Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
7-5 would be excellent! Can the coaching staff take a team with talent, limited depth and a history of late game melt downs and turn them around in one off-season? We will probably be favored in 2 games a slight underdog in 3 and a significant underdog in 7. I thing five wins and try to steal number 6 is likely. Better get us the next couple of years as help is on the way!I'm going with 7-5
That is what I'm hoping for. It can be done, and that record could win the Coastal this year
And if frogs had wings... At this point, we’re not top 50, maybe not even top75. So it is a brutal schedule for this team.If we were a Top 25 team...
And if frogs had wings... At this point, we’re not top 50, maybe not even top75. So it is a brutal schedule for this team.
Every Coastal team but UNC made a bowl last season (6 teams). So did USCjr, Wake, App, Clemson, and Moo U (5 teams). That's every FBS team on our 2019 schedule.But no, it's really not. The coastal is awful. SCar and Wake are mediocre. We might only play one Top 25 team all year.
Every Coastal team but UNC made a bowl last season (6 teams). So did USCjr, Wake, App, Clemson, and Moo U (5 teams). That's every FBS team on our 2019 schedule.
And for a team that had only 1 FBS win each of the last two seasons, a schedule filled with bowl teams feels daunting. Obviously things change from one season to the next, but people are looking at things from the perspective of what we know about the last couple years. Obviously, it's not pretty.And?
So if 6-6 "should be considered a successful season" against an "awful Coastal Division", then we're either a downright bad football program right now or the schedule's pretty tough. Or maybe as you say the schedule really isn't very hard and we're just downright pitiful right now.6-6 seems like a fair expectation, and should be considered a successful season especially if we beat our instate rivals. The coastal is awful. SCar and Wake are mediocre. We might only play one Top 25 team all year.
If we finish 11-1, we caught more than lightning in a bottle, considering this schedule and the past 2 seasons we endured.5-7 if we act like UNC football. 11-1 if we catch lightning in a bottle.
Fedora gets 7+ easily with this team/schedule. Anything less from Mack will be a huyge disappointmentAnd for a team that had only 1 FBS win each of the last two seasons, a schedule filled with bowl teams feels daunting. Obviously things change from one season to the next, but people are looking at things from the perspective of what we know about the last couple years. Obviously, it's not pretty.
Wake is going to make the UNC game its in-season bowl.So if 6-6 "should be considered a successful season" against an "awful Coastal Division", then we're either a downright bad football program right now or the schedule's pretty tough. Or maybe as you say the schedule really isn't very hard and we're just downright pitiful right now.
Based on last year's performance, the fact that we're learning new schemes on both sides of the ball, and the almost complete lack of experience at the crucial QB spot, I think we should be at least 17 point dogs to Clemson, and 10 point dogs to Miami and UVA. I won't be surprised if we lose all three of those games and we play all three at home.
Most of the relative tossup games(Wake, GT, VT, Pitt, and State) are all on the road. I think that's a very tough schedule for a team with as many major question marks as our team has. Being an optimist, I think we could end up 7-5 if everything falls our way. But that's a big if and it's predicated on my belief that we have a much better overall staff this year than last.
As stated above, more sound fundamentals, improved discipline, and better play calling are all things I expect to see this year, and the main reasons for my optimism.
agreed. maybe we can cheat and not get caught.If we finish 11-1, we caught more than lightning in a bottle, considering this schedule and the past 2 seasons we endured.
So if 6-6 "should be considered a successful season" against an "awful Coastal Division", then we're either a downright bad football program right now or the schedule's pretty tough. Or maybe as you say the schedule really isn't very hard and we're just downright pitiful right now.
Based on last year's performance, the fact that we're learning new schemes on both sides of the ball, and the almost complete lack of experience at the crucial QB spot, I think we should be at least 17 point dogs to Clemson, and 10 point dogs to Miami and UVA. I won't be surprised if we lose all three of those games and we play all three at home.
Most of the relative tossup games(Wake, GT, VT, Pitt, and State) are all on the road. I think that's a very tough schedule for a team with as many major question marks as our team has. Being an optimist, I think we could end up 7-5 if everything falls our way. But that's a big if and it's predicated on my belief that we have a much better overall staff this year than last.
As stated above, more sound fundamentals, improved discipline, and better play calling are all things I expect to see this year, and the main reasons for my optimism.
SoCar might get beat up by the SEC, but we play Game 1. SoCar will be fresh and ready to start the season well.But no, it's really not. The coastal is awful. SCar and Wake are mediocre. We might only play one Top 25 team all year.
South Carolina has a brutal schedule. They play the preseason Top 3 teams, as well as @TAMU and @UF. They are looking at 4-5 no doubt, sure fire losses before they even get to the toss ups. We have one such game.
Sure it would be nice to trade say Wake and App for Toledo and Marshall, but the schedule is very manageable.
I agree 100%Fedora gets 7+ easily with this team/schedule. Anything less from Mack will be a huyge disappointment
Now that made me laugh. Last year’s schedule was easier, we had Holcomb who was our best defensive player, players familiar with our system on both sides of the ball, and could still only win 2 games.Fedora gets 7+ easily with this team/schedule. Anything less from Mack will be a huyge disappointment
Holcomb was not our best defensive player. It was Carney. I think Crawford would have been the best if healthy. We were down a mountain of players including QB and were in every game except Miami.Now that made me laugh. Last year’s schedule was easier, we had Holcomb who was our best defensive player, players familiar with our system on both sides of the ball, and could still only win 2 games.
That is the hole to be filled. If a UNC coach cannot show within 3 years that he can fill it, then fire him and take another shot.Coaches Poll is out, no Coastal teams in the Top 25. Not unexpected, but still pretty damn embarrassing.
3 years is a short leash. I do think you should be able to see marked improvement within that time frame. We’re already recruiting at a level we haven’t seen in several years.That is the hole to be filled. If a UNC coach cannot show within 3 years that he can fill it, then fire him and take another shot.
that's my feeling. a bowl win would make it a winning season which would be great....6-6 would be a good regular season, anything more would be gravy all things considered.
True. We also looked at our schedule and thought it would be a lot tougher.Interesting reread. It's crazy how those first two wins changed expectations for this year. A lot of people went from hoping/wanting 5-6 wins, to being disappointed with 5-6 wins.