That's sort of puzzling. Isn't it generally thought that servicemen tend to skew right?
Maybe he has numbers on PA that show otherwise.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Maybe he has numbers on PA that show otherwise.
I'm only seeing one whiney bitch at the moment.PA14 Republican representative doesn't think overseas service people should be allowed to vote in PA.
There's roughly 200 GOP lawsuits currently to not allow U.S. citizens their right to vote.
This is trump's whole strategy. Block votes, still lose and then cry like the whiney little bitch that he's always been. Just like 2020.
Looking forward to seeing another thousand trumptards in prison.
Agreed, but I wouldn't take "just because your son's teacher is a registered sex offender doesn't mean he's going to try to diddle your kid" as an acceptable answer, and don't think we should take it here either. What's the downside of just taking them off the list then?
Interesting snapshot of where the polling stands today vs. on today's date in the last couple of elections
This Day In History - October 30th
This Day In History - October 30th
Last edited:
But it’s not “asking”. It’s a law. Then another law which only exists because the other law was enacted first. Hence the “knee jerk” Bottom line I feel it’s the parents call. Do you agree with that?
Damn... those Clinton bets got their clocks cleaned!
At least, if Trump loses, they can use this as evidence that the election was rigged! I mean, if he were to somehow lose, it would HAVE to be rigged, right?
It's relatively close. The lawsuit wasn't just military. It's also if you were living abroad.
Ah, that might well skew it the other way. If so, that could explain why Rs want to suppress those voters.
The few people I know living abroad have a relatively poor assessment of the US, and especially of Trump.
Whoa, whoa, whoa... seriously? These politicians are out for power, and getting the lobby more wealth, and that makes "every single Trump voter" evil? That's a pretty big stretch. Straight to EVIL, huh? If you say so. I disagree. I know quite a few and none of them are evil, by my standards. I don't agree with their choice for president. But, evil? No, they're not evil.
let's see. A clear-headed individual in full control of his mental faculties who occasionally says stupid things, or a derelict political has-been who has lost control of both his mental faculties and his bowels and occasionally does NOT say stupid things while running the country amuck. You're right, there's not much comparison. I'm still going with Trump, oeuvre and all, especially since Harris is even worse in the 'says stupid things' department..
New word 'oeuvre' though, had to look that one up. It said 'word used mostly by 'fruitcakes' '. And of course by 'fruitcakes', I'm sure that means only in the weirdo sense of the word.
no, I haven't read it because I'm not interested in it, and I'm not going to do so in order to find a single reference somewhere within it. That's why I asked him to do so, since he apparently has read it and since he is the one who either doesn't get the concept of substantiating his claims or deflects from claims that are just bullshit to begin with. See how conservatives are the ones with common sense who back up what they contend and libs are the ones who mostly spew caca? You probably don't.
However, I had already done a quick search on what McMasters has said about Trump in that regard and nothing approaching joeyjoey's claim about Trump seeking to help Putin run all over Western Europe came up. Wouldn't you think a sensational statement like that would be easy to find. Probably not.
As to the question of who I will believe, that depends on WHAT I would be considering believing. That hasn't been presented in any credible form or at all as of yet. See what I'm saying about how common sense works? I doubt you do.
Similar threads
