Walton made a telling comment about that sorta thing years ago. Something like "there are good reasons All Americans ride the bench at UCLA and don't transfer or complain. You fill in the gaps".
What about going to uk makes these kids top 10 picks? They are already that level of prospect before choosing uk. Players like Simmons or Ingram could've chosen uk, didn't, and still went 1-2 in the draft. They have a track record of being a stop off for OADs. Why does that make them a good place to go?
It's like saying most OADs favorite food is pizza. PJ Washington isn't about to start eating more pizza is he? Choosing uk because other OADs go there would be just as irrelevant.
But it's not irrelevant. The fact that Kentucky has effectively recruited top 10 talent and even produced a few stars in the NBA as a result weighs heavily in the minds of these kids when they choose a school. I'm not saying that some of the kids weren't already ready to head to the pros. But it's a snowball effect. You produce one star and others notice. Soon it catches on with everyone. Plus we all know how good of a salesman calipari is.
Yup, a self fulfilling prophecy.
So, up against that Roy can either choose:
a) To play dirty (like some programs likely do),
b) Play dirty within the rules (Like LSU giving Simmons' godfather a job),
c) Keep doing what he's doing: win more games, go to more final fours and rebuild 'the brand' with the players willing to play for him (a few of those being likely first round picks in the coming years)
I'm guessing Roy has chosen option c. It may take a little longer to bear fruit, but he probably sleeps better at night
100%Hype. I think you nailed it. If you want to talk about what choosing uk will actually do for a player, I maintain the answer is very little. If you're asking what the perceived benefit is of choosing uk, it's that you're fast-tracked to the NBA.
Unfortunately the only way to battle the hype is to patiently prove that your process works...
That you show the ability to teach and improve players.
That you produce AA.
That you make deep tourney runs.
That you ultimately put kids in the league.
That you create an environment for kids to come back to later in life.
The only other way is involve yourself with handlers, recruit over kids, push them out the door, and run out a different glorified AAU team every year in hopes that they learn to play together by March.
It's not like we couldn't do that. We're huge. We're Carolina. We have the resources to pull off a brand switch like that and start grabbing the OAD mindset recruits. Why don't we? Because we don't want to. Simple as that. We literally hold ourselves to an old school higher standard. Our Momma's didn't raise us like that. And neither did Dean. I'm glad that's not changing under Roy's watch and I hope it never does. You just have to be patient and hope that enough kids get that. Our continued success makes me have full confidence that they will. PJ Washington just happens not to be one of those kids. We've gotta be OK with that if we still want to be Carolina.
100%
It's not about saying other schools are dirty and UNC isn't. It's about quick fix vs long term fix.
And to make a quick fix there'd be compromises that Roy, the school and most fans don't want (at least that seems the case)
Of COURSE Cal is dirty. Heck we knew that when we hired him. The point is...we don't care!.
You don't pull that lever because you don't sell your soul to become contemporary.What compromises? I don't get it. I don't think we're compromising anything by adapting a bit.
@Ned Cota, this is a topic you and I constantly disagree on, but if we have the resources to pull a brand switch, pull that ****in lever like there's no tomorrow. It's a different world we're living in now with recruiting. You either keep up or get left behind. And for the record I was completely content with what Roy was doing before, I still enjoy that system. But Roy has been on record saying it's difficult to recruit that way now.
Why not make adjustments? Why not try and fix our image and rebuild our brand? I for one do not want to become an afterthought in college basketball.
so good I had to use it 2x.Sorry but you guys are being complete homers if you think UK's track record in the NBA draft is not something that is a real advantage when recruiting. I don't see how you can even argue that it's not.
I agree 100% with you. Cal sells the NBA draft better than anybody. But I feel it's a little bit of smoke & mirrors.Sorry but you guys are being complete homers if you think UK's track record in the NBA draft is not something that is a real advantage when recruiting. I don't see how you can even argue that it's not.
Not a single person said its not an advantage in recruiting.Sorry but you guys are being complete homers if you think UK's track record in the NBA draft is not something that is a real advantage when recruiting. I don't see how you can even argue that it's not.
It takes a lot less than smoke and mirrors to fool HS kids. You know like shiny things.Cal sells the NBA draft better than anybody. But I feel it's a little bit of smoke & mirrors.
Hype. I think you nailed it. If you want to talk about what choosing uk will actually do for a player, I maintain the answer is very little. If you're asking what the perceived benefit is of choosing uk, it's that you're fast-tracked to the NBA.
Unfortunately the only way to battle the hype is to patiently prove that your process works...
That you show the ability to teach and improve players.
That you produce AA.
That you make deep tourney runs.
That you ultimately put kids in the league.
That you create an environment for kids to come back to later in life.
The only other way is involve yourself with handlers, recruit over kids, push them out the door, and run out a different glorified AAU team every year in hopes that they learn to play together by March.
It's not like we couldn't do that. We're huge. We're Carolina. We have the resources to pull off a brand switch like that and start grabbing the OAD mindset recruits. Why don't we? Because we don't want to. Simple as that. We literally hold ourselves to an old school higher standard. Our Momma's didn't raise us like that. And neither did Dean. I'm glad that's not changing under Roy's watch and I hope it never does. You just have to be patient and hope that enough kids get that. Our continued success makes me have full confidence that they will. PJ Washington just happens not to be one of those kids. We've gotta be OK with that if we still want to be Carolina.
Not a single person said its not an advantage in recruiting.
Exactly, it's one of the biggest advantages they have, if not the biggest. How some of our fans jump to the conclusions they do is beyond me. The Top 10 players these days consider themselves OAD for the most part. And they see dook and UK as the quickest way to get to the NBA ASAP. And while we're going to land the occasional OAD, it isn't going to be very often.Not a single person said its not an advantage in recruiting.
Key word from Gary there is "should". He didn't say there isn't one reason why PJ "will" pick uk. He "will" pick uk because he perceives uk to be better at sending OADs to the league. He "should" pick UNC because we are better at developing players and have more playing time for PJ, and he's going to be OAD wherever he goes, uk or elsewhere.Why are you so cranky lately?
Gary said there is not one reason why PJ should chose UK. I provided that reason and people said it was not true.
Stealing one from my boy Shun: SMILE NED! It's a GDTBATH and have a good one!
If a kid's #1 priority is getting to the NBA, he should go to UK. Since 2010, no one has done a better job at doing that and to ignore that is foolish.
Asking a kid to ignore all trends and stats with such an important decision is just being a homer.
We have a ton to offer any 5* prospect that has priorities like immediate playing time, family atmosphere, and talent development. If a prospect's priority is how fast can I get a paycheck, then we do not have as much to offer as UK.
But i think whats being asked is why? Why cant PJ go to the NBA after 1 year at UNC? Does Roy not play inside out? if its 5 OADs I agree, but you would think an elite big man would look and UNC minutes next year and the way Roy feeds his bigs and drool.
There is a correlation between uk and OADs. My point is that the correlation is of a coincidental nature. It is not a causal relationship.If a kid's #1 priority is getting to the NBA, he should go to UK. Since 2010, no one has done a better job at doing that and to ignore that is foolish.
Asking a kid to ignore all trends and stats with such an important decision is just being a homer.
We have a ton to offer any 5* prospect that has priorities like immediate playing time, family atmosphere, and talent development. If a prospect's priority is how fast can I get a paycheck, then we do not have as much to offer as UK.
He can, but the track record is not there of other kids doing so when compared to UK.
It's like...can Dwight Howard hit a free throw? Yeah, about 50% of the time. Can Steph Curry? Yes, 90% of the time. Your future is on the line, who do you want shooting that free throw?
If you're going on past statistics, a kid has to feel much more confident being OAD at UK than at UNC.
There is a correlation between uk and OADs. My point is that the correlation is of a coincidental nature. It is not a causal relationship.
Well said, Oz. The horse is quite dead and is becoming a bloody pulp.Ya know, everyone is saying the same thing here.
We all recognise the advantage UK has in recruiting in relation to NBA production.
Most believe it is perception - not the actual numbers, they're real, but the perception of preparedness.
Some here would like Roy to change the playing style, culture of the program etc to attract a few OAD's, turn around the perception and get back o track. Some of us don't but not all of us don't.
It's an Internet debate.... You go round and round in circles saying the same stuff but 99.99% of the time you won't change your view and you'll change the other guys view less than that.
Agreed...should we start talking Tulane?Ya know, everyone is saying the same thing here.
We all recognise the advantage UK has in recruiting in relation to NBA production.
Most believe it is perception - not the actual numbers, they're real, but the perception of preparedness.
Some here would like Roy to change the playing style, culture of the program etc to attract a few OAD's, turn around the perception and get back o track. Some of us don't but not all of us don't.
It's an Internet debate.... You go round and round in circles saying the same stuff but 99.99% of the time you won't change your view and you'll change the other guys view less than that.
He can, but the track record is not there of other kids doing so when compared to UK.
It's like...can Dwight Howard hit a free throw? Yeah, about 50% of the time. Can Steph Curry? Yes, 90% of the time. Your future is on the line, who do you want shooting that free throw?
If you're going on past statistics, a kid has to feel much more confident being OAD at UK than at UNC.
That is a circular argument, it is like saying I have a 800 credit score and Bank of America gives me a home loan and concluding that Bank of America is the only place anyone with a 800 score can get a home loan.
Vandy is not an option....We are in the running for Knox if Jackson leaves for the NBA.