please God no. Seriously, no. I won't believe it.Am I the only one that sees it?
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
lol, and right on time, and just as I knew you would, here you are confirming the juvenile and ignorant part of my description of you.
Am I the only one that sees it?
My notifications alerted me that I was quoted in this poast. I don’t see it, no.
What am I supposed to see?
It was only a matter of time before Trump insulted VP Harris with a comment that he can’t walk back. 🤭
I just watched this. The idiot who set that up for him needs to be fired. I can see why he is backing out of the debate. Trump don't like strong women and strong women of color scares the shit out of him.
All the experts, in fact. They're all saying it "we had the highest normal rating". People tell me they had never seen anything more normal than those 4 years, probably ever.
but “just turned black a few years ago”???
it was a rebuttal to the “dei” question…that was just weird.
Last edited:
For Trump is was all about dodging the question Do you think Kamala Harris was a DEI hire?
Trump: Define DEI.
Journalist: Diversity, equality, inclusion.
Trump: Yeah, but define it.
Journalist: I just did.
I didn't know the whole quote. Just replying to what you posted. I'm guessing it was a bad attempt to compare it to the Elizabeth Warren situation.
You think this man and his daughter are sitting at the front or the back of the bus in a segregated South in 1960?
That was an old quote i accidentally didn’t delete at first. It’s not what you’re supposed to see but everyone. Well everyone that was here when for the beginning of this thread.
You can't blame his strategy advisers cuz he'll just ignore them.
He don’t like them? He really don’t?
Looks like you and Kamala have that same spontaneous black accent affliction.
It turns out his team ordered the Q&A to suddenly end about a half hour early, but by then it was too late. Much too late. The damage was done.
🤣
Well I’m trying to be clever but….(shut up bluetoe) I guess i’ll
Just have to say it plainly. A lot of people are annoyed by a certain new poster. Seems to me this new poster reminds me of a certain poster who was banned. His name is depicted in the meme.
Evidently trump said “fuk the black vote”
NABJ??? National Association of BLACK journalists? BLACK journalists??? That's a racist organization? Same goes for the NAACP! A bunch of racists!
see, i thought the new annoyed poster was the alter ego of a current poster just trying to have a conversation with himself on a message board because nobody gaf about current’s posts.
I got what you were trying to do, you just sounded drunk when you did it.
I know you're joking around, but I do wonder what the reaction would be to a National Association of White Journalist. Well, not really because I'm pretty sure what would happen.NABJ??? National Association of BLACK journalists? BLACK journalists??? That's a racist organization? Same goes for the NAACP! A bunch of racists!
I know you're joking around, but I do wonder what the reaction would be to a National Association of White Journalist. Well, not really because I'm pretty sure what would happen.
It would be considered racist AF to have any kind of WHITE organization, now. White men controlled this country completely for at least the first hundred years. And, they really controlled the next 100, for the most part, with some more noticeable exceptions in the last 50 years (maybe a little more if you start after WWII). It's hard to measure the impact of such a... head start? I understand why these organizations had to be created. They HAD to be created as separate from white people because most of America chose to be separate for a long time. Jim Crow laws, "separate but equal", white-supremacist bullshit like that.
I think it will be ideal when we, as a society, move beyond distinctions based on race/ethnicity/gender/sexual orientation. I think most individuals can get there quicker than the whole lot of us. It's very incremental, but it's getting there. I think (I hope), at some point, something like the NAACP will no longer be needed. Status quo is slow to change.
I finally watched the 36 minute exchange. I don't understand what was so bad, or different, about what he said that's any different from his usual shtick.
Well, it was obvious that the crowd was unimpressed. I'm surprised he would go on the stage. He never forgets to tell everyone how he's being cheated and mistreated.
And, I really wanna know who are these mothers andd ob-gyn's that are looking at newborn babies and then executing them? Who is taking a pregnancy to full term, going through the agony of labor, and then saying "You know what? I don't want it. Kill it, please?" How often is this actually happening?
Don't feel bad for not having the answer. I imagine psychologists a hundred years from now will still be trying to figure out what made this deranged psychopath tick.
excuse me Mr. Math Genius who once stupidly presumed that it was I who needed help with percentages....India represents 50% of her genes and Jamaica represents 50% of her genes and of that 50%, only 80.1 is African, according to you. So that results in 50% Indian, 40% African, and 10% other. So no, not African-American. INDIAN-American. Dolt.
Listing the words that comprise an acronym is not defining it, nimrod, it just indicates what words the individual letters stand for. The acronym DEI in this case represents something more than the individua words alone do, and that isn't necessarily self-explanatory. If someone asked me or some other intelligent person if someone was a DEI hire and the question was an obvious trap, as someone more intelligent than you I would definitely make the questioner say exactly what he meant by DEI, so that my answer could not easily be purposely misconstrued by some dipshit like you. In the environment we are currently operating in, word-twisting dipshits abound.
The questioner was the one dodging a question. What Trump was dodging was a shithead like you.
what frequency of occurrence would make it reprehensible to you?
I provided a link not too long ago proving that such legislation was created and almost passed. Maybe it's just me, but I can't help thinking that if legislation allowing full term execution almost passed, the concept was popular with that constituency.
Sorry, I neglected to get names. But to provide a little more sanity, suppose fer instance a woman was going to keep the baby because the father planned to marry her, but he backed out around the due date. And a bit more sanity for you...crushing a child's cranium a month before the due date is morally no different than waiting until it is being born. The fact is, you can not draw some line between moral and immoral in the case of terminating a healthy baby..
actually, I got it and I thought you were clever and fairly obvious. I responded like I did because, as I have pointed out before, in a former identity (mine) here Billy was kinda my pal. The thought of having the kind of exchange I had with the newb is kind of a punch in the gut if it's actually Billy.
Still... I don't think anything he said is going to hurt him as far as votes.
I was merely pointing out to @nctransplant that her Jamaican roots originated in Africa, something our biology major is apparently unaware of. I never made a distinction about what non-White category she falls under, so shove it up your ass, cracker.
Thanks for the heady explanation, captain obvious, but you should be telling it to Rachel Scott who I am simply quoting.
Idiot.
Any frequency. I find it very hard to believe that any licensed ob-gyn is going to toss a healthy, newborn baby, that they just assisted in delivering, into a wood-chipper... or whatever they use. A mother who just gave birth to her baby is not someone that is ready and eager to kill it.
That's pretty important. The rumor, or suggestion, or fabrication from whatever alt-right source isn't a very convincing source.
frankly, your alt-right comment is just the sort of idiocy I would expect from you. Alt-right is a synonym for anything you don't choose to believe. As I said, I linked proof that such legislation nearly passed in some northern State, and such legislation was at least proposed in our Congress. You can either search it or don't, but just disbelieving it out of hand is your choice and has nothing to do with the truth of the matter. I do agree it's hard to believe. What's even harder to believe is that so many dismiss concerns over such barbarism without bothering to take seriously the opposition to it.
and I was merely pointing out what a dolt you are at percentages, and in reaching wrong conclusions while erroneously trying to correct someone. You indicated that she should be categorized as AA by your calculations while plainly that is incorrect.
If I saw Rachel Scott actually quoted, I might. You didn't. Without quoting her, the words belong to you. And as such, it was your claim that Trump was dodging a question, and I dispelled that notion with a full explanation for you to learn by. Not that I would expect such a miracle.
So if I'm Captain Obvious, who are you to have to be schooled by me every time you post.
yes, definitely the front or the back. Doesn't look like the middle seats type to me.. Except where's the bus? And how do you know what the child identifies as.You think this man and his daughter are sitting at the front or the back of the bus in a segregated South in 1960?
Some northern state? The state of "what's it called?" And, it didn't pass... so, what I've been asking about NEVER HAPPENS. And, the US Congress also voted on some northern state's bill that said "doctors get to murder newborn babies if they decide the mother doesn't want it cuz the father bailed on her."
