Oh I thought the country was headed in the wrong direction because Trump was running. That's what your queen said anyway.
Maybe you didn't realize 9 Dems voted against that horrible bill. It would have still allowed 1.8M illegals into the country. TDS has a permanent place in your head. Are you planning to leave the US once Orangeman takes the WH again?
Let us know when you grow up, have a family of your own, and get a big boy job. Mommy and Daddy can't pay your bills forever.
Libs have to stop being afraid to answer questions like this.
Different reasons and different issues.
Let the free market determine when that happens. We don't have the infrastructure to go all in right now. How would green vehicles and homes gotten along during the last two storms? It wasn't electric vehicles and equipment clearing roads and debris.
Agreed. Which is the entire point of KH's refusal/inability to actually answer questions when she is asked. She avoided answering this question, but that was obvious and in turn actually provides the answer to anyone except peewee.
Again. Agreed. It would also explain why it may have happened under the Trump Admin, not that he is in favor of or supports it. Because (to use one of KH's new favorite stock answers), they followed the law. Of course, that doesn't address the issue of what the law or policy should be which is the actual question. The bigger issue though is your crafty use of "top notch medical care" and the argument that such a term includes physical, cosmetic sex organ changes. I would say that "top notch" is not required versus "adequate". It's prison. However, there is still a large debate as to whether one can actually change their sex regardless of what they physically do to their appearances. It's prison. There is simply no need to "treat" or pay for this while in the care and custody of the government anymore than the need to give them a Ruth's Chris steak every other Friday. I could care less what an adult wants to do with or to themselves on their own freewill and at their own expense, but there is no good argument that everyone else has to pay for it.
You are not wrong here in terms of the general premise that we should be focusing on the bigger issues. The problem is that we don't get to have things both ways. For example, you don't get to say that we shouldn't discuss the incredibly small issue of funding surgeries for a 1000 people across the country while talking out the other side of your mouth and insisting that another 1000 people is a large enough problem that we insist that it's just dandy for them to play in women's sports or give presentations in government sponsored institutions to kids. Is it an issue or isn't it? Any given issue is either too small to merit a discussion and not be discussed on everything or, they are big enough to address and discuss on everything. Trying to have it both ways is the problem. But this highlights part of the problem with the D party's sprint to the far left where they cater and bow to so many groups regardless of the actual size of the issue and its true impact on the rest of the country.
Why? I get the idea that you detest the notion of fossil fuels and the internal combustion engine on a base level, but beyond the fantastical notion that we can change this way of life by ourselves without the rest of the world coming along, how do you think this is even remotely possible to achieve without completely eliminating our country as we know it? This is so impractical from a real world perspective. We don't live on a classroom blackboard. We don't even have a grid that could support this.
The word "green" is a great thing to throw around, but unless you are advocating an incredible expansion of nuclear energy, what on earth are you talking about? The technology is just not there yet to create or store energy at the levels needed. And you think the cost of energy has been bad recently? You ain't seen nothing yet.
1. The free market has been almost completely in charge all along and has done a horrible job on climate change. I may be a lefty but I'm perfectly happy to let the free market handle a lot of things. This one is too important and the free market has already failed very badly.
You might want to discuss your thoughts with the farmers in the US. And while you're at it are you going to get the 2 largest contributors of emissions, India and China, to play along as well? I don't think so.
Just wanted to bump this for the libs in the back.In case you don't believe Fox News
FBI quietly changed violent crime data to show increase, not decrease, from 2021 to 2022
Violent crime data has been a top talking point for Democrats looking to credit the Biden-Harris administration.cbsaustin.com
Thanks for answering the question, something our esteemed cultist was unable to do. I agree with most of your answer here. I believe we should be providing proper medical care for those legally in our jurisdiction. If you're not legally in the United States, you shouldn't be entitled to receiving that care. It seems the real debate is whether gender transition surgeries should be tax payer funded for anyone. I'd argue no, and I haven't heard a convincing argument as to why we should.
Happy to. No - this issue absolutely isn't important enough to be a focus in political discussions, especially for a presidential election. I don't think it would be in the discussion at all if the Left didn't try to paint the Right as an "eXiStEnTiAl ThReAt" to the LGBT population. I agree with you that I also just don't care about debating "trans rights" as a major focus issue in politics.
Wow. We almost had a good conversation started. You raised some questions, and I responded.
Where I differ is that I favor giving care to those who need care, based on need, not status. If they don't belong here, you can ship them out after they've received the care. They're people, regardless of their legal status.
lol, the dark side has done a lot of that, comparing their glaring lunacy and bumbling to insignificant things that Trump has done. You know, like Trump has dementia because he stumbled over a word.
This is pretty special. Did the editors at 60 Minutes edit these clips for them?
LMAO. This was pathetic. Be happy with having convinced us of you supporting Cackling Kamala so desperately that you posted this, because that's all it has convinced anyone of. As a matter of fact, the desperation you display in this lame attempt to vindicate has the opposite effect.
The head shift... perfect.
apnews.com
Lol at George Conway, he's a member of the same diet club Michael Moore belongs to.
“Mitch McConnell said after the 2020 election that then-President Donald Trump was ‘stupid as well as being ill-tempered,’ a ‘despicable human being’ and a ‘narcissist,’ according to excerpts from a new biography of the Senate Republican leader that will be released this month.”
McConnell called Trump 'stupid' and 'despicable' in private after the 2020 election, a new book says
Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said after the 2020 election that then-President Donald Trump was “stupid as well as being ill-tempered” and a “despicable human being."
