At least you didn't question his grammar from the "1700's" like Dumbass #1. The next time you talk to @nctransplant tell him it's 1700s, not 1700's. You would think with all that education required to earn his so-called master's degree he would by now know something he should have learned in the fifth grade.
Saved to the archives.
I'll tell you what is weak and that's insulting someone's grammar with a grammatically incorrect insult.
I'm pretty sure he needs to visit a men's restroom in Minnesota and change his tampon.
lol, and you call me a dumb SOB? His post was perfectly fine just as it was, and as I pointed out. You erroneously inferred what wasn't intended, and it wasn't because of how it was presented I didn't have any trouble understanding and I didn't need anything to be worded any differently to do so.
@pooponduke's comment about Germany attacking England -- "For example, had Hitler honored the peace agreement and not attacked England" -- is too vague to know precisely what he meant. So who are you to "point out" what he was trying to say?
I'm on this site way too often, and every time i'm here i see you posting about tampons. It is clearly more than a monthly thing for you, so what happened with tampons and minnesota and walz?
Walz had the tampon machines placed in male bathrooms in the schools. Completely normal, right?
The left one is much more entertaining.if you could only post one when that happens, which one would you choose?
Why does that bother you so much? I couldn't care less if they are placed there or not, no skin off my ass one way or the other.
Because you're telling kids that it's normal behavior. It's a mental disorder.
Absolutely. I'm a single issue voter, and that singular issue is seeing as much of that as possible.
"Mostly false" shocker.
www.snopes.com
you don't have to know precisely what he meant. You just don't infer what isn't intended, and what is not intended is clearly not stated.
I wouldn't know, because I don't have a crystal ball that tells a history that never happened. And if your reading comprehension and common sense was any better than @prlyles', you'd know that your question is misplaced and irrelevant. AS IT ACTUALLY HAPPENED, and germane to @pooponduke's point, Hitler attacked Poland and that is DIRECTLY why Britain declared war and DIRECTLY why Germany then attacked Britain. Your suppositions here are just your usual try-too-hard inanity.
Apparently they aren't. The bill was incredibly vague, making schools put them in the girls room, then making individual schools make a decision on how to ensure they're available to gender-neutral kids (aka girls wanting to be boys) a) if these transexuals even existed and b) if the transexuals that actually existed ask for them. But i'm with you, who cares unless the worry is about the funding.
I'll give you points for attempted humor I suppose, but what's it say about you that the word is Transplant and you saw Trans?
People draw conclusions all the time without knowing what is or isn't intended. For all we know, poopondook could have been implying there was a non-aggression pact for all of Europe. It's difficult to tell since his statement was unclear.
I like how you glossed right over the actual concern here, that being of the encouragement of having and using mixed-gender restrooms. I also like how you refer to tampon dispensers being furnished for the benefit of transsexuals who might not even exist. Always a good idea to put tampon machines out in case that should ever happen, I guess.
There were no dispensers if the trannies don't exist. There aren't that many trannies in the world, so most schools didn't have to do anything different other than put the dispensers in girls rooms.
don't make yourself look even dumber than before. Pointing out all your idiocy has become a daunting task.
lol, classic blazers. From YOUR Snopes link...
I find it amusing when you respond like this. Again and again you accuse me of trying too hard, but that's merely projection on your part. If anyone works up a sweat trying to make their point it's you. Take this discussion as an example -- you're arguing upside down and sideways to explain away someone else's comment. I wonder why that someone hasn't interjected to agree with you. Maybe because you are dead wrong?
typical. Take verbiage out of context to suggest what wasn't exactly intended, and then rely on no one actually watching the video.
Wait a minute, don't tell me NCtrans told a lie."Mostly false" shocker.
Shame on free lunch too, right?
Tim Walz Signed Bill Requiring Tampons in Boys' Bathrooms?
Snopes looked into the story behind the Minnesota governor's "Tampon Tim" nickname.
You're a real piece of work blueball. I've never seen anybody post so much without saying a damn thing that makes sense. I'm sure you impress the MAGAs like gunslinger and nctrans but you come off sounding like a damn fool to everybody else.
@pooponduke agreed, and he's the OP on this. Who would I rather have in agreement, pooponduke or you or prlyles? Duh.
Again, where does the bill regarding dispensers say anything regarding mixed-gender bathrooms. It doesn't even say anything about boy's bathrooms. Snopes list a theory, then people argue against that theory, and more importantly that theory is purely hypothetical, since actual schools didn't put any into boys bathrooms based on 15 districts that were interviewed.
and there you go, embarrassingly and pathetically relying on your usual need to take words out of context to try to save face. Next, you'll be whimpering, as usual, because I pointed out what a weak-assed liar you are.
