Because that's the whole point. Can you believe in the absence of proof?
Seems like an odd game for god to play, but ok. But what makes you believe in the Christian version of god as compared to god being some sort of alien or something?
Because that's the whole point. Can you believe in the absence of proof?
Seems like an odd game for god to play, but ok. But what makes you believe in the Christian version of god as compared to god being some sort of alien or something?
Just wanted to share A Scripture that Came to Heart.
Hebrews 11:6
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him
It's All About Faith folks. You can't see the Wind can you? But you know it's their because you feel it. You can't see God, but if you place your Faith in Him and Accept Him, I promise you can feel Him at times when The Holy Spirit is Moving!
So you have a vagina? I always knew you were a pussy.No sand in my vagina.
So you have a vagina? I always knew you were a pussy.
Problem is down through the centuries Christians and other religions have had a bad habit of killing people who didn't believe their way.But for years and years, people have bought into the Christian faith because it gives them a sense of peace. Why try to shit on that? If you don't believe, just f*ck off and leave those that do believe alone.
Not believing in a god at all is simply a lack of belief in god. It all comes down to the burden of proof. There's no logical way to prove something doesn't exist. So should we be agnostic about every fictitious human invention? Should we be agnostic about Russel's Teapot?
Problem is down through the centuries Christians and other religions have had a bad habit of killing people who didn't believe their way.
Well, that doesn't happen now so we don't really need to discuss that.
I realize you can't prove that god doesn't exist, but it's something that you do believe to be true. It's not something that you personally seem unsure about.
I think Russell's Teapot isn't a very good analogy. It's a physical thing and wouldn't have any reason to exist there, and it's existence wouldn't have any effect on anything else we can see.
Whatever created the particles that ended up combining to form the matter that ended up being the big bang needed to come from somewhere, and science doesn't have a very good answer for that happening naturally. Therefore, believing something supernatural was needed to place something in the physical world to start everything seems like as good an explanation as any.
Wait, what?
Problem is down through the centuries Christians and other religions have had a bad habit of killing people who didn't believe their way.
Christianity isn't killing people. If that happens, then it's crazy people killing people.
Man that's a weak cop-out.
Yes and I fully embrace it. If you don't like it then put me on ignore you pussy.Remember that talk some of us have had with you about "low hanging fruit"?
If you're going to assume that something supernatural had to invent those particles for them to exist, then why wouldn't you assume that something supernatural had to create that god? Its an infinitely regressive rabbit hole.
Yes and I fully embrace it. If you don't like it then put me on ignore you pussy.
Now I'm all confused by the stump storyYes and I fully embrace it. If you don't like it then put me on ignore you pussy.
The difference here is that I know that physical things need to be created from other physical things. The physical world is something I'm pretty aware of. I don't know that something supernatural needs to be created by something else because I don't understand how the supernatural works, it's not physical.
Doesn't happen now? Are you crazy?Well, that doesn't happen now so we don't really need to discuss that. I'm sorry if some of your nonbelieving ancestors were victims.
Matter isn't created nor is it destroyed. Its simply restructured or rearranged. All of the matter in the universe existed before the Big Bang. It was just in singularity. A better model would be thinking of the universe like a lung. Quantum fluctuations cause the singularity to explode (Big Bang) and the universe expands until the matter and energy is so dispersed that the universe can no longer hold itself up, and quantum fluctuations cause space to collapse in on itself until the singularity is reached again. And it cycles on endlessly. No beginning, and no end.
Sure, I can agree with all that. I guess our difference is that you believe that matter has always just been there in perpetuity, whereas I feel like there must have been something, not made of matter, to create that matter in the first place.
Doesn't happen now? Are you crazy?
You couldn't be more wrong........No. I’ve explained already that it’s crazy people killing others. Not Christianity.
So you're just inventing a loophole for your own rule.
Matter isn't created nor is it destroyed. Its simply restructured or rearranged. All of the matter in the universe existed before the Big Bang. It was just in singularity. A better model would be thinking of the universe like a lung. Quantum fluctuations cause the singularity to explode (Big Bang) and the universe expands until the matter and energy is so dispersed that the universe can no longer hold itself up, and quantum fluctuations cause space to collapse in on itself until the singularity is reached again. And it cycles on endlessly. No beginning, and no end.
You couldn't be more wrong........
I don’t think you’ve ever made a poast or comment that meant anything to me. I’ve never found anything you’ve poasted to be interesting, funny or worth the time I spent reading it. I’ve essentially tuned you out. I literally scroll by your poasts every time unless I get a notification that you quoted me. And then I just disregard your thoughts as “that’s just that old fella and while he means no harm, he’s probably just losing his mind.” So it goes without saying that the above quoted poast of yours was looked upon with that sentiment. You can continue to respond to my comments, but it was only fair that I tell you that.
I can't think of a single instance where Christianity killed someone. I can think of many instances where crazy people kill people. Your point is like saying my spoon made me fat.You couldn't be more wrong........
Gosh, if there was just something you could do to solve your problem. I bet if you put on your thinking cap you could come up with it....I don’t think you’ve ever made a poast or comment that meant anything to me. I’ve never found anything you’ve poasted to be interesting, funny or worth the time I spent reading it. I’ve essentially tuned you out. I literally scroll by your poasts every time unless I get a notification that you quoted me. And then I just disregard your thoughts as “that’s just that old fella and while he means no harm, he’s probably just losing his mind.” So it goes without saying that the above quoted poast of yours was looked upon with that sentiment. You can continue to respond to my comments, but it was only fair that I tell you that.
I'd say it's a little of both. You can find far more people who lead lives of peace and empathy in the religions. But, if people WANT to interpret and be inspired to commit violence, then The Bible, The Quran, The Little Engine That Could, will provide written motivation and even justification.You couldn't be more wrong........
I'm really entertained when the Abrahamic religions fight among themselves. THAT is tragically funny. Protestants murdering Catholics. Muslims hating Jews. It's hilarious. They all have the exact same characters in their mythology and they can't even get on the same page.
Hell, I love it even more when Baptists argue with each other! Catholics and Protestants murdering one another and they have THE SAME SAVIOR! It's poetic!
I'd say it's a little of both. You can find far more people who lead lives of peace and empathy in the religions. But, if people WANT to interpret and be inspired to commit violence, then The Bible, The Quran, The Little Engine That Could, will provide written motivation and even justification.
I'm really entertained when the Abrahamic religions fight among themselves. THAT is tragically funny. Protestants murdering Catholics. Muslims hating Jews. It's hilarious. They all have the exact same characters in their mythology and they can't even get on the same page.
Hell, I love it even more when Baptists argue with each other! Catholics and Protestants murdering one another and they have THE SAME SAVIOR! It's poetic!
I know what you mean. I personally find it hilarious when two minority groups that liberals have brainwashed battle to see who can sound more victimized. Kind of the same thing.
Remember that talk some of us have had with you about "low hanging fruit"?
Oh, I know they have the texts. But, I also know that a vast majority of Muslims, Jews, Catholics and Protestants manage to worship every Friday, Saturday and Sunday and there are relatively few acts of violence on a weekly basis.Come on... Two out of three of those books explicitly condone violence with the justification of divine authority. It doesn’t take some ridiculous leap to get to a violent interpretation of the Bible or the Quran. Acting like it’s just crazy people could find a justification in any book completely fails to address the issue of problematic religious doctrines that lead people to violence. Neither the Quran nor the Bible have any shortage of those doctrines.
Oh, I know they have the texts. But, I also know that a vast majority of Muslims, Jews, Catholics and Protestants manage to worship every Friday, Saturday and Sunday and there are relatively few acts of violence on a weekly basis.