Similar to how a good college AD always has a list of coaches that they'd like to hire if necessary, I'm thinking it might be a good idea for me to work on my new team to pull for list, just in case.
Side note when I type in Diddy my phone wants to change it to sissy. Ha.
Anyway. Diddy wants to purchase the “North Carolina Panthers”. And his first order of business is to sign Kap and have him and Cam compete for the starting job.
Sounds like a solid prospect.
Here you go. The committee idea would be awesome. I might actually have to start watching the NFL again if they did that.Everyone with the “i dont know what a catch is” whining. Yes we do precisely know what a catch is. U just dont agree with the rule maybe but the nfl is very clear in defining a catch and very consistent in enforcing it. And the thing is...exactly as reflected on espn this morning...when ex receivers or anyone in general are told “okay so if the rule is bad tell us what the new rule should be”....THEY NEVER CAN ANSWER. There were two ex nfl receivers on this morning and NEITHER would answer the question. Both just kept blabbing about how stupid the rule is. Well if its that stupid TELL US WHAT IT SHOULD BE!!!! So i would be interested in knowing if any of u guys can come with a legal def of a catch that would withstand slow mo replay scrutiny. Cause to me...the present rule makes sense.
Ball in hands, 2 feet in. The end. No "football moves" no "survive the ground." None of that bullshit.Everyone with the “i dont know what a catch is” whining. Yes we do precisely know what a catch is. U just dont agree with the rule maybe but the nfl is very clear in defining a catch and very consistent in enforcing it. And the thing is...exactly as reflected on espn this morning...when ex receivers or anyone in general are told “okay so if the rule is bad tell us what the new rule should be”....THEY NEVER CAN ANSWER. There were two ex nfl receivers on this morning and NEITHER would answer the question. Both just kept blabbing about how stupid the rule is. Well if its that stupid TELL US WHAT IT SHOULD BE!!!! So i would be interested in knowing if any of u guys can come with a legal def of a catch that would withstand slow mo replay scrutiny. Cause to me...the present rule makes sense.
Side note when I type in Diddy my phone wants to change it to sissy. Ha.
Anyway. Diddy wants to purchase the “North Carolina Panthers”. And his first order of business is to sign Kap and have him and Cam compete for the starting job.
Sounds like a solid prospect.
Ball in hands, 2 feet in. The end. No "football moves" no "survive the ground." None of that bullshit.
Ball in hands. Two feet down.
Here you go. The committee idea would be awesome. I might actually have to start watching the NFL again if they did that.
Please let this happen. As much as I think Cam is a dink, once Diddy buys the "North Carolina Panthers" and returns Kaep to his "rightful" spot as an NFL starting quarterback... maybe the Pats will sign Cam as the replacement for Brady now that we dealt Jimmy G away.
Obviously good news for the rest of the NFC South, but the entertainment level for the rest of the league will be nice too.
2 feet = 2 knees = butt = forearm. Same as exists now.Yea but if you’re hit and feet dont get to hit the ground? Then when u do hit the ground u juggle the ball?
Everyone with the “i dont know what a catch is” whining. Yes we do precisely know what a catch is. U just dont agree with the rule maybe but the nfl is very clear in defining a catch and very consistent in enforcing it. And the thing is...exactly as reflected on espn this morning...when ex receivers or anyone in general are told “okay so if the rule is bad tell us what the new rule should be”....THEY NEVER CAN ANSWER. There were two ex nfl receivers on this morning and NEITHER would answer the question. Both just kept blabbing about how stupid the rule is. Well if its that stupid TELL US WHAT IT SHOULD BE!!!! So i would be interested in knowing if any of u guys can come with a legal def of a catch that would withstand slow mo replay scrutiny. Cause to me...the present rule makes sense.
I know, it was the first google result. What's your point? Don't tell me you think the NFL cared about its players hitting women until it became the fad du jour of society. I think yourThat was also 2 years ago
2 feet = 2 knees = butt = forearm. Same as exists now.
Catch. It's not that hard.So if u go airborne and secure ball with both hands and tuck it then get hit and hit the ground and lose the ball without both feet touching...
@TarHeelNation11 you watch a lot more college football than most of us: does this crap happen in college much, if at all?Ball in hands, 2 feet in. The end. No "football moves" no "survive the ground." None of that bullshit.
Ball in hands. Two feet down.
Well technically, he made the mistakes years ago and paid millions of dollars in settlements that required NDAs so they never saw the light of day.Next time you make a mistake, make sure you sell your most prized possession.
Well technically, he made the mistakes years ago and paid millions of dollars in settlements that required NDAs so they never saw the light of day.
I wondered the same thing, lol. While I certainly appreciate the victims' side of the story, they were obviously satisfied with the outcome or they wouldn't have taken the money and signed the NDAs. That all makes me wonder what business it is of the NFL to open cases that have already been resolved to the satisfaction of all parties involved.Looks like he's owed his millions of dollars back then.
Didn't SI write an article that prompted the investigation?I wondered the same thing, lol. While I certainly appreciate the victims' side of the story, they were obviously satisfied with the outcome or they wouldn't have taken the money and signed the NDAs. That all makes me wonder what business it is of the NFL to open cases that have since been resolved to the satisfaction of all parties involved.
To address this question and your other question, there's multiple answers. Short answer is no it doesn't seem to happen as much in college (at least in noteworthy games).@TarHeelNation11 you watch a lot more college football than most of us: does this crap happen in college much, if at all?
I would be hoping that it leaked for that very reason. I would be sitting there with popcorn just waiting for the DBs and WRs to fight after a close call. It would be better than the game itself.Oh lord that would be HORRIBLE! Can u imagine the blowback when it leaks out how certain people voted on game changing catches? Would be entertaining though!
"Get on your feet and make some noise for your Austinnnnnn PANTHERSSSSS!"So he’s stepping down immediately now.
So he’s stepping down immediately now.
Is he selling the team immediately, or not? I hope not, as I doubt Diddy/Kaep/etc. could get the necessary funding to buy it that quickly. And NFL fans have earned the right to watch that ownership group crash and burn in magnificent fashion.
No just stepping down from day to day operations. Selling after season best I can tell.
I think they would overlook it because he's black. After everything that has happened over the last couple of years, the NFL would love to have a minority owner. Unless he has beat on women his criminal past won't matter in today's climate.Dammit. That will give the NFL long enough to realize the legal run-ins Diddy has had and will presumably cause them to block his bid to prevent further bad images for the league.
Yep.I think they would overlook it because he's black. After everything that has happened over the last couple of years, the NFL would love to have a minority owner. Unless he has beat on women his criminal past won't matter in today's climate.
I think they would overlook it because he's black. After everything that has happened over the last couple of years, the NFL would love to have a minority owner. Unless he has beat on women his criminal past won't matter in today's climate.
Now that is some bullshit right there. If some of those other hits only get one game, then two games for that hit is too much. And TD was obviously remorseful over on the bench. Unlike gronk, who acts like a ****ing retarded Frankenstein, coulda paralyzed that dude and only got one game.In other Panthers news, Thomas Davis suspended two games and will appeal.
I like it. He could bring in Marquise Williams as starting QB and Elijah Hood as starting runningback.Has Jordan expressed any interest? I bet the NFL would love for him to make a bid.
I don't see how anyone can justify Davis getting two games right after Gronk got one. I mean Davis did light him up but at least it was part of an actual football play not an extracurricular WWE audition. WT actual FNow that is some bullshit right there. If some of those other hits only get one game, then two games for that hit is too much. And TD was obviously remorseful over on the bench. Unlike gronk, who acts like a ****ing retarded Frankenstein, coulda paralyzed that dude and only got one game.
I don't see how anyone can justify Davis getting two games right after Gronk got one. I mean Davis did light him up but at least it was part of an actual football play not an extracurricular WWE audition. WT actual F
Yep, that's the NFL.Now that is some bullshit right there. If some of those other hits only get one game, then two games for that hit is too much. And TD was obviously remorseful over on the bench. Unlike gronk, who acts like a ****ing retarded Frankenstein, coulda paralyzed that dude and only got one game.
Woad's head would explode if MW made an NFL roster.I like it. He could bring in Marquise Williams as starting QB and Elijah Hood as starting runningback.
I don't see how anyone can justify Davis getting two games right after Gronk got one. I mean Davis did light him up but at least it was part of an actual football play not an extracurricular WWE audition. WT actual F
there's no place for assaulting defenseless people, even in football.
TD will hit somebody HARD, but over the years I don't recall seeing him headhunt or take deliberate cheap shots. I could be wrong and my memory is fading.someone on the radio mentioned he was a repeat offender?...is that true?
No, he isn't.someone on the radio mentioned he was a repeat offender?...is that true?
Because NFL punishments are levied by this process:I don't see how anyone can justify Davis getting two games right after Gronk got one. I mean Davis did light him up but at least it was part of an actual football play not an extracurricular WWE audition. WT actual F