ADVERTISEMENT

Republican Debate

I never said he erased the debt. The deficit and the national debt are two different things...

It isn't possible to erase the debt so long as we keep the Fed around.
Duh. Who the hell do you think controls the Fed? I know , I know you will claim it's private. You are just that naive. The Fed should be eliminated today and we can actually become a free capitalist economy again. Even a progressive like Wilson after signing the fed reserve act said "I fear I have doomed the citizens of this country". The only reason the fed keeps interest rates at virtual 0 is so we can at least pay the interest on our sky rocketing debt.
 
Duh. Who the hell do you think controls the Fed? I know , I know you will claim it's private. You are just that naive. The Fed should be eliminated today and we can actually become a free capitalist economy again. Even a progressive like Wilson after signing the fed reserve act said "I fear I have doomed the citizens of this country". The only reason the fed keeps interest rates at virtual 0 is so we can at least pay the interest on our sky rocketing debt.

Private bankers control the fed. And they rely upon maintaining an ignorant electorate that is too busy fighting over partisan BS to ever come together as a country and rise up against those people who own our country and exploit its people.

I agree that the Fed should be eliminated so I'm not even sure what your point is.
 
Lol Soros and Buffett are both advocates for higher taxes on themselves... Pretty sure Gates is also for a progressive tax code. That was downright silly.
I guess you just don't understand economics. They blow that hot air but Buffet is fighting a tax issue with the IRS right now. Buffet is nothing but a liar and a phony he takes a salary of next to nothing and takes all his income as investment dividends as does Gates taxed at 15%. It is pretty Fing easy to be for something that will not affect you. You need to wake up. As far as Gates that goof ball said global warming is the fault of capitalism. What? WTF has benfited more in this world from capitalism than Gates?? You are just incapable off seeing its all for show with these guys.
 
Private bankers control the fed. And they rely upon maintaining an ignorant electorate that is too busy fighting over partisan BS to ever come together as a country and rise up against those people who own our country and exploit its people.

I agree that the Fed should be eliminated so I'm not even sure what your point is.
Private bankers mostly controlled by the democrat party. Virtually every one big dem donors.
 
Lol you keep telling yourself that.

Exactly the reason you get the response you do. Everyone else is entitled to their beliefs and opinions. That does include you also. Where people take offense is your laissez fare approach to debating in that your opinion is the only one that matters. Its a BIG universe man that you are just a speck of a fraction of a piece of.
 
Private bankers mostly controlled by the democrat party. Virtually every one big dem donors.

You have that dead backwards. Democrats don't control any private bankers. Private bankers control both parties. Maybe you should take a look at the top donors again. Quite a lot of banks who were top contributors to BOTH.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Exactly the reason you get the response you do. Everyone else is entitled to their beliefs and opinions. That does include you also. Where people take offense is your laissez fare approach to debating in that your opinion is the only one that matters. Its a BIG universe man that you are just a speck of a fraction of a piece of.

I never said he wasn't entitled to his opinion. I just laughed at him sharing his absurd opinion as if it were a statement of fact. Arguing that Christianity is not man made is downright silly. That's my opinion, and its supported by a lot more than just blind faith. All opinions are not created equal.
 
The Democrat party is the biggest supporter of billionaires that there has ever been . Billionaires like Gates , Soros , Buffet and many others are big supporters because they have achieved the ultimate and don't want anybody else to get there. Benefits for the Poor??? I get so sick and tired of hearing about the poor , the poor ,the poor could start by helping themselves and not always waiting for more hand outs. Do you know why when you go to a park and see signs that say "don't feed the animals" do you know why? It's because if you do they will expect it and won't fend for themselves and the human animal is the same in an even worse way. "Tax cuts for billionaires" are you really naive enough to believe that?? The tax cuts will only effect guys like me trying to make it to the next rung , the billionaires will always find a way around the system and the people making 150k to 350k will be the ones bearing the burden. Making 150 to 350k is hardly a billionaire and most of us can't set up our own "Clinton family initiative" and escape taxes. Wake the "F" up.
My point, which was unsurprisingly lost on you, was that both of those descriptions of the party platforms are caricatures of reality. But please, continue explaining how much worse the "burden" is for you and your six-figure salary than for those lucky-ass poor people and all their free stuff.
 
I never said he wasn't entitled to his opinion. I just laughed at him sharing his absurd opinion as if it were a statement of fact. Arguing that Christianity is not man made is downright silly. That's my opinion, and its supported by a lot more than just blind faith. All opinions are not created equal.

It's your opinion that not all opinions are created equal. What is substantial to you might not be substantial to me. Stop trying to pass your judgement and indictments as fact, when in reality they're not.
 
Ben Carson suffers from the stupid-smart person complex. Despite being a brilliant neurosurgeon, he repeatedly says things that are laughably stupid.
Kind of like Hillary and "you mean like with a cloth". or Odumbo when he starts stuttering giving away that he is going to start lying?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tru Blu Tar Heel
I mean when you believe something that has been totally disproven by science, it crosses the line from faith to ignorance. It isn't about what the dems would do to him, he disqualifies himself.



Well President Obama was also a Senator, and taught Constitutional Law at Harvard for quite awhile. Much better qualifications than being gifted at brain surgery.
allegedly , he refuse to release any of his grades and he did nothing as a senator. taught constitutional law but not 1 person has ever stepped forward that took one of his classes.
 
Last edited:
Yeah coming from a guy who gets nothing but soft toss questions from the online degreed media and gave up everything to Iran without even getting back the 4 hostages......great accomplishment and Putin has basically pissed in his face and laughed about it. Love how the sheep in the audience laugh as he says nothing funny and stutters thru it.
 
Lol Soros and Buffett are both advocates for higher taxes on themselves... Pretty sure Gates is also for a progressive tax code. That was downright silly.

They can pay extra whenever they are so inclined.
 
My point, which was unsurprisingly lost on you, was that both of those descriptions of the party platforms are caricatures of reality. But please, continue explaining how much worse the "burden" is for you and your six-figure salary than for those lucky-ass poor people and all their free stuff.
I'm willing to work for it and should not have to give up 35-40% of it. People will not work if things are just given to them...pretty basic concept.
 
I'm willing to work for it and should not have to give up 35-40% of it. People will not work if things are just given to them...pretty basic concept.
Just be thankful you weren't earning that much in the "good ol' days" (aka the 40s, 50s, 60s, & 70s), when the top tax rate was as high as 94% and never lower than 70%. Taxes are actually remarkably low right now when you look at the history of this country.
 
  • Like
Reactions: uncboy10
There's nothing even remotely "anti-American" about him. Let me guess, he's also a member of the Muslim Brotherhood, and helped plan 9/11 too?
He is at best only a muslim sympathizer a religion who's focal point is a pedophile.
 
And furthermore, the GOP candidates had no problem standing up to the bullshit from the moderators.

Just another bullshit lie from an awful human being. It's a testament to how terrible Hillary is to be compared with this loser.
I am pretty sure Cruz wiped the floor with those featherweights from CNBC.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UNC71-00
You have that dead backwards. Democrats don't control any private bankers. Private bankers control both parties. Maybe you should take a look at the top donors again. Quite a lot of banks who were top contributors to BOTH.
ahhhh so you agree the democrats support billionaires
 
ahhhh so you agree the democrats support billionaires

Yeah which is why I'm an independent. The bi-partisan system is a charade that ensures that the country remains in a state of perpetual polarization. There is no better system for those who want to maintain the status quo.
 
Yeah which is why I'm an independent. The bi-partisan system is a charade that ensures that the country remains in a state of perpetual polarization. There is no better system for those who want to maintain the status quo.

How do you define "independent"?
 
You mean during a period of almost exclusively democrat presidents and congress?

Damn right I am thankful.
I admit I haven't looked this up, but you're saying that Democrats controlled the White House and Congress for 40+ years?! You might want to be careful here because I think there was also pretty robust growth during most of that era.
 
I admit I haven't looked this up, but you're saying that Democrats controlled the White House and Congress for 40+ years?! You might want to be careful here because I think there was also pretty robust growth during most of that era.
it was a different type of democrat party in many ways.
 
Duh if you made 30k (good money in '80) in 1980 then doesn't go very far in 2015 and when the tax rates were highest in those years very few made that kind of money.
Do you know how progressive taxation works? You do realize the tax brackets were different then too, right? You didn't have to make $400K to be subject to the highest bracket the way you do now. In other words, if you were wealthy for the time back then, you were subject to the highest bracket, which was 90%. If you're wealthy by today's standards now, you're subject to the highest bracket now, which is only 39.5%.

ETA: The top bracket actually was $400K for a few years back then, but it was also as low as $100K for a while (even under Reagan). The point remains that the top rates only apply to people who are very wealthy, even for their time. If your point is the top bracket and rate should be higher, I could probably get behind that.
 
Last edited:
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT