Everything I posted is a fact in that list is a fact. I do wonder what is so cognitively wrong with you that you are able to so easily disregard facts.weak, weak sauce. Just one unsubstantiated and unsubstantiatable claim after another, some of them nothing more than slander.
FIFY. Plenty of republicans are voting for Harris.MAGA support:
And they're all going to vote for him
Bill barr says he's voting for him, but many are not.And they're all going to vote for him
Makes no sense to me.Bill barr says he's voting for him, but many are not.
I wonder what cognitive impairment you suffer that keeps you from understanding what a fact is. I know what cognitive impairment caused you to offer this nonsense though. Plain old liberalism with complications of TDS.Everything I posted is a fact in that list is a fact. I do wonder what is so cognitively wrong with you that you are able to so easily disregard facts.
More often than not it would be an unstable single parent situation who would have neglected said child who would have grown up to be a burden on society (criminal, needing public assistance, etc.) that would be getting an abortion. They're willingly nipping that problem in the bud for the rest of us. We shouldn't discourage that, we should send them a thank you card.
he needs empathy alright, and you could use a few more IQ points if you are trying to make this seem to be the fault of an election campaign or 'republicans', as if they broke into his home and held him at gunpoint. The empathy he needed should have come from his family which allowed his dementia to go out of bounds.
You're the one who supports all this evil because your cult leader tells you to.
You're the only one in danger of jumping, or drinking the flavor aid, if your cult leader tells you to.
MAGA support:
FIFY. Plenty of republicans are voting for Harris.
yes, all we need is four years of Kamala and all our wildest dreams will come true. My wildest dream is clearing out our debt. I wonder what it will be down to after four years of Kamala. I bet it will be down to orders of magnitude higher than it is now. That takes care of that. Next problem that Kamala will solve by denying Trump the presidency....This expresses my feelings perfectly
I think what is baffling for many of us (not a dem but I’m a never Trumper) is that Trump isn’t just “bad”. He is awful. Like historically one of the worst public GOP figures in our nation’s history. And I’m not just talking about his moral failings. His go to economic policy is tariffs, he flirts with dictators, he won’t solve the deficit, etc. He is awful.
Kamala, on the other hand is a run of the mill progressive democrat. She is not a Marxist. She is not a socialist. She is a bland run of the mill candidate. She is unlikely to be a great president, but c’mon, she is orders of magnitude better than the piece of shit has been that is Trump.
For me, I just want MAGA gone from our politics. I want an actual fiscal conservative candidate from the GOP, I want balanced budgets. The only way to get that is to break MAGA’s chokehold on the GOP and the only way to get that is 4 years of Kamala. That is the only pragmatic choice.
Here's a fun read on how the polling averages are being manipulated.
![]()
“Red Wave” Redux: Are GOP Polls Rigging the Averages in Trump’s Favor?
Polling by right-leaning firms has exploded this cycle. Maybe they want to be accurate—or maybe they’re trying to create a sense of momentum for Donald Trump.newrepublic.com
Betting markets are a poor place to try to determine outcome. Odds can change based on betting patterns. If many people bet on one outcome, the bookmaker might adjust the odds to balance their riskFIFY. Plenty of republicans are voting for Harris.
Harris has a ton of small-donor support, grassroots support, and how REPUBLICAN support. She might lose small, might win small, but she also might win BIG. Trump definitely won't big despite what betting markets or what low quality polls (marketing grift) are spewing recently.
FIFY. Plenty of republicans are voting for Harris.
Harris has a ton of small-donor support, grassroots support, and how REPUBLICAN support. She might lose small, might win small, but she also might win BIG. Trump definitely won't big despite what betting markets or what low quality polls (marketing grift) are spewing recently.
Betting markets are a poor place to try to determine outcome. Odds can change based on betting patterns. If many people bet on one outcome, the bookmaker might adjust the odds to balance their risk
Bet you've never exceeded the speed limit either. Of course, some here would point out to me that doing so can be a challenge to those on a bike that are physically out of shape.Not to mention it is illegal for U.S. citizens to place bets on polymarkets' elections. It's literally, all foreign money.
Bet you've never exceeded the speed limit either. Of course, some here would point out to me that doing so can be a challenge to those on a bike that are physically out of shape.
So your "argument" is there some really dumb people …
This is so sad on so many levels. The biggest is that millions of people like yourself are so infected with TDS that you'd blame such a situation on Trump and spread such falsehoods claiming the Trump campaign made this poor guy lose his life savings.
Who's arguing?So your "argument" is there some really dumb people who are willing to illegally place bets and that's why you think there's some legitimate insights on the election via polymarkets?
![]()
That's interesting.![]()
NC Republicans Unanimously Shoot Down Democratic Bill to Help WNC’s Helene Victims Vote - NC Voices
North Carolina's Republican legislators refused to make any changes to help those impacted by Hurricane Helene vote, shooting down a bill proposed by Democrats that would have given those impacted more time to register and send ballots in.ncvoices.com
Grifting the elderly - that's swell.
Who's arguing?
I simply pointed out that you're a dumbass and a hypocrite because you keep stating that it's illegal to bet on the election. People, including yourself, do things all the time that are technically illegal. It doesn't mean it's not happening.
And shitty, skewed polls could help gin up some support for his claims of "rigged election".Here's trump whole plan to win.
He currently has 196 active voting and election cases pending in 40 states. Number of cases by state.
Georgia 23
Pennsylvania 16
North Carolina 15
Wisconsin 14
Arizona 14
He knows, that he needs to disqualify large swaths of votes so his cult followers can assault police and democracy.
"Theoretically, this should game the averages as well. Something like this happened in 2022: As Nate Cohn wrote for the Times on the eve of that election, the averages were being bombarded by “a wave of polls” from firms that didn’t “adhere to industry standards for transparency or data collection” and which were producing “much more Republican-friendly results.” Democrats ended up defying the results suggested by some of the averages, picking up a Senate seat and holding House losses to a minimum—itself a historically anomalous result for a party holding the White House in a midterm election—even as many predicted a GOP rout."
Except there was no grift. Not a scintilla of evidence that they did anything other than send messages and requests to which the guy willingly said Yes. There is nothing to suggest that WinRed did anything nefarious or had any information that they were dealing with someone who had such issues.Grifting the elderly - that's swell.
Agree completely. It's part of the reason I called a poster here Poll Boy because they really mean nothing. And it's only worse when Orangeman is involved. They have a terrible time accounting for him and the false polling.![]()
Polls are kinda worthless in a tight race. Even high-level pollsters try to explain the worth of their poll and their answer is full of caveats and qualifiers.
Agreed, as it was obvious to everyone else. You were the one who needed to think about your posts.
Rather astounding, isn't it? Especially in a state where the race is so close that both candidates need as much help as they can get. I knew some of our leaders in Raleigh were shortsighted, but this decision is confounding.If i read that correctly the group of people are majority repub. You'd think they'd want to make it easier for the repubs to vote. Maybe disenfranchisement is their MO, but that is shooting themselves in the foot.
I saw this "headline" and wondered about this vote. I figured someone here would fill us in on the rest of the story because I really find it hard to believe that R's are unanimously against helping the people of western NC. Rather, it's probably a horrible bill with all kinds of other stuff snuck into it. You know, like calling something a Border Bill that contains mostly foreign war funding or calling something an Inflation Reduction Act that is really a climate bill (per our president's own words). So, what's the real story behind this headline?That's interesting.
"Just under 17% of North Carolina’s registered voters live in areas impacted by Helene, totaling more than 1.277 million people in 25 counties, according to the state board of elections. Unaffiliated voters make up the greatest percentage of registered voters with 491,098, followed by registered Republicans at 480,916. There are 293,397 registered Democrats in those counties."
If i read that correctly the group of people are majority repub. You'd think they'd want to make it easier for the repubs to vote. Maybe disenfranchisement is their MO, but that is shooting themselves in the foot.
Nope, none of that, but it's not at all surprising you would go there.Rather, it's probably a horrible bill with all kinds of other stuff snuck into it.
I saw this "headline" and wondered about this vote. I figured someone here would fill us in on the rest of the story because I really find it hard to believe that R's are unanimously against helping the people of western NC. Rather, it's probably a horrible bill with all kinds of other stuff snuck into it. You know, like calling something a Border Bill that contains mostly foreign war funding or calling something an Inflation Reduction Act that is really a climate bill (per our president's own words). So, what's the real story behind this headline?