Settle down, errbody got some paper towels
Settle down, errbody got some paper towels
That's Deplorables to you, you little furry.In 2016, the pollsters definitely underrepresented the gullible redneck, mentally retarded, trailer-trash part of the electorate. That has since been corrected with the non-partisan pollsters.
So which is it, pooptard, does McDonald’s have "no record of Kamala Harris ever working for the company" or are they proud to hear she has "fond memories of working under the Arches"?You'd think with the left's/media meltdown over Trump's McD photo op, they would have had a meltdown over this, oh wait. . .
It's being reported the Harris Campaign is pretty upset about the Trump McDonald's bit. They say at some time this week she will do either Five Guys or In n Out...
Another demonstration of Noir's difficulty and sad, sad ability with reading comprehension. Or, have we actually been giving you too much credit and it's just a comprehension problem?So which is it, pooptard, does McDonald’s have "no record of Kamala Harris ever working for the company" or are they proud to hear she has "fond memories of working under the Arches"?
Another pointless tweet -- Over 1 million served.
Doesn't really matter in terms of Pres unless it is specific to the 7 swing states.More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
But what about fast food photo op?It's being reported the Harris Campaign is pretty upset about the Trump McDonald's bit. They say at some time this week she will do either Five Guys or In n Out...
More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
I heard she has extra cheese.But what about fast food photo op?
More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
This is interesting.My top 1000 factors in deciding who to vote for
Does this mean that the last time you voted for President was in 1980? I mean, that's the last time a candidate had an arguably above average character (and he was not a good president regardless of the person he has proven to be). One could very reasonably argue that anyone who gets one of the two party nominations has a character issue or they would not be in that position. It certainly applies to this election. More importantly, why do you see this as the number one issue for this office? We aren't talking about someone to serve on the church board of directors here.1: character
Based on your running commentary about the issues, you may have included too many numbers here. Eliminating the first two or the last two would be far more accurate.2. Economy
3. Constitution
481. Party affiliation
Please clarify. Is that your neighbors' actual cat, or, is it someone in your neighbor's household who identifies as a cat?749. My neighbors cats opinion
That's as it should be. So you would be against all the anti-Semitism that has sprung up lately? More importantly, would you agree that it shouldn't be a factor and on anyone's list because it was already handled by number 3?822. Ouija board recommendation
Did not make the list:
Your post
Religion
There he is: POLL BOY to the rescue. You used to do this about every two hours or so. Now, it's dropped to a frequency of about every two weeks. Did something change? Hmmmm.More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
Aside from what Harris has on her résumé or McDonald's statement about it, the crux of my post more than anything else was about @amuse, the pointless idiot who tweeted the contradiction in the first place. Now you're posting this crap above which shows YOUR ineptitude in reading comprehension.One is a candidate making a claim that literally can't be confirmed by anyone else (the company, the franchise owner, co-workers, etc.) and the media leaving the claim alone because it would hurt their anointed queen. The other is a very general statement by that company that assumes the truth of that candidate's claim and comments accordingly. "So,. which is it"? Both, you dumb ass.
With an overall lead of 11 points, I suspect the shared opinion applies to the swing states to some degree.Doesn't really matter in terms of Pres unless it is specific to the 7 swing states.
I guess people are looking for something unfavorable then. Trump’s betting odds are about 59%; the highest they’ve been since Kamala entered the race. See you in a couple weeks, Pumpkin.
LOL at "normal people".Do you realize it's illegal for U.S. citizens to place bets on polymarket?
Do you realize that it took a foreign entity dropping $30 million to move the odds?
Do you know normal people are laughing at you for not understanding the topics you post?
Well we’re talking about making someone the most powerful person on the planet so to me it’s critical. I’m not looking for a saint. Just someone with some integrity or at least more than the other guy or galThis is interesting.
Does this mean that the last time you voted for President was in 1980? I mean, that's the last time a candidate had an arguably above average character (and he was not a good president regardless of the person he has proven to be). One could very reasonably argue that anyone who gets one of the two party nominations has a character issue or they would not be in that position. It certainly applies to this election. More importantly, why do you see this as the number one issue for this office? We aren't talking about someone to serve on the church board of directors here.
I put out two bowls of anti freeze. One blue one red. Then see which she drinksBased on your running commentary about the issues, you may have included too many numbers here. Eliminating the first two or the last two would be far more accurate.
Please clarify. Is that your neighbors' actual cat, or, is it someone in your neighbor's household who identifies as a cat?
Yes I would agreeThat's as it should be. So you would be against all the anti-Semitism that has sprung up lately? More importantly, would you agree that it shouldn't be a factor and on anyone's list because it was already handled by number 3?
With an overall lead of 11 points, I suspect the shared opinion applies to the swing states to some degree.
Do you know what a poll is because that's not a poll. Not even close. That's you throwing around random numbers you pulled out of your ass.How about this poll?
There it is!Polling in PA has 11% of republicans voting for Harris. Biden received 6% of the republican vote in 2020.
In the most recent statewide race,Shapiro won the state by 15 points. If Harris is anywhere close to 11%, Trump can't win PA. Unfortunately the middle of that state is basically Alabama with a lot of racist hillbillies which will keep it closer than one would think.
There it is!
There it is.... an accurate description of Happy Valley and surrounding counties.
Misdemeanor?I feel like these types of things being plastered across the nation could help tamp down fvckery. But also people screwing with elections need more severe penalties.
People - including luminaries like David Brooks - are already blaming the selection of Walz for the loss of PA.Democrats see weakest voter registration edge in decades
Despite some gains, registered Democrats are losing ground to Republicans in Pennsylvania as the 2024 election approaches.www.spotlightpa.org
UH-OH
Thanks for the link. I found this chart particularly interesting.More Americans have a favorable view of Harris than Trump
Percent of registered voters
. . . . . . . . . Favorable . . Unfavorable
Harris . . . . 51 . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Walz . . . . . .41 . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Trump . . . .40 . . . . . . . . . . .58
Vance . . . . 33 . . . . . . . . . . .48
Registered voters are split on trusting Harris or Trump to handle economic issues - AP-NORC
Although 62% consider the national economy in bad shape, there has been an improvement in the public's view of the economy since last year.apnorc.org
Do you realize it's illegal for U.S. citizens to place bets on polymarket?
Do you realize that it took a foreign entity dropping $30 million to move the odds?
Do you realize normal people are laughing at you for not understanding the topics you post?
Sure thing, Sport. See you in a couple weeks.
⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️⬆️
A person who understands he's been made to look like a fool, without admitting that he's been made to look like a fool.
I don't remember seeing 'Kingmaker' on any ballot. Guess I need to pay better attention.He was running for "Kingmaker" and fudged it up, like everything else he touches.
this 'non-partisan pollster' idea...is that a real thing? You seem to be indicating that some pollsters are NOT non-partisan. Hmmm, that would explain a lot. You take from that what you will, and I'll take from it what it really is.In 2016, the pollsters definitely underrepresented the gullible redneck, mentally retarded, trailer-trash part of the electorate. That has since been corrected with the non-partisan pollsters.
And you double down. There is NO contradiction.Aside from what Harris has on her résumé or McDonald's statement about it, the crux of my post more than anything else was about @amuse, the pointless idiot who tweeted the contradiction in the first place. Now you're posting this crap above which shows YOUR ineptitude in reading comprehension.