... even if it meant putting an end to...If I had been alive at that time, I would not have taken the life of a single person.
the absolute inhumane slaughter of human beings
nice cliche.
... even if it meant putting an end to...
So in summary, you'd sit idly by while the Holocaust was taking place, even though you potentially had the power to end it, all so you could declare your own innocence.
I can't think of a better example to demonstrate the love of self that pervades your poasting history here.
I was going to point out this exact same thing after reading his response. I was also going to throw in an example (Boko Haram) from today. But instead of all that, I've decided to do what he does and just troll him back.... even if it meant putting an end to...
So in summary, you'd sit idly by while the Holocaust was taking place, even though you potentially had the power to end it, all so you could declare your own innocence.
I can't think of a better example to demonstrate the love of self that pervades your poasting history here.
Killing people is not my thing. Sorry if you disagree. I don't have the power to end it. Do you think it's ended? Last time I checked, wars go on and on and on and genocide goes on and on and on. Killing people in order to get people to stop killing each other seems to really be working well. Keep up the good work.... even if it meant putting an end to...
So in summary, you'd sit idly by while the Holocaust was taking place, even though you potentially had the power to end it, all so you could declare your own innocence.
I can't think of a better example to demonstrate the love of self that pervades your poasting history here.
Nope: "If I had been alive at that time, I would not have taken the life of a single person."I believe he said he wouldn't slaughter people, he never said he'd sit by and allow others to do it if he had the ability to stop it.
It's not my thing either. I don't disagree. And of course you don't have the power, WWII ended 70 years ago.Killing people is not my thing. Sorry if you disagree. I don't have the power to end it.
I would have been a medic, I suppose. I would have helped roll bandages and been a conscientious objector, whatever. But, I'm not going to engage in taking other peoples' lives. That's exactly what Nazis were doing. I don't see it as you do, that's all. You're picking sides and teams, as if they're somehow different, or one is better or worse.Nope: "If I had been alive at that time, I would not have taken the life of a single person."
That's more of self-defense. I'd ask them to shoot me, I suppose.It's not my thing either. I don't disagree. And of course you don't have the power, WWII ended 70 years ago.
Who do you love besides yourself, strum? A sibling? Your mother? Let's say a gunman holds a pistol to your mother's head. You have a loaded gun. The gunman tells you that he's going to count down from 10, and either you shoot him or he shoots your mother when he reaches 0. What do you do?
That wasn't a choice. Answer the question.That's more of self-defense. I'd ask them to shoot me, I suppose.
I guess you forgot the question. Here it is again.No, you're ignoring my answer.
Please tell me a viable alternative solution to the wars I mentioned. Not a theory or there are no winners, everything is relative, we need to evolve solution. Something that actually works in real life.
This is interesting. I love the lengths you're willing to go to to try and get me to kill someone. And, then, if I refuse to kill another person, you call me selfish! You're a real prize. I've learned a lot about you in this thread.That wasn't a choice. Answer the question.
10.
That I'm better at trolling than you? You're damn right I am.This is interesting. I love the lengths you're willing to go to to try and get me to kill someone. And, then, if I refuse to kill another person, you call me selfish! You're a real prize. I've learned a lot about you in this thread.
Yay for you. I'm not trolling anyone. Never have.That I'm better at trolling than you? You're damn right I am.
We all pay our respects in our own way.@strummingram
I dont consider paying respect to be "worshipping the state". Holy crap talk about hyperbole! I consider it .....well paying respect to the ideals and concepts set forth in the constitution and the people who died to enable us to live by them. I agree with u on a lot of stuff others dont but you've lost me on this one.
Nope: "If I had been alive at that time, I would not have taken the life of a single person."
Ok. Can you answer the question I asked strum? Can you give me a viable solution to those wars that results in no deaths?Exactly! You Do not have to kill someone to save someone.
Tell me, how would you have ended the Holocaust without killing anyone?Exactly! You Do not have to kill someone to save someone.
So would that have been your response to the Holocaust? "Millions of Jews are dying, but it's okay because now they're freed from this world and are eternal."If that man kills my mother, she is freed from this world and is eternal.
Strum like Charlie Sheen probably doesn't believe the Holocaust happened.So would that have been your response to the Holocaust? "Millions of Jews are dying, but it's okay because now they're freed from this world and are eternal."
Your logic doesn't pass muster. You can't talk out of one side of your mouth about the sanctity of human life, while out of the other tacitly supporting the murder of millions of people. If you revere life and have a conscience, intervention is the only choice. Otherwise you're a total cretin or a sanctimonious windbag, and neither is a particularly good look.
This shall henceforth be known as the "Yeah, but you'd let your mom die" dilemma. I hope you think about it every time the Star-Spangled Banner is played.
Pay attention. I've already asked that question. This thread is bad enough without reposts.Tell me, how would you have ended the Holocaust without killing anyone?
I've been thinking the same thing. To me, just allowing someone to die unjustly when you have the ability to stop it isn't much better than killing the person yourself. I wonder how allowing someone to unjustly die fits with the "love thy neighbor" and "help the helpless" scenario. Guess the real world is not black and white.Your logic doesn't pass muster. You can't talk out of one side of your mouth about the sanctity of human life, while out of the other tacitly supporting the murder of millions of people. If you revere life and have a conscience, intervention is the only choice. Otherwise you're a total cretin or a sanctimonious windbag, and neither is a particularly good look.
Sorry, didn't see that until after I poasted. Since chick is still insisting you don't have to kill anyone to save lives, I thought it would be helpful to pose a specific, slam-dunk example like the Holocaust.Pay attention. I've already asked that question. This thread is bad enough without reposts.
All is forgiven, but don't let it happen again.Sorry, didn't see that until after I poasted. Since chick is still insisting you don't have to kill anyone to save lives, I thought it would be helpful to pose a specific, slam-dunk example like the Holocaust.
It won't happen again.
Show me where I am "supporting the murder of millions of people." Because I'm not eager to murder people who are already murdering people? The ability to conceive of murdering people as being "acceptable" is what I'm trying to eliminate. Engaging in it, to stop OTHER MURDERERS from murdering... makes me a murderer. I'm helping to perpetuate the thing. It accomplishes the opposite. It allows it to go on and on.So would that have been your response to the Holocaust? "Millions of Jews are dying, but it's okay because now they're freed from this world and are eternal."
Your logic doesn't pass muster. You can't talk out of one side of your mouth about the sanctity of human life, while out of the other tacitly supporting the murder of millions of people. If you revere life and have a conscience, intervention is the only choice. Otherwise you're a total cretin or a sanctimonious windbag, and neither is a particularly good look.
This shall henceforth be known as the "Yeah, but you'd let your mom die" dilemma. I hope you think about it every time the Star-Spangled Banner is played.
Actually the result is the same. People die no matter what you do or don't do in that situation. It's just a matter of how many die. The only difference is you don't participate. I'm still interested in hearing a viable alternative from you though.Engaging in it, to stop OTHER MURDERERS from murdering... makes me a murderer. I'm helping to perpetuate the thing. It accomplishes the opposite. It allows it to go on and on.
A viable alternative doesn't exist for you. It begins with YOU. Can you justify killing another human being? If so, then there is no alternative needed. It's working just fine. Enjoy the success.Actually the result is the same. People die no matter what you do or don't do in that situation. It's just a matter of how many die. The only difference is you don't participate. I'm still interested in hearing a viable alternative from you though.
The quandary about your mom is no different than any other game theory that would be discussed in an introductory political science class. And the Holocaust was a terrible reality, not a fantasy.Your scenarios are fantasies. And, they're based in an ironic failure.
I never said the Holocaust was a fantasy. The Holocaust was allowed and created because people back then thought like you think now- it's okay to kill some people in certain situations, based on certain criteria. It's just a matter of degree. I'm merely pointing out the relativism.The quandary about your mom is no different than any other game theory that would be discussed in an introductory political science class. And the Holocaust was a terrible reality, not a fantasy.
The only ironic failure is your absolutism.
So you can't give me what you think is a viable alternative? I'm open to listening if you will tell me one. The only restriction I would put on your answer is that some theory based on us changing our way of thinking in the future doesn't qualify as a solution. I'm talking about an event in the past. What we evolve into doesn't help with past events.A viable alternative doesn't exist for you. It begins with YOU. Can you justify killing another human being? If so, then there is no alternative needed. It's working just fine. Enjoy the success.