You make your bimonthly appearance and you get OWNED! Hilarious!! Next time, come correct when you come
a-correcting.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
a-correcting.
so they are guilty of what, not registering as foreign agents? We aren't at war with Russia and they apparently weren't spying, how does that make them traitors? How does this compare to these individuals who were in government and were apparently acting as actual secret agents for China?
China ('ese?) secret agents
This has to be part of the MAGA dumbing down of America agenda. I wonder if it's included in Project 2025?
Going with “RUSSIA!” again, I see
Interesting strategy, Cotton. Let’s see if it works out for them.
2 thoughts on your poast.
Why did you feel the need to bold the parts of my quote that you changed?
And I don’t get the gif usage. What sentiment did you want it to convey?
That Flex Seal Tape is a powerful adhesive with a thick, flexible rubberized backing that conforms to virtually any shape and surface, even underwater.
Traitor
1. one who betrays another's trust or is false to an obligation or duty
Taking millions in Kremlin cash to secretly spread Russian propaganda makes them guilty of being lying a-holes, pretending to be patriots, doing a disservice to Americans who might see their content as legit. Or useful idiots if they are one of the duo who didn't know his boss was Putin.
They were part “a scheme to create and distribute content to U.S. audiences with hidden Russian government messaging".
Does it not bother you that foreign states are directing prominent conservative mouthpieces?
Don’t really know why I bolded the parts. To emphasize a theme maybe.
As for the gif I wanted to do something different than the typical “fify” so I went with a depiction of fixing something.
Fwiw I think you’re spot on with what our foreign policy should be concerning going to war
Last edited:
Lol “walzes for trump”
And yes I know it’s spelled differently
And yes I know it’s spelled differently
"Does it not bother you that foreign states are directing prominent conservative mouthpieces?"
not that much, and it bothers me more that you play fast and loose with the definition of 'traitor' while ignoring and actually rationalizing away a truer definition of 'traitor' as it applies to your influence-peddling political soulmate Biden.
As I said, we are not at war with Russia, and the word 'traitor' as normally applied refers to those who would either betray his country to an enemy or otherwise represent another country in a way that causes harm to his own country. Suppose they were representing France instead of Russia, and what they were promoting was French toast. Big deal. Maybe these guys were being duped into promoting the health benefits of borscht. Big deal. You need to show me what harm was done before you get me to shit a brick over your use of the word 'traitor'.
I am of course all ears...and a lot of that gigantic other thing, but I digress..
eta; LMAO. I actually didn't even know what RT was so I just educated myself. To make a long story short, this smacks of a return to the old tactic of accusations of 'collusion'. It smacks of weaponizing, yet again, government to combat a POV that opposes that of the ruling junta. What's laughable is that weak Russian propaganda is being vilified while our own media and our own politicians are busy pulling the wool over our own eyes. What's upsetting is that our own government and media institutions are engaging in the very practice that they vilify, and most of us are too blind to see that we have become our own enemy.
I strongly suspect that this has only become an issue of current magnitude because the dem power structure feels threatened. Of course we'll only hear about the threat to democracy coming from the outside, obscuring the greater threat coming from within.
Last edited:
maybe Project 2025 is mullet bait. Seems to be pretty effective.
Uh oh! Someone is upset that the Walz's won't join their team! And no @Heels Noir, I will not be a-coming to a bimonthly appearance with you. You keep your homo proclivities to yourself.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Let me see, people who have never served a day putting down people who have. Where have I heard that before?? You people are a lot more like Trump than you care to admit.
Serving in a branch of the military, even if you were forced to do so, doesn't mean you get to be an unfettered idiot free of criticism.
First and foremost, as noted previously, thank you for whatever service you performed in the military. To answer your inquiry, it wasn't just what you implied by your own post which has already been fully laid out by @bluetoe in case you really didn't realize it or were playing dumb. You posted this:
After some more postings by others including myself, you said the following:
Which was immediately, in the very next post, followed by this response:
Maybe this wasn't directed towards you, but considering prior posts, I thought it was. The implications were that you perhaps attempted to avoid the draft or at least failed to sign up when everyone else was volunteering. Once in, you didn't go to a location where a war was being fought or even to a foreign location. As such, you didn't gain any actual experience to speak on combat zones. Rather, you remained on a domestic base where your biggest danger was breaking an ankle on a hike or some accident taking place around all the equipment and weapons.
In other words, people who are loggers, work on an oil rig, or walk through any D controlled inner city have a higher percentage chance of being injured or killed. None of which makes you or them anymore qualified than anyone else to pontificate about what our policies should be or to make the types of decisions at the level of a president.
That's what was implied. If off base (pun intended), elaboration would be warranted if you care to share. But, your service is genuinely appreciated regardless, even if it was only as a worker bee. The machine doesn't work without that type of support.
This is the basic issue you keep falsely promoting. Having "served", as in yes or no, doesn't make one qualified to speak on military matters of a macro scale that are addressed by the president or others who decide major policies in a war zone. It all depends and is a much more involved issue than yes or no on the question of service. Are you an expert at such as things as field stripping an M-16, digging a latrine, rebuilding transmissions in tanks, or, did you rise to a level that you had the responsibility of determining troop numbers across the entire middle east region? Those are two very different individuals who both technically "served". The first is a grunt who has no special qualifications to speak on such matters while the latter would be considered somewhat of an expert and would have the background to do so.
For example, I personally played a ton of basketball in my life, at a high level, until medical issues stopped me from continuing to play with the young ins when I was almost 50. But I never played pro or even worked in that field. You may have only played baseball in little league. Based solely on those background facts, neither of us are more qualified than the other to be general managers of an NBA team. Having "served", yes or no, isn't the question you should be asking unless you are simply trying to promote yourself.
You asked, so I answered (unlike the inability of so many here). I don't know what your reply means to me. I set forth the implications about your actual experience and your lack of depth of service. If you don't care to provide further information, one can only infer that you can't or won't because it would expose you and show that you were attempting to falsely claim service experience beyond that which actually occurred. How very Walz of you.
You're doing that thing again where you either didn't understand the words, you redefine the words, you misstate and incorrectly summarize the words, or some combination of all the above.
Now, why don't you be a good little fella and post another poll or meme about orangemanbad?
Does it not bother you that we have an election where He Who Must Not Be Re-Elected is involved and we suddenly have the Biden controlled DOJ who starts screaming
RUSSIA, RUSSIA, RUSSIA
again?????
This thing may have legs or it may just be more election interference by our own government, but forgive me if I am at least suspicious. I'm not gonna go through the extensive list of hoaxes and other issues that have lost our trust. Seriously, do you not consider this timing at least convenient for our VP?
What was the point of posting this and @blazers being sad? Is this all about taking advantage of the optics because you are antifirearm? We haven't had enough time to get any details about this situation and what was really going on there. But no tragedy can happen without taking advantage of it, correct?
Did you even listen to what he wants to do? He said we need paper ballots and national forensic audits of our elections. Seems like that would be right up your guys' alley. Oh I see, he's pro trump, so he's bad, bad, bad. All bad. That, and he used a big scary looking weapon to fire one shot in a perfectly safe and legal fashion. I guess you wanted him to use a flintlock?
I hope instead you'll be going over your third grade language arts primer on the proper use of apostrophes. Stay with it!
I have great respect for those that stormed the beaches of Normandy. Thanks for your service.
Even worse is how they drove their eight-cylinder gas guzzlers around the reservation and burned coal in their tomahawk assembly plants. Damned Indians! Damned liberals!
@pooponduke: Why are you always sharing these dumb, irrelevant tweets posted by equally dumb and irrelevant morons on our sacred message board?
I'm disappointed. After that whiny little bastard's bitch session, I fully expected him to put the barrel of his assault weapon in his mouth and pull the trigger. Damn!
Notice how all the family members share the same dumb expression on their faces. There's definitely some inbreeding going on in that gene pool, but what do you expect? They're from Nebraska!
Gun culture is part of the reason this kid took his AR-15 and wasted some folks.
A pissed off 14 yr old (undeveloped pre-frontal cortex) with an AR-15 is NOT a well-regulated militia
We wouldn't want an inbred as Veep, right?
If I'm a lot more like Trump than I am like you, I'm more than satisfied to be that way. Because you are a dolt and an asshole. In addition to the above, you said this...
You have previously made sure to include me in your weak-ass 'you people' taunt. So you must have been referring to me when you questioned who might not have served.. I'll tell you this, you whiny little bitch, if you question MY service again, I might have to pay your little fruit stand a visit. It won't be a pleasant one.
YOU started the service taunting, and now you whine like a little girl when you get the responses you asked for. You are too stupid to understand that my post was explaining your own words to you. YOU cluelessly asked for an explanation and I provided it, and now you think we should back away because your little feathers are ruffled by what you asked for. I don't think so. You want us to lay off, try having some common sense and a little decency.
It's beyond despicable when someone stands on their having served in the military as a higher ground against criticism. I respect your service and appreciate it, whatever it was. You as a person, not so much.
J.D. Vance's Appalachian roots notwithstanding, fortunately Tim Walz is from a different branch of his family tree.
Last edited:
