Yeah, right now I would see Naz as our starting 4 with Cam at the 3, Luke at the 5, Jelek the point, and Kenny at the 2.
"Polished" is a good word. The only thing lacking in his offensive game right now is consistent footwork --- the type of stuff he will learn pronto at Carolina.
Naz was my #1 priority for this class for a while, and he just keeps getting better as he polishes his skills. The rest of the right stuff --- instinct, awareness, presence and motor --- has always been there and quickly recognizable to the educated eye as elite. That's why his stock continues to rise as his polish catches up with his enormous born talent.
Thank you, Jeff Lebo for helping steer him to the Hill.
To echo some of the same sentiments ---
Everyone knows Nas's physical tools are elite. He has solid height (6'6" in shoes), great length (7'1" wingspan, 8'9" reach), a great build (215 right now, can easily carry 10-15 more pounds), and great explosiveness. He's not super quick or fluid, but he's not super stiff, either. His physical profile is similar to Kawhi's (minus a bit of height and length, plus a bit of bounce).
But beyond that, he's flashed basically every type of scoring skill. He can get to the rim, he can hit from 3, he can pull-up, and he can score in the post (including drop steps and turn-around jumpers).
Some guys with elite physical tools never develop those skills. Jaylen Brown, who has a lot of overlap with Nas, is a valuable player for the Celtics but has no ability to create offense - he plays defense, hits 3s, and cuts (again, that's a very valuable type of player; just not a star).
Nas already has the full offensive toolkit. It's just a matter of polishing those skills and integrating them into a cohesive offensive game.
...only to a point, and it actually undervalues Naz.Man...Jaylen Brown is a great comparison.
I'm not sure that offer was "committable" --- I've heard both ends of that --- but yes, happy indeed. He was never what I call a "UNC player"... more of a "NC State player", or as it turned out a "BC player". Good enough certainly for the ACC but not an impact guy in our system.Gotta say - I sure am happy Hamilton didn't jump on his UNC offer.
I'm not sure that offer was "committable" --- I've heard both ends of that --- but yes, happy indeed. He was never what I call a "UNC player"... more of a "NC State player", or as it turned out a "BC player". Good enough certainly for the ACC but not an impact guy in our system.
True enough, it's not as cut and dried as football. It's more fluid and handled more privately between the staff and the prospects, but the dynamics do differ with different recruits. I guess a better way to put it is that his commitment window wasn't open quite as wide, or for as long as some others...Pretty sure it was committable at one point. We don't really offer non-committable "offers" like you see in football. By the time we were really in it for Nas I'm pretty sure we wouldn't've taken him, though.
This makes much more sense than sitting Cam on the bench. Thanks.3. Doesn't push anyone to the bench. If Cam is back we likely stay Bomb Squad, if not then Luke slides back to the 4 and we start Hybrid with a Soph Big.
I'm not sure that offer was "committable" --- I've heard both ends of that --- but yes, happy indeed. He was never what I call a "UNC player"... more of a "NC State player", or as it turned out a "BC player". Good enough certainly for the ACC but not an impact guy in our system.
Really bad comparisons.Well if guys like Huffman, Platek, and B Rob are on the UNC team than I see no reason why Hamilton couldn't as well.
If Cam leaves, I don't think it will be for fear of losing a starting position to a freshman. I don't see that happening.If Cam thinks so, does that pressure him to leave?
Could he transfer again? Has any player ever transferred twice after graduating?
For that matter has any player played 2 more years after graduating? I imagine that's quite rare, if it has ever happened.
Really bad comparisons.
Easy. Huff is a project neither needed nor expected to contribute immediately. BRob and Andrew are both 4 yr players who have and will contribute mightily here. Hamilton was being recruited at a position of immediate need (Hybrid) to likely start as a freshman. He is not of that ilk to do what we need of him. Had we taken him and not gotten Naz that would have been a major net loss. There is way more to our recruiting than rankings.How? Those three are borderline UNC players in the Williams era. Hamilton is actually a higher rated commit than all three I believe
I'm comparing them to B Rob and Platek. Hamilton was never starting as a freshman lol he's not good enough to do so. My point is Hamilton definitely has a spot on UNC - contrary to what the poster saidEasy. Huff is a project neither needed nor expected to contribute immediately. BRob and Andrew are both 4 yr players who have and will contribute mightily here. Hamilton was being recruited at a position of immediate need (Hybrid) to likely start as a freshman. He is not of that ilk to do what we need of him. Had we taken him and not gotten Naz that would have been a major net loss. There is way more to our recruiting than rankings.
No. He doesn't.I'm comparing them to B Rob and Platek. Hamilton was never starting as a freshman lol he's not good enough to do so. My point is Hamilton definitely has a spot on UNC - contrary to what the poster said
Yes. He would.So Huffman and Platek would see minutes on a team with Harrison Barnes, Tyler Zeller, John Henson, Kendall Marshall, Reggie Bullock, JMM, and PJ Hariston? All of which have had NBA careers at some point or another?
Let's be real, Roy took what he could get last class, with the exception of Jalek. Rankings aren't everything, but they are generally accurate. Roy says himself, talent usually wins. And if you don't get the best talent, it catches up to you.
Which is why I'm very thankful for Nas, Coby and Rechon coming in next year, as well as the 2019 class which looks promising thus far.
How does he not have a spot on the roster if Platek is on the team, as well as barely top 200 recruit Huffman?No. He doesn't.
Yes. He would.
Yes. He would.
Yes. He would.
No. Read my post above Specific needs. Its not just about numbersHow does he not have a spot on the roster if Platek is on the team, as well as barely top 200 recruit Huffman?
Yes. Really.Really? I'm doing my very best to not laugh and take your post seriously but... really??
Platek is not a liability.On our most talented teams under Roy? Aka 2005, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2012, 2016, and 2017? Platek and Huffman wouldn’t even be on the team because there would be no need for them. Currently, they are both liabilities in ACC play.
Well he certainly isn't a strength and there is no shot he would get in games except for blowouts on the Hansbrough era teamsPlatek is not a liability.
"Polished" is a good word. The only thing lacking in his offensive game right now is consistent footwork --- the type of stuff he will learn pronto at Carolina.
Naz was my #1 priority for this class for a while, and he just keeps getting better as he polishes his skills. The rest of the right stuff --- instinct, awareness, presence and motor --- has always been there and quickly recognizable to the educated eye as elite. That's why his stock continues to rise as his polish catches up with his enormous born talent.
Thank you, Jeff Lebo for helping steer him to the Hill.
What role did Lebo play?? Speaking of Lebo what's the word on his son who is a just a sophomore now???
My dad is dead. Anything else inane you want to say?My dad can beat up your dad.
Platek is not a liability.
From what I’ve seen, when he goes up against longer, more athletic people his size, he struggles. Therefore, his minutes need to be limited. And, as I’ve said a million times, this is what happens when your recruiting takes a hit.
Same stuff I read two years ago about two of our guys who are starting and excelling now. Not surprised.From what I’ve seen, when he goes up against longer, more athletic people his size, he struggles. Therefore, his minutes need to be limited. And, as I’ve said a million times, this is what happens when your recruiting takes a hit.
Same stuff I read two years ago about two of our guys who are starting and excelling now. Not surprised.
For me it's not a question if he's a liability right now. He is what he is at this point, mostly invisible on the court, which is fine and expected.
My issue is I really can't believe we have a supposed basketball genius actually arguing assuredly that platek would get playing time of any significance on teams that had guys like pj Hairston and McDonald's all Americans as 9th and 10th men in the rotation. It's mind boggling. Platek wouldn't even be on those rosters.
Same stuff I read two years ago about two of our guys who are starting and excelling now. Not surprised.