I saw it and agreed with it. The point is you have to gear your attack around your personal. The UNC ball movement has been woeful, needs to improve, but the Bellermine type is due to being devoid of play makers. Whole different need for an offensive style/philosophy.
Better ball movement with the intent of getting your elite scorers in the best position to score, as Pete Newell preached is what any offense should be about, the way to do it varies based on personal. There is plenty to glean from many teams styles of offense, Bellermine's included, but looking too hard at one can be counter productive and blind you to your teams dynamic, as the pieces are apples and oranges.
No harshness intended on my end if you were offended from what you thought I did not notice you mention in your post, and certainly none taken by me from your reply.
Nor did I intend to come off harsh in my reply!
To me, the best aspects of any offense revolve around player movement which in turn allows for great ball movement. That is what really impresses me with Bellermine, that ball moves because their players move, the ball does not get stuck in 1 guys hands, they do not pound the ball around the horn like we do.
Yes, the Bellarinas are devoid of true play makers, not like we have a lot of them either, we have great athletes in our back court for sure but they are not what I consider play makers (note: I do not consider calling your own number play making). Our offense is forced, it isn't the smooth UNC offensive attack we knew and that is due to a severe lacking in ball movement and players standing around rather than moving with a purpose. Right now, defenses are dictating our offense, in other words the other teams defense is attacking us rather than our offense attacking them. IN order to attack the opponents you have to force them to move from their basic positions.
One of the things I see discussed is that teams have now scouted and game planned for the plays we ran that took us thru that last NCAAT, that they can not work now because they have been scouted. Yes but teams scouted Dean's teams, in fact Dean didn't really care that much about scouting opponents, his thing was execute what we do properly and it does not matter if the other teams know what we are going to do. My point is that a great offensive attack executed properly wins, period the end.
Any system that gets the kind of player and ball movement I see with Bellermine gets my attention, I would like to see a LOT more screening action, purposeful screening action, screen the screener then pop to a spot with a passing lane to you and if it is not there IMMEADIATELY cut back thru the lane to set another screen to pop off from. I want to see more screens set than the number of times the ball hits the court with the dribble in the half court! You have great athletes on the level that UNC has, this would be amazing to watch, if we could get them to execute it constantly and consistently.