ADVERTISEMENT

For those who care...

I already know who is coming to visit don't need premi for that pj Washington is the official visitor. David McCormick a 4* 2017 big is visits so is Coby White as well as Wendell Moore and Christian brown.

That about cover it?

All that takes is a little bit of grunt work
 
Last edited:
Actually, I was more wanting confirmation that Vanderbilt was coming for late night. I totally agree, any Tar Heel fan shoud IMO that Roy features his being men every opportunity he can. Of course he learned that from the master in Dean, feed the bigs for easy buckets and maybe even the and 1.

No matter, ya still not lieing, I was just not clear on what you was not lieing about! LOL


It wasn't meant for you it was for roseheel. My bad
 
Saying Shaq wasn't an over the rim guy is like saying Ray Allen wasn't a 3 point shooter.
The sky appears to be blue.

There's something I say that maybe you won't nitpickingly disagree with today.
 
I already know who is coming to visit don't need premi for that pj Washington is the official visitor. David McCormick a 4* 2017 big is visits so is copy white as well as Wendell Moore and Christian brown.

That about cover it?

All that takes is a little bit of grunt work
Nope.
 
I already know who is coming to visit don't need premi for that pj Washington is the official visitor. David McCormick a 4* 2017 big is visits so is Coby White as well as Wendell Moore and Christian brown.

That about cover it? NO

All that takes is a little bit of grunt work
 


Kool no sweat off my back still not buying your premi stuff. It gets annoying when people say you need to because of this nugget of info. Or that nugget of info. I don't know who else may or may not be visiting but I know those guys are and that's better than most.
 
Kool no sweat off my back still not buying your premi stuff. It gets annoying when people say you need to because of this nugget of info. Or that nugget of info. I don't know who else may or may not be visiting but I know those guys are and that's better than most.

That is far from the ONLY reason to get premi, but carry on.
 
Kool no sweat off my back still not buying your premi stuff. It gets annoying when people say you need to because of this nugget of info. Or that nugget of info. I don't know who else may or may not be visiting but I know those guys are and that's better than most.

You're so wrong. So very very wrong.
 
From what I see, McCormick is a '18 recruit. NTL, he is a man among men in high school. He's strong as a bull, and is very skilled with his off hand, making him very difficult to defend down low. He'll need to lose a bit of weight but he'd be an immediate force inside. And he has no pretense about being a forward or playing outside. Would love to land this guy!

http://player.mashpedia.com/player.php?q=eHQ8GjgMpZ8
 
From what I see, McCormick is a '18 recruit. NTL, he is a man among men in high school. He's strong as a bull, and is very skilled with his off hand, making him very difficult to defend down low. He'll need to lose a bit of weight but he'd be an immediate force inside. And he has no pretense about being a forward or playing outside. Would love to land this guy!

http://player.mashpedia.com/player.php?q=eHQ8GjgMpZ8

Kid looks like he has vice grips for hands, very strong for sure. He needs to get himself in to top condition and clearly he isn't well conditioned now. Has instincts and soft touch but it is going to be hard to see what he can become until he gets himself in shape to play at a big time level. Kinda reminds me a little bit of BJ Anja for the wuffies but not close to the reach the wuffie has. Bit of a project but worth the scholly *IMO.
 
One point that he brought up to me is that every year he’s coached at UNC, a big man was the leading or second-leading scorer,” Stokes explained. “That one caught my attention. He said that is how it’s been from Tyler Hansbrough to Brice Johnson and many other players. He said that showed that his style of play is going inside first.”


That is straight from the kids mouth. Roy told him a big man has led in scoring I wasn't misquoting at all.

I'm not trying to dwell on this, but that pretty much was a misquote. Your original post said:

" a big man led the team in scoring every yr he has been there"

The "second-leading scorer" was a pretty important piece of what I was pointing out. Just saying.

Vanderbilt's OV is scheduled for 10/14.

Thanks.

not what I meant.

Then I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about.
 
I'm not trying to dwell on this, but that pretty much was a misquote. Your original post said:

" a big man led the team in scoring every yr he has been there"

The "second-leading scorer" was a pretty important piece of what I was pointing out. Just saying.



Thanks.



Then I'm afraid I have no idea what you're talking about.


No you are not just saying; you in a round about way called me a liar. It may have been a misquote which wasn't a quote since I didn't use " in my original post; see how that works. So it should be assumed that I am paraphrasing instead of quoting an article, so what I did was cut and paste a sentence from said article. Feels like you couldn't call me a liar, because you read, and saw damn he did have some info. So now you resort to attacking my misquoting which wasn't a quote. Just saying bruh.
 
No you are not just saying; you in a round about way called me a liar. It may have been a misquote which wasn't a quote since I didn't use " in my original post; see how that works. So it should be assumed that I am paraphrasing instead of quoting an article, so what I did was cut and paste a sentence from said article. Feels like you couldn't call me a liar, because you read, and saw damn he did have some info. So now you resort to attacking my misquoting which wasn't a quote. Just saying bruh.

Let me spell this out for you since you don't seem to get what I'm saying.

The thing you originally stated was not correct, so there were 3 potential parties that said something wrong:

- Roy
- The Premium Article
- You

I would hope that our own coach and the Premium Article that people pay for wouldn't have said something wrong concerning the team and their stats, so i assumed it was the poster that shared the info that had left something out. Whether is was "on purpose" or "by accident" remains to be seen.

You're dwelling on me calling it a "misquote", but in actuality, the problem I have is that what you posted originally has a far different meaning than what the quote said. You're right, that doesn't classify as a misquote, that classifies as "inaccurate". It's not "paraphrasing" if the meaning is changed by the words you post.

I didn't call or imply that anyone was a liar. Sounds more like you're a little hurt that someone called you out for being wrong. All I wanted to know was if it was misquoted because what you shared was, in fact, wrong. If i thought you were lying, I would gladly call you out on it. As I would anyone else on this board. If you don't want to feel like a liar, next time don't post things that aren't right in the first place.

"bruh".

EDIT: Clarified some things so I won't be called a "liar" down the road. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Let me spell this out for you since you don't seem to get what I'm saying.

The thing you originally stated was not correct, so there were 3 potential parties that said something wrong:

- Roy
- The Premium Article
- You

I would hope that our own coach and the Premium Article that people pay for wouldn't have said something wrong concerning the team and their stats, so i assumed it was the poster that shared the info that had left something out.

You're dwelling on me calling it a "misquote", but in actuality, the problem I have is that what you posted originally has a far different meaning than what the quote said. You're right, that doesn't classify as a misquote, that classifies as "inaccurate". It's not "paraphrasing" if the meaning is changed by the words you post.

I didn't call or imply that anyone was a liar. Sounds more like you're a little hurt that someone called you out for being wrong. All I wanted to know was if it was misquoted because what you shared was, in fact, wrong. If i thought you were lying, I would gladly call you out on it. As I would anyone else on this board. If you don't want to feel like a liar, next time don't post things that aren't right in the first place.

"bruh".
The fact that rather than acknowledge the correction you CHOSE to again harp on it while saying not trying to dwell on this but (paraphrasing you there) is the main reason I said something but I digress...

We can go back and forth all day let's agree on that; however it wasn't very inaccurate "bruh"since a big man was the leading or second leading scorer every yr since he has been here. and Hairston played the 3-4 which makes him more of a big than say a 2. My feelings don't get hurt all that easily, and they werent hurt here. Agan it is never lost on me that this is a message board. If you indeed weren't trying to call me a liar my apologies. It was just how I read it, and apparently I wasn't the only one who felt as if you were calling me so.So my bad, and from now on I will do you a solid and just cut and paste little snippets instead of going off my 34 yr old memory which isn't always the best to begin with; kool?
 
Last edited:
The fact that rather than acknowledge the correction you CHOSE to again harp on it while saying not trying to dwell on this but (paraphrasing you there) is the main reason I said something but I digress...

We can go back and forth all day let's agree on that; however it wasn't very inaccurate "bruh"since a big man was the leading or second leading scorer every yr since he has been here. and Hairston played the 3-4 which makes him more of a big than say a 2. My feelings don't get hurt all that easily, and they werent hurt here. Agan it is never lost on me that this is a message board. If you indeed weren't trying to call me a liar my apologies. It was just how I read it, and apparently I wasn't the only one who felt as if you were calling me so.So my bad, and from now on I will do you a solid and just cut and paste little snippets instead of going off my 34 yr old memory which isn't always the best to begin with; kool?

I am not attempting to dwell, but you seemed to want to turn this non-issue into an issue.

As said, I did not call or imply anyone was a liar, and I don't think you were purposefully trying to mislead anyone. I also didn't see anyone else that thought I was. All I was trying to point out is that saying a big was "the leading scorer" does not automatically relay to "one of the leading scorers".

I did not attempt to single you out, nor was I trying to be a stickler or a grammar-nazi. I just wanted to point out why I was originally confused. In fact, the only reason I wanted to know what was said was because it would've worried me more if Roy or A Premium article had said that.

Also, I'm not asking you to alter your posts either for my sake. Just wanted to understand what was being left out. No biggie.
 
mike is right. Since the original topic was Garrison Brooks and recruiting, I'll switch back to that:

EJ Montgomery commits to Auburn
http://www.todaysu.com/u-news/class-2018-5-star-power-forward-e-j-montgomery-commits-auburn/

IMO Definitely helps us with Garrison Brooks! Can't imagine he'll want to compete with all of those guys for PT over the next 2+ years.

Does anyone have the full list of guys visiting this weekend?
White, Moore, McCormack, Brown. Along with PJ of course. Pretty sure it's those 5.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT