Probably the most important factor would be economic stability for the middle class. Clinton also balanced the budget and erased the deficit during his administration. No mean feat, especially considering at the time of his inauguration he was faced with the largest deficit in American history. So we were doing pretty well until Bush came along and crashed our economy with his deregulation policies, while at the same time blowing multiple trillions of dollars on a war in Iraq that further destabilized the region.
I get it though. Most of the people on this board hold an extreme partisan bias. So they use words like "evil" or "traitor" a bit too liberally with anyone who is on the other side of the fence.
But at the end of the day, every single one of these candidates have been bought off by special interest groups and large private donors. They don't care what any of us think. At all. Except for the one guy who refused to have a super PAC and take big money. Bernie Sanders.
So the middle class has become less stable under Obama than any other president in history. Are we then in agreement that he is at least the worst president since reconstruction?
As far as Bush and the middle class, that didnt go south til the subprime explosion, correct?