at one time I thought @strummingram was a real wit, but turns out I was only half right.Yep. Not sure why Strum thinks some of his comments are funny when no one else does.
HAR HAR HAR HAR HAR
I kid , I kid
at one time I thought @strummingram was a real wit, but turns out I was only half right.Yep. Not sure why Strum thinks some of his comments are funny when no one else does.
They're all halfwits.Kill babies and there are less people and less demand for food and gas. Makes sense.
But remember, it's only the republicans that are nominating "halfwits" according to some poasters here.
I'm sure the schools have him beat.
Yea like believing in a “plandemic”
They're all halfwits.
Fixed it for you. Strum is a legend in his own mind.Yep. Not sure why Strum thinkssomemost of his comments are funny when no one else does.
“All” being all politicians? If so, I disagree. Some are halfwits, like AOC. But some are quite intelligent. Most have perfected the art of enriching themselves at the expense of their constituents, especially members of Congress. And that’s both parties!They're all halfwits.
Simply scare tactics that you and the Squad accuse the Pubs of using. Again, if you want to know what the Dems are up to, just look at what they accuse Pubs of doing. You’re so transparent. You said you’d be happy to address inflation, soaring crime, soaring costs of gas/food, the invasion at the southern border, Biden’s dementia, etc… But you never do. You talk about right wing extremists, how about discussing left wing extremists like Antifa and BLM? You and the members of our Squad are just as much extreme leftists as the Squad in Washington.
YOU are the one mischaracterizing. I have pointed out that the dem party is the one that won't take no-restriction abortion off the table, and YOU are the one who supports the dems in knee-jerk fashion without fail. If you vote for a dem, any dem, you are voting for no-restriction abortion because when a bill comes up LIKE THE ONE THAT NEARLY PASSED already that allows abortion up to the time of birth, the dems will at least largely support it.
But you think you're going to slither away by implying...not actually saying....that you might not vote for A pol who directly favors no-limit abortions. You fail A).
And as I knew you would, you are going to compare crushing the skull of of a baby at birth to highly restrictive abortion laws and think you're making points. You are not. To begin with, we know that you will sneak in some innuendo and insinuation regarding these abortion laws. Remember when you tried to sell us on the horrors of the woman being denied abortion medication that she needed for her health, when it turned out the 'horror' was that she had to wait ONE DAY for the request to be processed? Same goes with the abortion laws. Until you factually demonstrate that they actually deny all abortions in all circumstances, I call bullshit on you just from experience.
In the case of the Ohio girl, she was able to get her abortion albeit with a little trouble, and I say good for her, under those circumstances. But then you and the other knee-jerks weren't satisfied with that and pilloried the State of Indiana for harassing the doctor for providing the abortion when it turns out that she was rather being investigated for improper reporting of the event, having been a problem before and having lied about the facts in this instance.
B) Election denial? Are you seriously going to deny seeing the video posted here recently of the denial when Trump was elected? GTF out of here with that weak shit. Election denial seems to be a tie game at worst. But election denial compared to flooding the country with MILLIONS of illegals? GTFO. You want to include the near-toppling of our government and plunge into Nazism that occurred on that Jan. 6? Be my guest, because by the time we can get those current jackasses out of office, we'll all be wearing sombreros and having tacos for breakfast. You lose B)
C) firing the civil service. Really? Civil servants have been subjected to political favoritism since politics was invented. This isn't even worth responding to. C) no contest
D) and here's the one we all knew was coming. The subversive injection of Christian Nationalism into our bureaucracy. OH MY GOD NO, say it can't be true. Anything but putting Christians into the government. Line up a thousand newborn babies on the railroad track, but don't you dare let a Christian influence anything, as if that is going to happen anyway. What would you think of maybe providing a single example of how Christian Nationalism is ruining...nay, affecting...your life. D) predictably ridiculous, you lose again..
You might have misunderstood, and if so I apologize. I was asking for extremes of the right that compare to the extremes of the left. You can try again if you'd like, but if you'd rather leave your offering as the joke that it is, I'll accept it. It's a good one.
Yes, I know you think all Dems are halfwits and Republicans aren't. Very rational of you.Fixed it for you. Strum is a legend in his own mind.
“All” being all politicians? If so, I disagree. Some are halfwits, like AOC. But some are quite intelligent. Most have perfected the art of enriching themselves at the expense of their constituents, especially members of Congress. And that’s both parties!
"Alas, it falls on deaf ears. I shouldn't have expected less."As usual, you make the absolute dumbest false equivalencies about opinions I don't actually have and will make up a million different excuses and logical fallacies to deny there could be ANYTHING wrong with your side of the isle. I didn't lose anything. You just made up excuses. Or rather, you stuck your head in the sand when it didn't go along with your perception of the world.
Alas, it falls on deaf ears. I shouldn't have expected less.
you might have missed the line where he says he 's referring to both parties. But it's OK, I'm sure you feel better now.Yes, I know you think all Dems are halfwits and Republicans aren't. Very rational of you.
I know what he typed...I also know what he meant.you might have missed the line where he says he 's referring to both parties. But it's OK, I'm sure you feel better now.
Example C: Firing the entire civil service
![]()
Trump Has Endorsed a Plan to Purge the Civil Service of ‘Rogue Bureaucrats’
Former Trump staffers have said they have identified 50,000 federal employees who would be ousted under a new iteration of Schedule F during the next Republican administration.www.govexec.com
awesome. How about letting us run all of our postings through you so you can tell us what we really mean.I know what he typed...I also know what he meant.
Have you even watched the video above? Basically every important person in the administration and the MSM saying the 2016 election was stolen, that Trump was an illegitimate President. And “crime is sooo horrible”. You’re the one who hasn’t been reading or paying attention, not me. I try to read every post here and watch every video, even if I don’t agree with the poster’s stance. You’re the walking CNN poster boy. You are as nutty as AOC, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley, and Rashida Tlaib.The only scare tactics being used here are the ones from MAGA world- telling people Biden isn't President, the 2020 election was stolen, Democrats want to kill babies, that crime is sooo horrible, and that giving a shred of decency to transgender people will bring about the end times.
You don't f**king read, Arch. I've made my opinions on those issues known before. You're a walking, talker poster child from something out of a Rush Limbaugh episode. A person with the political nuance of a five year old.
So, before you go off on another dumb tangent about how I'm 'just as bad as the Squad' why don't you try asking me what I really think about these topics, and I'll give you honest answers. Scouts honor.
Well, democrats do want to kill babies; the 2020 election was stolen; Biden is a criminal who has been taking bribes from our adversaries for years; the spike in crime rates is horrible, and grooming children is wrong.The only scare tactics being used here are the ones from MAGA world- telling people Biden isn't President, the 2020 election was stolen, Democrats want to kill babies, that crime is sooo horrible, and that giving a shred of decency to transgender people will bring about the end times.
You don't f**king read, Arch. I've made my opinions on those issues known before. You're a walking, talker poster child from something out of a Rush Limbaugh episode. A person with the political nuance of a five year old.
So, before you go off on another dumb tangent about how I'm 'just as bad as the Squad' why don't you try asking me what I really think about these topics, and I'll give you honest answers. Scouts honor.
But I get your point, since I did not expect more in your reply. I actually addressed the points you offered and exposed them for how ridiculous they were as examples of extremes that compare to leftist extremes. You made no effort to do the same, which is what I expected. You say I made excuses? How was I making excuses when I made factual comparisons.
Here's another challenge. Tell me one thing I offered that isn't true, and don't just say or insinuate that it isn't true. SHOW ME, I'm from Monongahela. Or Milwaukee, or some damn place where you have to show them.
Give me an example of a false equivalency I made. How about a logical fallacy. Give me anything that resembles actual rebuttal and not buttheadedness.
Pray tell. Can you name a single example of "religious extremism" by way of so-called Christian nationalists? You act like Christians are lurking around every corner just waiting to attack people or some such. It's absurd.Your response was filled with outright falsehoods for one thing. That Indiana did not lie nor did she improperly report anything. It was the Indiana AG in all his anti-abortion absolutist glory, so furious he couldn't do anything to prevent or punish her for performing a legal medical procedure, that tried to find any minuscule way to punish her. That's what these crazy ass people are like. For a good portion of the pro life movement it's about control, not addressing the actual problem.
I have no idea what millions of 'illegals' coming into the country has to do with January 6th or how it relates at all. But it seems a bit sus to me you're more concerned about wearing sombreros and eating tacos (both of which are awesome) then the actual democratic peaceful transfer of power being violated. Once more, you deflect using an topic that has nothing to do with my claim.
You simply deflected on the civil service. You don't see a slight problem with a man single handedly weaponizing the entire bureaucratic aspect of our government to his advantage?
And lastly, what does abortion have to do with the rise in Christian Nationalism? 'Lining up babies on a track'. Seriously, what kind of BS is that? I know you didn't read the NYT article I posted but the evidence is right there. Multiple far right, MAGA candidates have a warped view of Christianity in this country and how it relates to implementing the law. Doug Mastriano, MTG, Lauren Boebert, not to mention the numerous evangelicals quoted in the article. The Supreme Court has made numerous decisions recently that erode a necessary border between religion and public life. That will continue for another decade or more.
It's the pitfall of religious extremism, which you yourself have admitted to being against. A person becomes so convinced that who they are and what they're about is godly, they think it should apply to everyone. These people do not think a person like me is even worthy of existing. Or if I do, I should exist according to their roles, their scripture, their divinely inspired interpretation of the United States. As a trans person, I have some skin in the game when it comes to my personal safety.
So no, I don't see what abortion has to do with a rise in right wing Christian candidates running for office.
no, no, no, it's an abomination....Trump might somehow be involved.About Government Executive
Government Executive is government's business news daily and the premier digital destination for senior leaders in the federal government's departments and agencies. Our readers are the high-ranking civilian and military officials who are responsible for defending the nation and carrying out the laws that define the government's role in our economy and society.
Our essential editorial mission is to cover the business of the federal government and its huge departments and agencies -- dozens of which dwarf the largest institutions in the private sector.
Specific editorial goals include:
-- Covering developments affecting the organization and management of the executive branch.
-- Helping federal executives and their agencies improve the quality of the services they provide by reporting on management innovations.
-- Explaining agencies' problems and failures in a way that offer lessons about pitfalls to avoid.
-- Helping to improve the image of the public service by teaching our non-government readers about the challenges federal officials confront.
Government Executive is a portfolio brand of GovExec, the market-leading information platform that catalyzes the government mission, empowering the full government ecosystem to achieve its missions through data that informs, media that connects, and marketing services that activate.
______________
I couldn't imagine that outfit having any biases in regards to getting rid of useless federal bureaucrats doing little more than collecting a paycheck on the taxpayer's dime....
Now you’re a mind reader. Impressive. I stated I thought 85-90% of Congress is corrupt. A man who can read minds should realize that mathematically that means at least 35-40% of those are Pubs. Actually, I think that 85-90% of both parties are corrupt. Believe that or not, I couldn’t care less.I know what he typed...I also know what he meant.
Yeah but 82% of all statistics are made up.Now you’re a mind reader. Impressive. I stated I thought 85-90% of Congress is corrupt. A man who can read minds should realize that mathematically that means at least 35-40% of those are Pubs. Actually, I think that 85-90% of both parties are corrupt. Believe that or not, I couldn’t care less.
Exactly the response I’d expect from you. Do you believe 85-90% of Congress is corrupt? More? Less? Both parties or just Pubs?Yeah but 82% of all statistics are made up.
being purposely stupid is no argument. I have to go for now but I will take this apart later. So for now, remember the point was to show me some extremes of the right that were as terrible as those of the left. I was not making point-to-point comparisons and that I think should have been obvious to anyone not trying to squirm out of admitting that they are wrong. I was comparing your extremes to mine, and showing that any of your so-called extremes pale in comparison to the ones I offered.Your response was filled with outright falsehoods for one thing. That Indiana did not lie nor did she improperly report anything. It was the Indiana AG in all his anti-abortion absolutist glory, so furious he couldn't do anything to prevent or punish her for performing a legal medical procedure, that tried to find any minuscule way to punish her. That's what these crazy ass people are like. For a good portion of the pro life movement it's about control, not addressing the actual problem.
I have no idea what millions of 'illegals' coming into the country has to do with January 6th or how it relates at all. But it seems a bit sus to me you're more concerned about wearing sombreros and eating tacos (both of which are awesome) then the actual democratic peaceful transfer of power being violated. Once more, you deflect using an topic that has nothing to do with my claim.
You simply deflected on the civil service. You don't see a slight problem with a man single handedly weaponizing the entire bureaucratic aspect of our government to his advantage?
And lastly, what does abortion have to do with the rise in Christian Nationalism? 'Lining up babies on a track'. Seriously, what kind of BS is that? I know you didn't read the NYT article I posted but the evidence is right there. Multiple far right, MAGA candidates have a warped view of Christianity in this country and how it relates to implementing the law. Doug Mastriano, MTG, Lauren Boebert, not to mention the numerous evangelicals quoted in the article. The Supreme Court has made numerous decisions recently that erode a necessary border between religion and public life. That will continue for another decade or more.
It's the pitfall of religious extremism, which you yourself have admitted to being against. A person becomes so convinced that who they are and what they're about is godly, they think it should apply to everyone. These people do not think a person like me is even worthy of existing. Or if I do, I should exist according to their roles, their scripture, their divinely inspired interpretation of the United States. As a trans person, I have some skin in the game when it comes to my personal safety.
So no, I don't see what abortion has to do with a rise in right wing Christian candidates running for office.
The only scare tactics being used here are the ones from MAGA world- telling people Biden isn't President, the 2020 election was stolen, Democrats want to kill babies, that crime is sooo horrible, and that giving a shred of decency to transgender people will bring about the end times.
I have no idea what millions of 'illegals' coming into the country has to do with January 6th or how it relates at all. But it seems a bit sus to me you're more concerned about wearing sombreros and eating tacos (both of which are awesome) then the actual democratic peaceful transfer of power being violated. Once more, you deflect using an topic that has nothing to do with my claim.
like you'd allow a baby to escape the wombI'm not a democrat, but I guess I should be since I have set some baby traps around the yard and the neighborhood today.
being purposely stupid is no argument. I have to go for now but I will take this apart later. So for now, remember the point was to show me some extremes of the right that were as terrible as those of the left. I was not making point-to-point comparisons and that I think should have been obvious to anyone not trying to squirm out of admitting that they are wrong. I was comparing your extremes to mine, and showing that any of your so-called extremes pale in comparison to the ones I offered.
You actually want a real answer to this stupid topic?Exactly the response I’d expect from you. Do you believe 85-90% of Congress is corrupt? More? Less? Both parties or just Pubs?
I see you also suck at math.I stated I thought 85-90% of Congress is corrupt. A man who can read minds should realize that mathematically that means at least 35-40% of those are Pubs.
Must be time for The Golden Girls or Murder, She Wrote.I have to go for now but I will take this apart later.
It would definitely be hard to fit it in with his busy schedule of world travel and discussions with hundreds of medical experts.There’s a 0% chance that goober has actually read Orwell 😂
There’s a 0% chance that goober has actually read Orwell 😂
" I'm actually a registered Republican and have voted more that way than left in my life. "You actually want a real answer to this stupid topic?
I have no idea. I don't have the time nor the inclination to study every member of Congress to figure out if he/she is corrupt, a moron, or both. I don't give a shit about the Congressman from Oklahoma's 3rd district.
I do know that anyone who gets into politics today is a moron and/or in it for their own personal benefit because the job is terrible. Everyone hates each other, you have zero privacy, you get paid shit, and you have to cater to a base of people who you probably hate.
Also, funny that you assume I'd only think Republicans are corrupt. I'm actually a registered Republican and have voted more that way than left in my life. Just because I don't worship at the feet of the current leadership of the party made you assume otherwise. That's pretty telling about yourself Archer.
How about that, you asked a question about me but in the end, you learned something about you. That's beautiful.
it looks like @gunslingerdick has handled this quite adequately so for now I think I won't waste much more time watching you throw around the terms 'logical fallacy' and 'falsehoods' without any attempt at substantiation.being purposely stupid is no argument. I have to go for now but I will take this apart later. So for now, remember the point was to show me some extremes of the right that were as terrible as those of the left. I was not making point-to-point comparisons and that I think should have been obvious to anyone not trying to squirm out of admitting that they are wrong. I was comparing your extremes to mine, and showing that any of your so-called extremes pale in comparison to the ones I offered.
you don't see shit other than orange man bad, knee-jerk.Ah, I see where this is going. Well in that case, I await your response. Should be fun.
Again, no deflection. Politicization of the civil service simply isn't an issue worthy of inclusion in this discussion. But because it's all you have to offer, I'll say that I see no problem at all with pointing out the abject stupidity of implying that a president is only helping himself by trying to make our bureaucracy more responsive to the needs of the country. Just another indication of the blind hatred that motivates you.You simply deflected on the civil service. You don't see a slight problem with a man single handedly weaponizing the entire bureaucratic aspect of our government to his advantage?
And lastly, what does abortion have to do with the rise in Christian Nationalism? 'Lining up babies on a track'. Seriously, what kind of BS is that? I know you didn't read the NYT article I posted but the evidence is right there. Multiple far right, MAGA candidates have a warped view of Christianity in this country and how it relates to implementing the law. Doug Mastriano, MTG, Lauren Boebert, not to mention the numerous evangelicals quoted in the article. The Supreme Court has made numerous decisions recently that erode a necessary border between religion and public life. That will continue for another decade or more.
It's the pitfall of religious extremism, which you yourself have admitted to being against. A person becomes so convinced that who they are and what they're about is godly, they think it should apply to everyone. These people do not think a person like me is even worthy of existing. Or if I do, I should exist according to their roles, their scripture, their divinely inspired interpretation of the United States. As a trans person, I have some skin in the game when it comes to my personal safety.
So no, I don't see what abortion has to do with a rise in right wing Christian candidates running for office.