself why it doesn't. Again. This is becoming Grayson Allen levels of defense for his tripping.
I mean, I can remember Duke fans saying "it was an accident" "they didn't even call a foul on it" "it was inconsequential" "he is a good person and wouldn't do that". Yadda yadda. It's right there. You can see right there what happened. If you wish to discuss it, maybe viewing it when presented should be a prerequisite?
Your source has been proven wrong countless times, and you have a primary source to view it yourself. Yes, when you keep using a nonsensical defense to something, someone is going to point out it is nonsensical. That isn't beligerrence. That is just common sense.
Nothing you are saying makes any sense, and you have video to see for yourself why it doesn't. Again. This is becoming Grayson Allen levels of defense for his tripping.
I mean, I can remember Duke fans saying "it was an accident" "they didn't even call a foul on it" "it was inconsequential" "he is a good person and wouldn't do that". Yadda yadda. It's right there. You can see right there what happened. If you wish to discuss it, maybe viewing it when presented should be a prerequisite?