The thing that I find funny about this assertion by Blaze is sitting back and playing the role of the Kingmaker within the party is what I was begging for orange to do two years ago instead of running again. You can't be both and had he joined behind someone else, I don't think this thing would be particularly close right now. The same thing if the Biden/Harris team had not run again and someone else had been nominated and voted on, Trump would be down bigly.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Thanks for this.
Fair enough, but that means the standard is only a scintilla over the other person and is always relative. How low do you descend into the pig slop before it doesn't really matter anymore? If one candidate's body count is 5000 and the other is 5010, the former is not the "whore" because they boinked a mere 10 less? What if the latter was all consenting adults at Diddy and Epstein parties and the former paid high priced escorts everyday? All I'm saying is that neither one of these people are total paragons of virtue and I think you are kidding yourself if you think what we think we know about them gives one or the other a significant bump on the morality table. It still gets back to the policy that they will institute with the power of that office.
I get it, you're a dog guy. You're not alone.
This is the part that most people find to be an inconvenience. They love the Constitution when it supports their narrative. It's annoying and needs to be "re-interpreted" for "modern times" when it doesn't.
I agree with this completely, and I was hoping the same thing, that he wouldn't run again but that his presence and influence would lend the supports he gets to the chosen candidate. Shoo-in against Biden/Harris, high probability against others.
While I'm willing to give her the benefit of the doubt (who brags about working at McDonald's while in college?), I'm sure I'm not as obsessed about it as you are. And she doesn't need to prop up her middle-class upbringing, especially when she's going head-to-head with Donald Trump.
As for "switching the letters," never mind the letters. You're a bigger moron than I thought if you think Trump doesn't lie, exaggerate, distort the truth, and fudge the numbers to prop up his actual worth.
Why are we still talking about this? Let it go, pooptard. Let it go.
this is the guy who tried to ridicule me for simply repeating that there were upwards of 20 grand illegals around Springfield Ohio, with him claiming that there were only something like 5,000. He made a big deal of discrediting what he considered to be partisan exaggeration on my part. Turns out the twenty grand was exactly right, and I pointed that out to him and provided credible substantiation..
He has yet to admit hat he made himself look like a fool in that case. He's just a stooge, not to be taken seriously.
I'm not obsessed with anything other than your false claim that something was inconsistent. You asked the question of "which is it" on a false premise (something you do quite often with one of your "sounds like" statements) and I called you on your: 1) idiocy or: 2) intentional misstatement. As to who falsely brags about it, the answer would be (per McD's own stats), someone who is trying to appeal to the 1 in 8 that have worked there as well as all those people around them that worked at other, similar jobs.
Trump would never claim such a stance because he is not trying to distance himself from his upbringing. Further, if you go back to your beloved polls, that's where orange has hit her the hardest in collecting his support with the middle class type worker from McD's. You need to dig a little deeper on the demographics that have taken place.
You're the moron if you think that the letter doesn't matter because the treatment is fair and unbiased. But nice move of the goalposts/whataboutism.
Says the guy who responds every freaking time. Look in the mirror, if you can stand the view.
Well, he's certainly proficient at posting campaign approved talking points and changing topics when handed the receipts of deceit.
He will have a mental breakdown after election day. We will never see him again.
lol, welcome to dealing with that slipperiest of slippery eels, @Heels Noir. Corner him and you'll find he has no reluctance at all to prevaricate. If you call him on it, just wait a day or two after this exchange is pages back, and he'll pop up and say YOU were lying.
Of course I know what a "poll" is and I knew it didn't meet the technical definition when I posted it. But it's worth more than you're posting to which it referred. Only one poll matters. That's why I made fun of you for ad nauseum posting polls when you were all high on joy and hope. Reality has returned and, now, not so many polls. I'll give you credit, at least you aren't arguing that the only polls are ones Trump is paying for to flood the market with them.
But it does get back to the incessant idea of polling about everything including how did she do in her interview? Was it favorable? Etc. All I know is the televised portion was 21 minutes and she referenced Trump 42 times in that span of time. I'm gonna go out on a limb and guess it wasn't ever in a favorable manner. Thus, she spent the bulk of her time telling us about how bad her opponent is. Fair enough, but it's not like she gave us any info about what her plans in so doing. That leaves us with vote against trump and abortion. Is this really how to run a railroad?
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ This is a very good result.
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇This is a very bad result.
and this is the perfect opportunity to explain why I think your stance is so misguided. I don't care what anyone thinks about Trump personally. I don't care about him personally at all myself. I only care about what his presidency would be like compared to the competition.
So let's agree, neither are saints. The huge difference is that while Trump exaggerates like johnny-be-good (and if you want to say he lies, for the sake of argument I wont argue), The lies he gets raked over the coals for are apparent and harmless if you have an IQ that even just registers. Harris just flat out lies and deceives and it's so fvcking obvious that she is doing so that I almost choke when no one points it out.
You get exactly what you see with Donald Trump, and that is precisely why he gets the support he gets. Many of us are just beyond fed up with the Kamala Harris', i.e. politicians who practice deception as if it's in the job description. Trump bullshits but he is not a phony. I hate phonies and I don't trust a phony. Kamala Harris is phony to the core.
LOL Junior, look at the dates posted on the garbage you posted. This garbage isn't helping your cause.
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️ This is a very good result.
⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇️⬇This is a very bad result.
At least you're admitting that you'll post irrelevant and fictitious crap here just because you feel like it. (Sorry but I can't comment on the rest of your post because I stopped reading after the first sentence.)
Last edited:
Dude, learn how the world you live in works so you don't sound so dumb all of the time.
There's that reading issue again, because I said nothing remotely close to your summary.
Again, help is out there, but you must be willing to seek it out. I think @chickenhunter has particular expertise with special ed and could probably make some referrals if needed.
Funny that you think facts have a bias. Lol.
FactCheck.org Bias and Reliability | Ad Fontes Media
Following are bias and reliability scores for FactCheck.org according to Ad Fontes Media. Bias: Middle; Reliability: Reliable, Analysis ...
Who cares about Kamala's McD work experience?
Trump supporters care.
Who cares about Trump refusing to return classified documents?
Everybody should but Rs are too busy caring about Kamala flipping burgers.
Do you realize it's illegal for non-citizens to enter the country outside of a port of entry? Ya, doesn't seem to stop them either.
Must be her stance on banning fracking that's endearing her to so many in PA?
Given all the diddling that went on in Happy Valley I would have considered it a Progressive stronghold.
You could of saved a lot of keystrokes by typing, "I'm a cuck in a cult".
He doesn't want to get accused of copying you when you put that in your signature line.
"62% consider the national economy in bad shape"More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
Funny that you think those things are actual facts that support a narrative.Funny that you think facts have a bias. Lol.
FactCheck.org Bias and Reliability | Ad Fontes Media
Following are bias and reliability scores for FactCheck.org according to Ad Fontes Media. Bias: Middle; Reliability: Reliable, Analysis ...adfontesmedia.com
I appreciate that you are using Allsides to check on sources.
Here's another rating group's take on FactCheck.
FactCheck.org
LEAST BIASED
FactCheck.org - Bias and Credibility
LEAST BIASED These sources have minimal bias and use very few loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using an appeal to emotion
mediabiasfactcheck.com
What? You just admitted you wrote something that you knew was inaccurate. Maybe you don't know the difference between a poll and someone sharing a biased untruth after all.
He's saved the date on that, November 6, 2024. He registered at Tyndal Funeral Home.
You're like trying to calculate pi where one just gets caught in an infinity loop. After about the 20th digit, I'm done dealing with your need to respond.
Nah. It'll take them days/weeks to "count" the votes. This silliness of planning to count them on election night just because we know the date and everything is so antiquated. Better move the date a week or two.
Similar threads
