Joe the retard Either he played a good retard when under questioning or he was really that ****ing stupid.
It is so pathetic you actually believe showing us psychotic shitstains on video is going to change facts against you scum.
this screwed up board is hard on everybody. Please for the love of all that is holy, fix it so that this kid....it might actually be @Heels Noir....will stop rubbing the skin off of his face.
so? Correlation is not causation. How can you be a regular here and not understand this? I remember once I saw an emergency alert come on TV and nothing happened. The alert failed completely to produce an emergency. Calm down, scaredycat, if shit is going to happen, it will happen regardless of any 'shit is going to happen' alert.There is an extremely high correlation between emergency weather warnings and dangerous storms.
Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:Dumb move by Comey. Or was it?
do you actually have any appreciable reading comprehension? The word 'primarily' that you interjected is a product of your need to defend the indefensible. I never implied that abortion was the primary means of birth control for the women I referenced. I said they depended on it as a means of birth control, the implication being that as long as they have BC to fall back on, they are or can be more casual about using whatever would be their primary method.Do you actually understand how sex and pregnancy works? If sexually active women were primarily relying on abortion as birth control then they’d end up needing them every couple of months. That isn’t a tenable solution physiologically or financially.
Shit happens. Women get pregnant even when they’re using birth control. Ectopic pregnancies happen. Miscarriages happen. Rape happens. There are countless reasons why women might elect or need to have an abortion and frankly it isn’t any of your business. And it certainly isn’t the government’s business.
That's why we must force pregnant women to carry to term. It will cut way down on abortions.If sexually active women were primarily relying on abortion as birth control then they’d end up needing them every couple of months.
damn, look how terribly that worked out for the GOP.The GOP is in a tough spot. They know most voters support Roe vs Wade. They were content for 50 years to just campaign on reversing it. Now the SCOTUS comes along and upsets that applecart.
you know what would cut down on abortions even more? Not getting pregnant to begin with. Duh huh.That's why we must force pregnant women to carry to term. It will cut way down on abortions.
actually, what was silly and pathetic was you using said 'gimmick'. Me mocking you over it is hilarious, at least to me...and when it comes to me, I'm what counts.It was funny when I was using that gimmick to mock @randman1 . You trying to mimic me, back to me, is not just unfunny... it's making you look pathetic. Of course, no one said your weren't trying to look pathetic.
How do you propose to enforce that?you know what would cut down on abortions even more? Not getting pregnant to begin with. Duh huh.
Better yet, do as @bluetoe does and turn women off to the point none of them will come near you.you know what would cut down on abortions even more? Not getting pregnant to begin with.
only an idiot fails to realize that one person can very well speak for other people. That one person just doesn't happen tp be you in the case in point. Ask Donald Trump about speaking for other people. The people hw spoke for put him in office. The people he spoke for aren't the virtue-signaling type though, so I can see why the obvious escapes you so readily..I know, that's why I said it.
Only an idiot would claim to speak for other people.
and your limited intellect doesn't allow you to comprehend that I was referring to what was being referred to BY YOU when I said you weren't speaking for other people IN THAT INSTANCE. Dummy.I made a specific point that I wasn't speaking for other people. And, you agreed... now, you're disagreeing with yourself. I'm impressed.
you know what would cut down on abortions even more? Not getting pregnant to begin with. Duh huh.
so you're suggesting that bluetoe should do what bluetoe does? That's brilliant. I wonder what might take longer....you to come up with such idiocy or you figuring out that you are in fact clueless. I vote for the latter, based on you consistently posting such idiocy.Better yet, do as @bluetoe does and turn women off to the point none of them will come near you.
You sound like you know what you're talking about, tranny. There's a first time for everything.Be like @Heels Noir and only have sex with men.
It looks like Donald Trump just appointed Eric as the new Message Board Commissioner and his first duty was to screw up this thread.![]()
Libs dont respond when theu know they have zero ground to stand on. Just like my post a few weeks ago about 'their fair share' but none of them could/would give an answer. Like hens in the barnyard, squawking with no sustanance.No response by the Libs who post here I see. Par for the course. Just like Chappaquiddick and Kennedy, nothing to see here. Another blatant example of Liberal Privilege. There is one set of laws for Dem politicians and one for everyone else.
The self-proclaimed "school teacher" gets yet another flunking grade.no sustanance [sic].
The self-proclaimed "school teacher" gets yet another flunking grade.
![]()
Oh there's nothing wrong with Biden. He's as sharp as a tack. Largest political cover-up in history perpetrated by the lying dims. Prez Autopen!Left wing scum like Schumer blamed Trump and DOGE for the moron mexican navy crashing into the Brooklyn bridge.
They have also blamed Trump/DOGE for the AA-Helo crash and Newark's crappy old airport losing radar for 90 seconds.
I guess biden dying from prostate cancer and dementia will be their fault too....
The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck. If there is no buyer or market for them, they wouldn't be sold. But what you need to do in order to compare equivalents is show us office holders, purportedly someone who supports our country and POTUS, who either market such merchandise or wear it.Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:
![]()
but they see this as merely "anti-Biden merchandise":
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
You never saw the Biden DOJ getting their panties in a wad, but these Trump
sissy britches need something to whine about.
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.Answer the question or can you not support your statements?
And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck.
But they aren't. They are spending about 10 seconds on their computer and the item is ready to be mass generated for the buying public. Those from all walks of life with no special training in the term other than they know it means to get rid of a president who was clearly gone already and now we find out he had cancer and they covered that up as well. And, btw, they did get rid of him, he ran for a second term and lost so badly that his own party staged a coup before his ass got handed to him. Finally, the phrasing and rhyming works much better for 46. You are trying too hard here to make the merchants something nefarious.And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.
But that's a flat out lie. That's not all he did. First, that's his story - he just randomly stumbled across the shells in the sand - you can believe him if you choose to continue to delude yourself about this guy. Maybe that really is what happened. If he had just snapped the photo, laughed about it, AND STOPPED, that would have been fine. However, he's a former mob prosecutor who rose to be the Director of the FBI who is a darling of the msm because of his takes against the orange one. He then chose to post the picture on social media. All the world got to see it. He full well knew what it meant and what he was saying - about a president who has literally had multiple, actual attempts as well as plots to attempt to "86" him. There is no other reasonable manner in which to interpret it than Comey saying kill Trump. Then, to remove any doubt of the original action being a problem, instead of just trying to defend it and tell people to lighten up that it meant nothing like you are claiming, he had to take the post down. Thus, he did far more than simply take a picture as you want to assert. The bottom line is that if there was no intent, nothing wrong with it, and so on, there is absolutely no reason to take it down. You always seem to have almost no grasp on context. It matters.All James Comey did was pull out his phone and take a photo of some shells in the sand.
Yeah, you're right. Because no one ever calls for violence against government officials and office holders, particularly a sitting president. It's inconceivable to think that anyone would be stupid enough to listen to such rhetoric if it were to be used. I mean it would just be downright silly for anyone, lightweight or not, "to play the victim card" when it comes to such actions. It's not like anyone has ever tried such a thing within our own memories, right?Admit it, neither one shows intent to commit a crime, especially the murder of a president, but this is just another opportunity for you ignorant lightweights to play the victim card.
There are several examples, but the one that comes to mind at the moment is one of my own:Do you know the actual definition of "victim"?
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?So the the US civilian radars and air traffic control radio towers infrastructure are falling apart. The new DOT Secretary has unveiled a plan to upgrade the radars to be modernized from 1980s technology.
WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.
This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
Dumb****, it is the job of the USG to make sure the public transportation system is efficient and safe. obama and biden did nothing for 12 years, in fact dumb****....DEI BS ruined the FAA making the skies less safe by blocking qualified white male candidates from ATC schools.Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?
I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.