Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
Why are we even talking about this? What % of the population is transgendered enough to work thru processes with psychologists enough to get to the point where surgery is even something they want? And then of that tiny subset, how many are prisoners or migrants?Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
under any president, all kinds of shit happens that doesn't fit his/her philosophy. Then again, maybe it does as far as it goes and which might not be indicated by some simplistic blurb. In other words, do you want to try to make us believe that Trump went out of his way, as Kamala Harris boasts about having done, to see that all prisoners who applied could get a taxpayer-paid sex change? Good luck with that stupidity.
I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
Not.the arguments for the States to be represented in a national election have already been well made.
1. It depends on what you give up to have that (dubious) enhancement of the several protections against the tyranny of the majority. You can eliminate drunk driving deaths by eliminating driving. We have good protections vs tyranny of the majority.You and WWJD keep harping on the idea or theme that the EC isn't needed to have an impact on the TOM because of other mechanisms. First, what is wrong with the idea of having more than one method of keeping such an evil suppressed? When one fails, another kicks in.
Excellent point.I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
Do you think the US should offer taxpayer funded gender transition surgeries for prisoners and migrants? A simple "yes" or "no" will suffice.
I asked the question a few days ago, "who would replace Trump when he is out of the picture". I never got a response but here is one from another forum:
When Trump finally dies, this is the interesting question. Trumpism unearthed a really, really ugly American. One that was better left in their cave. Amazingly (and unfortunately) they’re not crawling back in and it looks like they’re here to stay if you play to their ugliness just right. The republicans have sold their souls and latched on to them because they can actually move the needle. Whomever takes the baton from a dead Trump will likely have to lower themselves to appeal to this ugly American. Because if they don’t, someone will.
under any president, all kinds of shit happens that doesn't fit his/her philosophy. Then again, maybe it does as far as it goes and which might not be indicated by some simplistic blurb. In other words, do you want to try to make us believe that Trump went out of his way, as Kamala Harris boasts about having done, to see that all prisoners who applied could get a taxpayer-paid sex change? Good luck with that stupidity.
I have no problem believing that Trump does not disagree with a prison treating a trans like a trans socially and medically, as long as that means that in reality, and as common sense dictates, any sexual treatment is toward the actual sex and not what the prisoner wishes the sex was.
How desperate are you, to present this kind of nothingburger?
We're talking about it because Bozo poasted a tweet as some sort of gotcha attempt that the policy was in place during the Trump years as well. I was just asking his opinion on whether he thinks it's good policy or not, which sadly he couldn't even answer.Why are we even talking about this? What % of the population is transgendered enough to work thru processes with psychologists enough to get to the point where surgery is even something they want? And then of that tiny subset, how many are prisoners or migrants?
Can we debate something which matters?
I agree we should debate something that matters.
I really wonder if YouTube channels like BTC, Pakman, TYT, etc., have really thought this through. If Trump is removed from the American political theater, their content will suffer. I guess there's always something to rail against. But, Trump is the biggest media draw in the history of the United States.If you were still wondering why little whiney beta Trump is afraid to face Harris again.
And, Kari Lake is providing the best UVF natal care in the world.Trump may be the father of ivf but biden is the daddy of vhf
I really wonder if YouTube channels like BTC, Pakman, TYT, etc., have really thought this through. If Trump is removed from the American political theater, their content will suffer. I guess there's always something to rail against. But, Trump is the biggest media draw in the history of the United States.
Oh, I'm sure they all know how to play to their audiences and be prosperous.Have you heard about Fox? Lol. They crush their ratings complaining about the U.S. being too successful under Biden. The difference, I think BTC would gladly trade his channel in exchange for healthy GOP, run by sane normal people.
Oh, I'm sure they all know how to play to their audiences and be prosperous.
You really think Brian Cohen would remove his livelihood for a "healthy GOP?" Whatever that is? He's got a lot invested in his channel to just give it up.
Well, I feel sure that he's got a bright future right where he is.Obviously, I can't speak for him but he has alot of other options to make money.
Ok I get it, critical thinking isn't your thing.
I have to ask, did you mom really not like you or something? You seem very angry.
Lol. You are talking about maybe .0000000001% of the population.
Compared to electing an incompetent felon rapist for president- I (and all over normal people) simply don't give a phuck about a random one off thing that once happened when trump was president.
The funny thing about the trump marks, they get all bend out of shape over idiotic nonsense that doesn't affect them at all, and at any level; while cheerleadering the most repugnant, lowest form of life, who also was the most incompetent person to ever hold that office.
well how about that. I assume you're talking about the people of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA? Knucklehead.Not.
It's "We the people..." not "We the States."
They acted as states to ratify the constitution but it's the people who are supposed to be represented.
nice try, or maybe, learn to read. Take your pick. As I clearly conveyed, the prisoner (and illegal detainee) trans sex change paid for by the taxpayer deal is hardly a nothingburger, and the tweet in question doesn't challenge that notion either. She is obviously seen voicing complete support for this. Intentionally or not, it points out the insanity of Kamala Harris' extreme leftylibness. The nothingburger is noting that 'prisons' supported the care of gender-affirmed prisoners while Trump was in office. Trying to make that seem indicative of anything Trump supports or supported, is just a typical liberal attempt to obfuscate with wordplay, and disingenuously create an issue where none exists. It's so pathetically desperate that when in an attempt to make a mountain out of a molehill, you even have to create the molehill.Glad you agree that trump has spent tens of millions on campaign ads about a "nothingburger". 100% agree with you. Unfortunately, Trump believes in punching down of various classes of people because he believes the majority of his supporters are bigots and racists.
Now, my comment above...I was simply supporting NCtrans' lifestyle choices. Good for him for just being his authentic self.