ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

they’re both equally pathetic and you, i guess defended one?…what exactly did you say?…”no, he said inject disinfectant!!”

maybe you just like to argue for the man rather than just point out anyone injecting disinfectant or drinking clorox is an idiot.

wouldn’t it have been great if some did, though?…wonder if the death certificate would’ve said “died from covid”?

The other comment section claimed Trump said to drink Clorox. I asked for a clip and they claimed they couldn't find it.

Someone one here provided a clip that Trump said to "inject disinfectant". Those 2 things are not even close.

Inject disinfectant is what Trump was asking if it was possible.. then people act like that is the craziest thing to ask. Chemicals are injected everyday for people with various diseases.

So people took what Trump was asking and twisted it around to something totally different.. then act all innocent.
 
The other comment section claimed Trump said to drink Clorox. I asked for a clip and they claimed they couldn't find it.

Someone one here provided a clip that Trump said to "inject disinfectant". Those 2 things are not even close.

Inject disinfectant is what Trump was asking if it was possible.. then people act like that is the craziest thing to ask. Chemicals are injected everyday for people with various diseases.

So people took what Trump was asking and twisted it around to something totally different.. then act all innocent.
“then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it”

now i know where his source was that he was verifying with; a dept of homeland security official…lol so basically you or anyone else here.

look, you’re on his taint which is fine, i get it…but to defend his response to covid, you’re as pathetic and ignorant as state fans.
 
“then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it”

According to Strum, this was the quote;

"I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute," Trump said. "And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."
 
According to Strum, this was the quote;

"I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute," Trump said. "And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."

And he was correct about the quote. Skip to around :35

 
And he was correct about the quote. Skip to around :35


Either you on the left are a bunch of f-ing tards or just like to play ignorant.

gteeitup said this “then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it”

I was pointing out “then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it” was not said according to the quote by Strum.

All you clowns do is make up stuff.. then play dumb when faced with facts. It's a pattern among democrats.
 
Either you on the left are a bunch of f-ing tards or just like to play ignorant.

gteeitup said this “then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it”

I was pointing out “then i see a way we can use disinfectant, inject it” was not said according to the quote by Strum.

All you clowns do is make up stuff.. then play dumb when faced with facts. It's a pattern among democrats.

The f*ck are you on about?

I replied to you comment saying "According to strum, the quote was..."

I just shared the video showing said quote. I probably assumed you were in denial of the quote being real given the fact that it made the former POTUS sound like a complete dipshit. You'll have to forgive me for not being completely caught up on the context around here given the endless stream of garbage that gets posted on this thread.

And for the record, I've been a registered Independent since my 18th birthday. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass and learn how to interact with other human beings without constantly having to fall back on lazy, stupid generalizations. But if you're going to use them, at least make sure the person you're trying to argue with is a member of the group you're generalizing about. Otherwise you just look a 'f-ng tard.'
 
I'm sure a GOP admin would've avoided this.


I frankly don't give a sh!t about other countries. 'Merica!
 
Not starved, no. I enjoy it on occasion. GAC!
troll 1986 GIF by absurdnoise
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncfootball-
There are a number of things we let @blazers go on about. Guns aren't one of them. The other? BBQ.

7 lb pork butt, trim the fat, rub a bunch of seasoning and let it sit over nite. Get temp up to 120, smoke with a few hickory chunks for 4 or 5 hrs, after 6 hrs stick a meat thermometer into it, kick that temp to 200 and grab a 6 pack while you wait 3+ hrs til she's done. Post pics, then shred and break out the Texas Pete and any other sauces and sides.

Could you imagine that moron playing with guns? If you didn't already die of trichinosis at his bbq don't worry, he'll get you in the head explaining how the safety works.
 


At least the Somalian's towel matches her shirt and necklace.
And there are people who are actually ignorant enough to vote for those two imbeciles.

So.. a lawyer because a Muppet didn't wave at a kid?
Yet another idiot embracing the “victim” role that Dems push in order to divide us. What message is that woman sending her kids? To sue whenever the slightest perceived slight is directed at you. What a POS she and her “lawyer” are, and I use the term lawyer very loosely.
 
Last edited:
The f*ck are you on about?

I replied to you comment saying "According to strum, the quote was..."

I just shared the video showing said quote. I probably assumed you were in denial of the quote being real given the fact that it made the former POTUS sound like a complete dipshit. You'll have to forgive me for not being completely caught up on the context around here given the endless stream of garbage that gets posted on this thread.

And for the record, I've been a registered Independent since my 18th birthday. Maybe you should pull your head out of your ass and learn how to interact with other human beings without constantly having to fall back on lazy, stupid generalizations. But if you're going to use them, at least make sure the person you're trying to argue with is a member of the group you're generalizing about. Otherwise you just look a 'f-ng tard.'

I'm going with playing ignorant on this one.
 
And there are people who are actually ignorant enough to vote for those two imbeciles.

Yet another idiot embracing the “victim” role that Dems push in order to divide us. What message is that woman sending her kids? To sue whenever the slightest perceived slight is directed at you. What a POS she and her “lawyer” are, and I use the term lawyer very loosely.

I read she was hoping to hit the ghetto lottery.
 
Which article had the cams.. I looked but didnt see it. Maybe I clicked the wrong link.
I don't know that they have released the footage (and haven't read his links), but the police did revise their timeline upon reviewing the mall security cam video. In fact, they gave the good samaritan even more credit because of how quickly he acted and that amount of time was shortened from the original release. Which only serves to further undercut his narrative that everything AR-15 is bad and should be eliminated from the face of the Earth. The fact is, a conceal carry good guy took out the mentally challenged bad guy: handgun against an AR-15. Just another example of it happening. Doesn't do much to support his argument that all those cops in Ulvade couldn't do anything because they were out gunned. He has AR-15 DS much like his TDS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
Read the article b!tch, there is video of the entire incident from mall cams.
I read the article. I read other articles. !5 seconds after the perp began firing was when the hero first returned fire. The police determined that 24 shots were fired by the perp in that 15 seconds but if you have any savvy of reality at all, you know that this is subject to revision as further analysis continues. But I said IF it was believable; I didn't say I didn't believe it, and I based my remarks on the 24/15 supposition...so I am perfectly willing to concede the irrelevant point.


Easily? You're an idiot. It depends on the handgun. Bullet velocity from that Sig Sauer model M400 5.56 is much higher than a typical 9mm handgun for example. And Sig has a higher capacity.
yes easily, with any semi-auto handgun with decent killing power. And I'm an idiot? Anyone who has used a rifle of any kind and has also used a handgun of any kind, knows that because of the barrel length of a rifle, it is easier to swing or otherwise move the handgun onto target. A rifle is more accurate at distance because of that same barrel length and the sighting down that barrel, but then you're also talking about the time it takes to draw a bead. This obviously is not that scenario, but rather it is a scenario of quickly drawing a rough bead on targets within a confined area. A handgun is much better for that. Why do you think a handgun is recommended for home defense over a rifle, moron? It's for just that reason.

Food courts aren't a contained space. Nice try.

I'm sorry, I guess you haven't yet heard of this brand new theory. It's called 'relativity' and the main implication is that everything is relative. You should look into it. A food court area is not confined compared to a matchbox, but it is confined compared to the outdoors or even the main area of a shopping mall. I can link you to some good articles to help you grasp this tricky concept, or suggest a book. Here's one, it's called 'Common Sense for Dummies'.

Meanwhile, the context would indicate to most fairly intelligent people that in the case of a shooting spree where the merits of handgun vs. rifle are being discussed, a food court area in a mall is a confined space...that is, a space where potential victims can not freely disperse in all directions but will tend, because of walls and tables, etc., to stay closer together, making them easier targets for a handgun.


And "taking aim" is different from being accurate. A rifle wins over handgun if you're looking for accuracy. Again, nice try.

Typical shotguns are gonna have way more kick than an AR. If you want to inflict lots of damage on a crowd the smart choice is something easy to wield & aim, low-kick, high-capacity, high velocity, easy to load. Being easy to conceal helps, making an AR-15 style the obvious choice and the reason why you see it over and over.
taking aim is NOT different from being accurate when you're using a handgun vs. a rifle in a food court for the reasons I've already given. One can more surely aim and hit a target with the handgun in that situation, especially if the target is moving. Lining up the barrel (there is no time for sighting) on a moving target is much more difficult with a rifle than with a handgun. You don't even have to have experience to know this, you just have to read the book I suggested.

About your 'accuracy'...IF you are trying to hit a target downrange and you are comparing the rifle to a handgun, of course you can be more accurate with a rifle, especially when taking the time to sight it in. That is NOT the situation in point here.

You're exhibiting complete idiocy now when you try to show knowledge of shotguns. The kick of a shotgun is irrelevant as you are going to have it anchored o your shoulder where it can very quickly be brought back into firing position after each shot, The spread of the shot covers more areas OF COURSE and therefor negates the aiming deficiency of either rifle or handgun to a great extent, and is therefor also much better at hitting moving targets. Either handgun or a rifle will normally place one projectile in a target, whereas a buckshot shell can usually catch multiple targets with shot. Even a single buckshot at relatively close range does a lot of damage
 
Last edited:
I don't know that they have released the footage (and haven't read his links), but the police did revise their timeline upon reviewing the mall security cam video. In fact, they gave the good samaritan even more credit because of how quickly he acted and that amount of time was shortened from the original release. Which only serves to further undercut his narrative that everything AR-15 is bad and should be eliminated from the face of the Earth. The fact is, a conceal carry good guy took out the mentally challenged bad guy: handgun against an AR-15. Just another example of it happening. Doesn't do much to support his argument that all those cops in Ulvade couldn't do anything because they were out gunned. He has AR-15 DS much like his TDS.
It would help his cause if he had even a rudimentary knowledge of guns.
 
I don't know that they have released the footage (and haven't read his links), but the police did revise their timeline upon reviewing the mall security cam video. In fact, they gave the good samaritan even more credit because of how quickly he acted and that amount of time was shortened from the original release. Which only serves to further undercut his narrative that everything AR-15 is bad and should be eliminated from the face of the Earth. The fact is, a conceal carry good guy took out the mentally challenged bad guy: handgun against an AR-15. Just another example of it happening. Doesn't do much to support his argument that all those cops in Ulvade couldn't do anything because they were out gunned. He has AR-15 DS much like his TDS.

Yep, the left is going to keep screwing around with the AR-15 and end up convincing the nutjobs that a handgun is a better choice. When they figure that out then you have a mess.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
Lol. “Best practice”.

"No faking here. Putting your hands behind your back is a best practice while detained, handcuffed or not, to avoid escalating charges like resisting arrest."

so raising a clenched fist to the crowd is another de-escalation move? I believe her, it just sounds so sincere and believable in spite of what it actually looked like. I guess I'm going to have to revisit the 'fake tears' thing again. I mean after all, there were no fake tears or tears of any kind from her when Biden was herding illegals into pens like cattle.
 
Biden tests positive for Covid. Maybe he meant that when he said cancer yesterday. In all seriousness, I hope he has a prompt and speedy recovery.

I think he lacks the ability to be President but I hope he recovers from covid.

Biden is fully vaccinated and received two boosters; his second booster shot was on March 3.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
I think he lacks the ability to be President but I hope he recovers from covid.

Biden is fully vaccinated and received two boosters; his second booster shot was on March 3.
are you kidding? We should all be PRAYING that he recovers. Maybe even sacrifice some virgins or whatever.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Archer2
I read the article. I read other articles. !5 seconds after the perp began firing was when the hero first returned fire. The police determined that 24 shots were fired by the perp in that 15 seconds but if you have any savvy of reality at all, you know that this is subject to revision as further analysis continues. But I said IF it was believable; I didn't say I didn't believe it, and I based my remarks on the 24/15 supposition...so I am perfectly willing to concede the irrelevant point.



yes easily, with any semi-auto handgun with decent killing power. And I'm an idiot? Anyone who has used a rifle of any kind and has also used a handgun of any kind, knows that because of the barrel length of a rifle, it is easier to swing or otherwise move the handgun onto target. A rifle is more accurate at distance because of that same barrel length and the sighting down that barrel, but then you're also talking about the time it takes to draw a bead. This obviously is not that scenario, but rather it is a scenario of quickly drawing a rough bead on targets within a confined area. A handgun is much better for that. Why do you think a handgun is recommended for home defense over a rifle, moron? It's for just that reason.



I'm sorry, I guess you haven't yet heard of this brand new theory. It's called 'relativity' and the main implication is that everything is relative. You should look into it. A food court area is not confined compared to a matchbox, but it is confined compared to the outdoors or even the main area of a shopping mall. I can link you to some good articles to help you grasp this tricky concept, or suggest a book. Here's one, it's called 'Common Sense for Dummies'.

Meanwhile, the context would indicate to most fairly intelligent people that in the case of a shooting spree where the merits of handgun vs. rifle are being discussed, a food court area in a mall is a confined space...that is, a space where potential victims can not freely disperse in all directions but will tend, because of walls and tables, etc., to stay closer together, making them easier targets for a handgun.



taking aim is NOT different from being accurate when you're using a handgun vs. a rifle in a food court for the reasons I've already given. One can more surely aim and hit a target with the handgun in that situation, especially if the target is moving. Lining up the barrel (there is no time for sighting) on a moving target is much more difficult with a rifle than with a handgun. You don't even have to have experience to know this, you just have to read the book I suggested.

About your 'accuracy'...IF you are trying to hit a target downrange and you are comparing the rifle to a handgun, of course you can be more accurate with a rifle, especially when taking the time to sight it in. That is NOT the situation in point here.

You're exhibiting complete idiocy now when you try trying to show knowledge of shotguns. The kick of a shotgun is irrelevant as you are going to have it anchored o your shoulder where it can very quickly be brought back into firing position after each shot, The spread of the shot covers more areas OF COURSE and therefor negates the aiming deficiency of either rifle or handgun to a great extent, and is therefor also much better at hitting moving targets. Either handgun or a rifle will normally place one projectile in a target, whereas a buckshot shell can usually catch multiple targets with shot. Even a single buckshot at relatively close range does a lot of damage
If some of you had been born with about 3 more inches of dick, you might have been much more content individuals.

Brevity would still elude you, though.
 
I have this fear that if I go skydiving, my chute won’t open. Chutes work like 99% of the time. But I just figured I won’t jump out of a plane and run the risk.
Well you're in luck. Modern science has led to the ability to have giant safety nets appear in your landing zone in the event your chute doesn't open, preventing you from an unwanted crash into the ground at terminal velocity.

There are some people who think their religion tells them not to approve of these safety nets, but that shouldn't prevent you from using them. Feel free to jump away....Geronimo!!!
 
  • Haha
Reactions: strummingram
If some of you had been born with about 3 more inches of dick, you might have been a much more content individuals.

Brevity would still elude you, though.
brevity is what you're capable of. Making any kind of rational point is not.
 
According to Strum, this was the quote;

"I see the disinfectant, where it knocks it out in a minute, one minute," Trump said. "And is there a way we can do something like that, by injection inside or almost a cleaning? Because you see it gets in the lungs and it does a tremendous number on the lungs, so it would be interesting to check that."
i most definitely paraphrased his comment re: injecting disinfectant…sorry to confuse you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
I don't know that they have released the footage (and haven't read his links), but the police did revise their timeline upon reviewing the mall security cam video. In fact, they gave the good samaritan even more credit because of how quickly he acted and that amount of time was shortened from the original release. Which only serves to further undercut his narrative that everything AR-15 is bad and should be eliminated from the face of the Earth. The fact is, a conceal carry good guy took out the mentally challenged bad guy: handgun against an AR-15. Just another example of it happening. Doesn't do much to support his argument that all those cops in Ulvade couldn't do anything because they were out gunned. He has AR-15 DS much like his TDS.
" He has AR-15 DS much like his TDS. "

definitely. As do so many other hysterical libs. Even though, as I pointed out, his manslaughtering AR-15 type weapon only managed to hit a handful of people with 24 shots while the hero pumped eight shots into his single target with a handgun. Either eight of out ten or eight out of eight shots, but I think the point is clear either way.

' THEY' have decided that the AR-15 type of rifle is full of demons and that's just how it's going to be. Now all that's left are the irrational rationalizations that the left excels at.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT