Wait now, you allege that there was no course and then suggest shady because Crowder graded some of the work? Kinda crazy to say no course existed and yet work was required else grading said work would not have been required? Your theory implodes on itself right there.
OK, so you admit there was a class, is it your belief that all classes must meet weekly on some type of preset schedule? Can you point to any NCAA bylaw, any NCAA rule or regulation that mandates how often classes must meet in front of a professor? Did you not know that there are many types of classes that pretty much every D-1 school utilizes and many of the UN-CONVENTIONAL find a LOT of athletes involved because they allow scholarship athletes to meet the demands of their sport as well as the requirements of eligibility? Did you know that? LOL
Example, there are independant study classes, directed reading classes, online classes that UNC has used, that are used by Ky athletes, duke athletes, all D-1 programs. Can ya guess what every single one of those types of classes have in common, they do not meet in a class room on a regular schedule in front of a professor. Did ya know that a class can be originally set as one type of class and find it change to a more un-conventional class later, did ya know that, did ya know that can happen at Kentucky as well?
You tried to throw some shade on the department appointing Crowder, and AA in that department, to grade the work? Do you believe that ONLY professors or dept heads are the only ones that grade work turned in for a class? Do you really think that is how it works at Ky or any other major college? College profs rarely grade course work, they delegate that to their staff, like Ms Crowder. You do realize that college proffers don't not go about their job like a middle school teacher does, you do realize that right?
"There is no mention of athletic department collusion in the article which s specifically mentioned in the 3rd NOA." and yet the original ANOA mentioned no "collusion", have not fully read the new ANOA but is ther word collusion used there? Even if it were, it was only added when the statements of why the original ANOA did not use such language was disallowed by your SEC commish on PROCEDURAL grounds? Wonder why your SEC commish didn't want the inclusion of the reasoning the committee didn't feel they could use language in any way referring to collusion? Without the reasoning being shared with the committee, there was no explaination of why the original wording was as it was?
But you go right ahead making your baseless allegations while beginning your statement with the "I come in peace" BC, beter know what ya talking about next time!
Last edited by a moderator:
