Joe the retard Either he played a good retard when under questioning or he was really that ****ing stupid.
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
It is so pathetic you actually believe showing us psychotic shitstains on video is going to change facts against you scum.
There is an extremely high correlation between emergency weather warnings and dangerous storms.
The Trump administration will protect us by eliminating the emergency weather warnings.
I don't know why nobody ever thought about doing that before.
The Trump administration will protect us by eliminating the emergency weather warnings.
I don't know why nobody ever thought about doing that before.
this screwed up board is hard on everybody. Please for the love of all that is holy, fix it so that this kid....it might actually be @Heels Noir....will stop rubbing the skin off of his face.
so? Correlation is not causation. How can you be a regular here and not understand this? I remember once I saw an emergency alert come on TV and nothing happened. The alert failed completely to produce an emergency. Calm down, scaredycat, if shit is going to happen, it will happen regardless of any 'shit is going to happen' alert.
Moral of the story...shit happens.
Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:
but they see this as merely "anti-Biden merchandise":
You never saw the Biden DOJ getting their panties in a wad, but these Trump
sissy britches need something to whine about.
Last edited:
do you actually have any appreciable reading comprehension? The word 'primarily' that you interjected is a product of your need to defend the indefensible. I never implied that abortion was the primary means of birth control for the women I referenced. I said they depended on it as a means of birth control, the implication being that as long as they have BC to fall back on, they are or can be more casual about using whatever would be their primary method.
I maintained that the majority of women having abortions were doing so as a matter of convenience, nothing more than a means of avoiding having to raise a child that they created but did not want to bear. A notoriously defensive poster said that was wrong, that most abortions were medically necessary or the result of incest or rape. I then produced a government document that verified my contention....the VAST majority of women were relying on abortion as a means of birth control period; no mitigating factors. Abortions performed due to those other factors were accounted for and they were a very small fraction of the total.
That post is archived but I'm not going to try to retrieve it for your benefit. You can look for it back in this thread or you can search the web and find the document in question.
But back to the main point...if women didn't have abortion as a backstop, they would be more careful about preventing a pregnancy. Of course you'll reject that simple logic and that substantiated fact, because you are a good liberal and with libs, common sense gets thrown out the window in arguments that call for responsibility and human decency
That's why we must force pregnant women to carry to term. It will cut way down on abortions.
you know what would cut down on abortions even more? Not getting pregnant to begin with. Duh huh.
actually, what was silly and pathetic was you using said 'gimmick'. Me mocking you over it is hilarious, at least to me...and when it comes to me, I'm what counts.
only an idiot fails to realize that one person can very well speak for other people. That one person just doesn't happen tp be you in the case in point. Ask Donald Trump about speaking for other people. The people hw spoke for put him in office. The people he spoke for aren't the virtue-signaling type though, so I can see why the obvious escapes you so readily..
and your limited intellect doesn't allow you to comprehend that I was referring to what was being referred to BY YOU when I said you weren't speaking for other people IN THAT INSTANCE. Dummy.
so you're suggesting that bluetoe should do what bluetoe does? That's brilliant. I wonder what might take longer....you to come up with such idiocy or you figuring out that you are in fact clueless. I vote for the latter, based on you consistently posting such idiocy.
You sound like you know what you're talking about, tranny. There's a first time for everything.
It looks like Donald Trump just appointed Eric as the new Message Board Commissioner and his first duty was to screw up this thread.
Libs dont respond when theu know they have zero ground to stand on. Just like my post a few weeks ago about 'their fair share' but none of them could/would give an answer. Like hens in the barnyard, squawking with no sustanance.
Left wing scum like Schumer blamed Trump and DOGE for the moron mexican navy crashing into the Brooklyn bridge.
They have also blamed Trump/DOGE for the AA-Helo crash and Newark's crappy old airport losing radar for 90 seconds.
I guess biden dying from prostate cancer and dementia will be their fault too....
They have also blamed Trump/DOGE for the AA-Helo crash and Newark's crappy old airport losing radar for 90 seconds.
I guess biden dying from prostate cancer and dementia will be their fault too....
The self-proclaimed "school teacher" gets yet another flunking grade.
If the best you can do is point out a usage error and still cant answer the question speaks volumes.
Answer the question or can you not support your statements? You can answer or any of the other troglodytes @What Would Jesus Do?, @prlyles @uncboy10 that suck at the cock of @Heels Noir.
Oh there's nothing wrong with Biden. He's as sharp as a tack. Largest political cover-up in history perpetrated by the lying dims. Prez Autopen!
The not so subtle distinction you fail to see/acknowledge is the difference in position of the person creating or distributing the messages. The "anti-Biden merchandise" samples are from apparel manufacturers and distributers trying to make a buck. If there is no buyer or market for them, they wouldn't be sold. But what you need to do in order to compare equivalents is show us office holders, purportedly someone who supports our country and POTUS, who either market such merchandise or wear it.Innocent enough if you ask me. The MAGA crowd sees this as an assassination threat:
but they see this as merely "anti-Biden merchandise":
You never saw the Biden DOJ getting their panties in a wad, but these Trump
sissy britches need something to whine about.
Comey began his professional life as a clerk for a US Dist Ct judge. He started in the US Attorney's Office in 1987 (helping to prosecute the Gambino family), ultimately rising over the years to become Deputy Attorney General and then the Director of the FBI - that's the highest law enforcement position in our entire country. So, personal opinion is set aside and the duty to our country and things like the Office of the Presidency always come first.
A former mob prosecutor using the "86" reference knew exactly what it meant. But after the backlash, Comey showed his intestinal fortitude and power of his convictions by taking down the post and claiming he didn't mean exactly what he'd said. There's a big difference in the two situations you present. Am I saying that everyone should have gotten their panties in a twist? Not so much, but you're (typically) an idiot if you think the two scenarios you present are the same and that Comey should not have been taken to task for his actions. Nice try though, it was better than the majority of your efforts.
And, in most situations, it may have been "innocent enough", but this is a president that has had two actual assassination attempts and repeated political types calling for exactly that. Kid yourself all you want.
Remind me again of what question I was asked and I will do my best to answer it. And try to do it without butchering the King's English.
And I would argue that these merchants are comparatively going to some trouble designing, manufacturing, and marketing these wares while the customers are forking over real money for them.
All James Comey did was pull out his phone and take a photo of some shells in the sand.
Admit it, neither one shows intent to commit a crime, especially the murder of a president, but this is just another opportunity for you ignorant lightweights to play the victim card.
But they aren't. They are spending about 10 seconds on their computer and the item is ready to be mass generated for the buying public. Those from all walks of life with no special training in the term other than they know it means to get rid of a president who was clearly gone already and now we find out he had cancer and they covered that up as well. And, btw, they did get rid of him, he ran for a second term and lost so badly that his own party staged a coup before his ass got handed to him. Finally, the phrasing and rhyming works much better for 46. You are trying too hard here to make the merchants something nefarious.
But that's a flat out lie. That's not all he did. First, that's his story - he just randomly stumbled across the shells in the sand - you can believe him if you choose to continue to delude yourself about this guy. Maybe that really is what happened. If he had just snapped the photo, laughed about it, AND STOPPED, that would have been fine. However, he's a former mob prosecutor who rose to be the Director of the FBI who is a darling of the msm because of his takes against the orange one. He then chose to post the picture on social media. All the world got to see it. He full well knew what it meant and what he was saying - about a president who has literally had multiple, actual attempts as well as plots to attempt to "86" him. There is no other reasonable manner in which to interpret it than Comey saying kill Trump. Then, to remove any doubt of the original action being a problem, instead of just trying to defend it and tell people to lighten up that it meant nothing like you are claiming, he had to take the post down. Thus, he did far more than simply take a picture as you want to assert. The bottom line is that if there was no intent, nothing wrong with it, and so on, there is absolutely no reason to take it down. You always seem to have almost no grasp on context. It matters.
Yeah, you're right. Because no one ever calls for violence against government officials and office holders, particularly a sitting president. It's inconceivable to think that anyone would be stupid enough to listen to such rhetoric if it were to be used. I mean it would just be downright silly for anyone, lightweight or not, "to play the victim card" when it comes to such actions. It's not like anyone has ever tried such a thing within our own memories, right?
Do you know the actual definition of "victim"?
So the the US civilian radars and air traffic control radio towers infrastructure are falling apart. The new DOT Secretary has unveiled a plan to upgrade the radars to be modernized from 1980s technology.
WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.
This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
WTF did obama and biden do for 12 f-ng years??? Trump had to deal with the wuhan virus for ~2 years, which shelved any big plans across the US. Biden and demoncrats blew like $7T on BS pork spending yet did not upgrade the required tools for the FAA and air traffic controllers for the busiest skies in the world.
This goes to show you demoncrats are a waste of O2, they do nothing but spend our tax dollars on BS which amounts to nothing but debt and weird projects like pushing for non-white males in the cockpit.
There are several examples, but the one that comes to mind at the moment is one of my own:
vic·tim
noun
MAGA lightweight who insists he is being unfairly picked on by superior intellectual forces.
Planes are dropping out of the sky and disappearing from radar screens and we have some uneducated retard like you dispensing blame among the past several U.S. Presidents. Does it get more comical than that?
I will point out one egregious error in you error-laden post: Donald Trump did not have COVID to deal with for ~2 years. Not even close. Then again, a lot of people question if he ever responsibly dealt with it at all.
Dumb****, it is the job of the USG to make sure the public transportation system is efficient and safe. obama and biden did nothing for 12 years, in fact dumb****....DEI BS ruined the FAA making the skies less safe by blocking qualified white male candidates from ATC schools.
Strange when that UNC grad crashed her helo into the AA airline on purpose or accident, left wing scum blamed it on DOGE FAA cuts which did not exist.
The Russia Collusion bullshit and wuhan virus bullshit pretty much put a dent in Trump accomplishing many things. Now he has a mandate from whipping your ass last November so he is making big plans to fix the USA. Which makes scum like you mad, go burn in hell asswipe.
Damn, one word wrong and its a butchering? So, what would the ass whipping yall took in November be called?
Anyway, here is the post.
What is 'their fair share'? Is there a percentage or just an amount your ilk wants to impose? If its so fuggin important, why arent they left leaning billionaires offering to pay more? WHy doesnt Okrah, Dwayne Johnson, Bezos, Buffett, Jay Z, Dr. Dre, etc offer to pay more? Are you only pissed at the conservative billionaires? Why not millionaires too? At what dollar amount is the cut off for the 'pay your fair share' crying stop?
Similar threads
