ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

iLlegaLS CAnt vOTe.

You’re doing this wrong. It’s the second time recently where you've used it incorrectly. I was gonna let the first one slide but if you insist on being an idiot, I feel obligated to correct you.

The correct usage is to write something that the opposition is known for saying. So instead of saying “illegals can’t vote” in that style, it would have been more appropriate for you to have written “IlLeGaLs ArE vOtInG!”. See, by writing it in that style, you’re mocking the opposition. So saying your side’s argument in its usage makes no sense. Also, you’ll see I used an exclamation mark. That denotes heightened emotion, which is a trademark of the left. You know how you guys get all mad and shit and have veins popping out? That’s to convey that sentiment. But that doesn’t really work when you’re attacking the more logical side of any argument. So forget that. Never mind to the whole exclamation mark thing. But the rest is applicable.

I hope this helps because you people are so bad at the roasting, memes, and such (along with the policy and governing). I’m just trying to help you not look like a moron. And it’s quite a task so you’ll have to put in a little effort if we’re gonna get you there.
 
You’re doing this wrong. It’s the second time recently where you've used it incorrectly. I was gonna let the first one slide but if you insist on being an idiot, I feel obligated to correct you.

The correct usage is to write something that the opposition is known for saying. So instead of saying “illegals can’t vote” in that style, it would have been more appropriate for you to have written “IlLeGaLs ArE vOtInG!”. See, by writing it in that style, you’re mocking the opposition. So saying your side’s argument in its usage makes no sense. Also, you’ll see I used an exclamation mark. That denotes heightened emotion, which is a trademark of the left. You know how you guys get all mad and shit and have veins popping out? That’s to convey that sentiment. But that doesn’t really work when you’re attacking the more logical side of any argument. So forget that. Never mind to the whole exclamation mark thing. But the rest is applicable.

I hope this helps because you people are so bad at the roasting, memes, and such (along with the policy and governing). I’m just trying to help you not look like a moron. And it’s quite a task so you’ll have to put in a little effort if we’re gonna get you there.
Kamala Harris Goodbye GIF by The Democrats
 
  • Haha
Reactions: bluetoe
wait, it's tough for you to acknowledge that Bolton is right and smarter than most republicans in power? Well then you can relax, because he isn't. As I was indicating, his trying to put the blame for Biden's withdrawal catastrophe on Trump removed any credibility he might have had. For those who need help recognizing the obvious, he is not out to do trump any favors.
See, you just proved my point. Bolton (of all people) is one of the few Rs who sees right through Trump.

You don't like it because it reaffirms how awful Trump is.

I don't like it because it makes Bolton look almost reasonable. Which isn't usually anything I want to admit about the arch neocon.
 
I'm not defending anyone. I'm just pointing out that Trump is nowhere close to free of responsibility. John Bolton, Lieutenant General H.R. McMaster, the National Security Council, among others agree. In fact, the NSC lays most of the blame on Trump.

A U.S. review led by the National Security Council of the chaotic 2021 withdrawal of U.S. troops from Afghanistan largely lays the blame on former President Donald Trump, saying President Joe Biden was “severely constrained” by the decisions of his predecessor.


But go ahead and argue otherwise, you stupid f*ck. Maybe someone should take you out and shoot you in the back of the head, you f*cking moron.
oh hell, really? Why didn't you say so to begin with? That's what the national security council says? And that report sums it up as being Trump's fault? Well, let's lend as much credibility to this as we can, because I know you'd never try to slip some bullshit by us.

OK, let's see this national security council....https://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/

Ok, wait, what? White House? They must have a backdoor of some kind to the national security council. Let's see..."The National Security Council is the President’s principal forum for national security and foreign policy decision making with his or her senior national security advisors and cabinet officials, and the President’s principal arm for coordinating these policies across federal agencies."

"The NSC is chaired by the President. Its regular attendees are the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations, the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Chief of Staff to the President, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. "


LMAO. Jesus you're such a fvcking joke. That so-called 'report' is nothing more than an attempted White House-generated whitewash of Biden's bungled handling of the Afghan withdrawal. The report itself doesn't even have an official heading. I think this isn't the only time you tried to pass off some WH blather as being some neutral third party absolution of Biden for his incompetency, hoping that no one would actually look into it.

My favorite part of this is you claiming that you aren't defending Biden, like you're just a seeker of the truth. You're nothing but a lib apologist and a Biden crotch remora. LMAO again.

"Maybe someone should take you out and shoot you in the back of the head, you f*cking moron."

lol, If I was forced to read your stupidity much more than I do, it would be a blessing.
 
See, you just proved my point. Bolton (of all people) is one of the few Rs who sees right through Trump.

You don't like it because it reaffirms how awful Trump is.

I don't like it because it makes Bolton look almost reasonable. Which isn't usually anything I want to admit about the arch neocon.
you say it makes Bolton seem reasonable just because he doesn't like Trump and dumps on him. I don't like it because it reaffirms nothing, and that being because he is not credible, just as I said. And just as I said, he is not credible in this instance because he tries to lay the blame for the Afghan fiasco completely on Trump, and he does so lamely.

Try again, but try to do better next time. This was weak.
 
you say it makes Bolton seem reasonable just because he doesn't like Trump and dumps on him.
Well, that helps. ;) But it's also because he seems to be making a sober assessment against Bolton's own interests (as a staunch Republican who would ordinarily support his party's nominee).

Does that mean he's right in his condemnation of Trump? Maybe not, by his lonesome. But he joins a growing chorus of well-placed Rs and experts. That deserves our attention, imo.
 
you say it makes Bolton seem reasonable just because he doesn't like Trump and dumps on him. I don't like it because it reaffirms nothing, and that being because he is not credible, just as I said. And just as I said, he is not credible in this instance because he tries to lay the blame for the Afghan fiasco completely on Trump, and he does so lamely.

Try again, but try to do better next time. This was weak.

Says the cult member...

If Bolton was some outlier, you might have a point. The problem is, Bolton is literally only 1 of hundreds in Trump’s administration that agree with Bolton. If you find your way out of your nonsensical cult of disinformation, you will look back and realize how unbelievably stupid you sound.
 
Last edited:
oh hell, really? Why didn't you say so to begin with? That's what the national security council says? And that report sums it up as being Trump's fault? Well, let's lend as much credibility to this as we can, because I know you'd never try to slip some bullshit by us.

OK, let's see this national security council....https://www.whitehouse.gov/nsc/

Ok, wait, what? White House? They must have a backdoor of some kind to the national security council. Let's see..."The National Security Council is the President’s principal forum for national security and foreign policy decision making with his or her senior national security advisors and cabinet officials, and the President’s principal arm for coordinating these policies across federal agencies."

"The NSC is chaired by the President. Its regular attendees are the Vice President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Secretary of Energy, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, the Representative of the United States of America to the United Nations, the Administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Chief of Staff to the President, and the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs. "


LMAO. Jesus you're such a fvcking joke. That so-called 'report' is nothing more than an attempted White House-generated whitewash of Biden's bungled handling of the Afghan withdrawal. The report itself doesn't even have an official heading. I think this isn't the only time you tried to pass off some WH blather as being some neutral third party absolution of Biden for his incompetency, hoping that no one would actually look into it.

My favorite part of this is you claiming that you aren't defending Biden, like you're just a seeker of the truth. You're nothing but a lib apologist and a Biden crotch remora. LMAO again.

"Maybe someone should take you out and shoot you in the back of the head, you f*cking moron."

lol, If I was forced to read your stupidity much more than I do, it would be a blessing.
dorothy-what-to-do-if-you-had-a-brain.png
 
Trump continues to display cognitive decline

lol dude, stop trying, you're just embarrassing yourself with the desperation you're displaying. He'd have to have a lobotomy to cognitively decline half as much as the walking corpse you're trying to resurrect by comparison. I doubt people are seeing this and scrambling to try to get their early vote ballots back.
 
Well, that helps. ;) But it's also because he seems to be making a sober assessment against Bolton's own interests (as a staunch Republican who would ordinarily support his party's nominee).

Does that mean he's right in his condemnation of Trump? Maybe not, by his lonesome. But he joins a growing chorus of well-placed Rs and experts. That deserves our attention, imo.
is this growing chorus something new to your experience? Where you been the last eight plus years?

I am not one to track polls or make predictions, I just wait to see what happens. But what I do know is that while many hopefuls like you focus on and point to the vocal condemnations, there is a great mass of voters who won't admit doing so who will vote for Trump.

We'll see how it all washes out.
 
Says the cult member...

If Bolton was some outlier, you might have a point. The problem is, Bolton is literally only 1 of hundreds in Trump’s administration that agree with Bolton. If you find your way out of your nonsensical cult of disinformation, you will look back and realize how unbelievably stupid you sound.
I hate to shatter your illusions, but how stupid I sound to you is of extremely little concern to me. And speaking of your stupidity, you aren't bright enough to understand that the more the people you mention try to undermine Trump, the more quiet support he gets from voters who are sick to death of the political character assassination that he has endured like a champion.

So stupid for you to hang on your idiotic 'cult' reference, as if I give a rat's ass what you think of cults or my belonging in one...given that you don't have enough self-awareness to see that you yourself are in the cult of TDS. You are a dullard.
 
I hate to shatter your illusions, but how stupid I sound to you is of extremely little concern to me. And speaking of your stupidity, you aren't bright enough to understand that the more the people you mention try to undermine Trump, the more quiet support he gets from voters who are sick to death of the political character assassination that he has endured like a champion.

So stupid for you to hang on your idiotic 'cult' reference, as if I give a rat's ass what you think of cults or my belonging in one...given that you don't have enough self-awareness to see that you yourself are in the cult of TDS. You are a dullard.

TDS only resides in his cult member's uneducated brains.
 
He knows he lost. He knew he lost when it happened. Never has stopped him from lying about it since then. And, it never stopped him from scheming as many potential cheats as possible before January 6th, and on January 6th.

He will NEVER get past the fact that crusty-old Joe Biden beat him badly. Even if he wins next week... he will NEVER get over that he lost in 2020. He's more distraught over that loss than probably anything else in his life.
 
Joe isn't very smart. His interviews are often entertaining because he will sit back and let crazy people rant nonsense. But even he realizes that Trump full of shit and completely delusional.
Rogan is smart. He's sort of a mash-up of intellectual... possibilities! He's not a very high IQ sorta smart. But, he's able to pick things apart and question them. He's had some really interesting guests during his podcast career.

I remember Penn Gillette on there talking about being on The Apprentice. It's been a while. Rogan, at that time, was disgusted by Donald Trump. But, Gillette IS smart. Gillette sshared some details about his experience with Trump on the show, and "off the show" and it just reveals how limited DJT really is, and also reveals some of the more distinct sociopath aspects that Trump possesses.
 
TDS only resides in his cult member's uneducated brains.
^^^^^displaying the symptom of projection typical of TDS victims. TDS obviously resides in the brains of those driven to ranting incessantly about Trump and denying their own TDS cult membership.

And speaking of 'uneducated'; if you want to see a lack of education, pay attention to his grammar in other posts. I question whether he has a HS diploma.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: strummingram
Rogan is smart. He's sort of a mash-up of intellectual... possibilities! He's not a very high IQ sorta smart. But, he's able to pick things apart and question them. He's had some really interesting guests during his podcast career.

I remember Penn Gillette on there talking about being on The Apprentice. It's been a while. Rogan, at that time, was disgusted by Donald Trump. But, Gillette IS smart. Gillette sshared some details about his experience with Trump on the show, and "off the show" and it just reveals how limited DJT really is, and also reveals some of the more distinct sociopath aspects that Trump possesses.
Gillette might be smart, but that doesn't mean his words are to be trusted. I decided they could not be trusted when some years ago he made a big deal of downplaying the danger to children posed by psychopathic pedophiles.

Gillette should probably stick to pulling rabbits out of Teller's ass.

People who have an axe to grind with Trump are of little interest to me at this point. There is some kind of psychological condition created when something or someone is widely demonized. People come out of the woodwork wanting to jump on the bandwagon and becoming the biggest bandwagoner of all, And jumping on this bandwagon means trashing Trump whether it's justified or not. Ho hum, humans exhibiting the darker side of human behavior.
 
Every Trump voter sat back and watched a violent mob try to overthrow American democracy based entirely on Trump's lies and thought to themselves "I fully support this and I will vote for this man again." This is just one reason why every current Trump voter is an irredeemable PoS

 
  • Haha
Reactions: gunslingerdick
^^^^^displaying the symptom of projection typical of TDS victims. TDS obviously resides in the brains of those driven to ranting incessantly about Trump and denying their own TDS cult membership.

And speaking of 'uneducated'; if you want to see a lack of education, pay attention to his grammar in other posts. I question whether he has a HS diploma.

 
Gillette might be smart, but that doesn't mean his words are to be trusted. I decided they could not be trusted when some years ago he made a big deal of downplaying the danger to children posed by psychopathic pedophiles.

Gillette should probably stick to pulling rabbits out of Teller's ass.

People who have an axe to grind with Trump are of little interest to me at this point. There is some kind of psychological condition created when something or someone is widely demonized. People come out of the woodwork wanting to jump on the bandwagon and becoming the biggest bandwagoner of all, And jumping on this bandwagon means trashing Trump whether it's justified or not. Ho hum, humans exhibiting the darker side of human behavior.
GDS is a bitch
 
This was last week;

“No transgender, no operations — you know, they take your kid — there are some places, your boy leaves for school, comes back a girl. Okay? Without parental consent.” He added, “At first, when I was told that was actually happening, I said, you know, it’s an exaggeration. No: it happens. It happens. There are areas where it happens.”

Then last night on rogan;

“Who would want to have — there’s so many — the transgender operations: where they’re allowed to take your child when he goes to school and turn him into a male — to a female — without parental consent.”

So is there anyone out there wanna tell me trump doesn’t actually believe this and is just exxagerating?
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT