Suit yourself. To me, that only shows you weren't genuine about the offer to begin with.
And once again, you are wrong. I simply decided to follow one of those verses in the Bible and not cast my pearls before swine.
Suit yourself. To me, that only shows you weren't genuine about the offer to begin with.
When you make statements like that you're simply trying to con yourself into believing it, when the opposite is evident to everyone else. You are passive-aggressive in your mocking of anyone that doesn't glam onto your every edict as if it were gospel from on high. You like to hear yourself talk, and in your mind the rest of us are simpletons for not seeing every argument you make as complete and total fact.
I call BS.
You could not be more wrong, in my opinion. I guess it is just the way different personalities read things. I don't get that at all from him.
Call BS. Call them collect.When you make statements like that you're simply trying to con yourself into believing it, when the opposite is evident to everyone else. You are passive-aggressive in your mocking of anyone that doesn't glam onto your every edict as if it were gospel from on high. You like to hear yourself talk, and in your mind the rest of us are simpletons for not seeing every argument you make as complete and total fact.
I call BS.
Of course you don’t. You’re the same person.I don't get that at all from him.
Thank you! That was perfectly, eloquently stated.You could not be more wrong, in my opinion. I guess it is just the way different personalities read things. I don't get that at all from him.
I take everything he says as something to try and learn from. I don't always agree but I think he truly has a kind heart and wants to hopefully give a new perspective to think about, hopefully that will free many from the chains that confine them by what they allow to be indoctrinated and sometimes forced on us without necessity. We COULD be more free as a society and do just fine but most of you DO live in fear of everyone and everything.
Call BS. Call them collect.
I love hearing myself talk! I love making myself THINK! I enjoy sharing my thoughts here! If I come-off to you, or anyone else, as being superior, then I humbly, HUMBLY apologize. I take my thoughts and words very seriously and I don't play-around with them in discussions like this. Reading words and hearing words are different. So, maybe there is a disconnect there.
If I am passive-aggressive, then I need to work on that. It's not malicious or intentional.. I hope! You are the one who stuck-it-out-there that freedom needed to be restricted sometimes. To me, that is a very, very dangerous line of thinking. Maybe I do resort to passive-aggressive because I'm trying to move away from calling people I disagree with an idiot, directly.
Of course you don’t. You’re the same person.![]()
We're ALL "the same person", actually. All members of a larger body.Of course you don’t. You’re the same person.![]()
You're not passive aggressive... that is from THEIR mind.... they get what they give, remember that.
Actually, the poll that was done a while back showed that the majority wasn't Trump supporters.Knowing that the vast majority of posters here are Trump supporters
Did I miss something?
I am absolutely certain that "all Trump supporters" are not idiots. I think supporting Trump is a foolish thing to do. But, I don't think the individuals are idiots. I think they're being exploited. I think Clinton supporters are being exploited.Knowing that the vast majority of posters here are Trump supporters and then posting videos that are intended to mock Trump supporters isn't passive-aggressive? That doesn't insinuate that ALL Trump supporters are idiots? Doing that ish on a regular basis isn't passive-aggressive?
Oh of course not. Once again...BS.
Once again as well, REALLY? How many threads have been started about Johnson supporters being idiots?
I am absolutely certain that "all Trump supporters" are not idiots. I think supporting Trump is a foolish thing to do. But, I don't think the individuals are idiots. I think they're being exploited. I think Clinton supporters are being exploited.
If you cannot look at those interviews objectively, then I'm sorry. Pull yourself away from supporting the guy that THEY support, and maybe you can see how ignorant they appear (and funny).
Trump's platform, Clinton's platform, any politicians platform, is built on blocks of fear. They are playing to our fears. "This is bad, that is bad, this is bad because of those people." And, that ball rolls and rolls and then you get people who believe we need to build a wall or bomb innocent people in order to be safe and happy.
You are the one who stuck-it-out-there that freedom needed to be restricted sometimes. To me, that is a very, very dangerous line of thinking.
I am absolutely certain that "all Trump supporters" are not idiots. I think supporting Trump is a foolish thing to do. But, I don't think the individuals are idiots. I think they're being exploited. I think Clinton supporters are being exploited.
If you cannot look at those interviews objectively, then I'm sorry. Pull yourself away from supporting the guy that THEY support, and maybe you can see how ignorant they appear (and funny).
Trump's platform, Clinton's platform, any politicians platform, is built on blocks of fear. They are playing to our fears. "This is bad, that is bad, this is bad because of those people." And, that ball rolls and rolls and then you get people who believe we need to build a wall or bomb innocent people in order to be safe and happy.
Pedophilia is not a "freedom." Do you disagree?The freedoms I stuck out there as needing to be restricted was pedophilia. Do you disagree?
Pedophilia is not a "freedom." Do you disagree?
I am absolutely certain that "all Trump supporters" are not idiots. I think supporting Trump is a foolish thing to do. But, I don't think the individuals are idiots. I think they're being exploited. I think Clinton supporters are being exploited.
If you cannot look at those interviews objectively, then I'm sorry. Pull yourself away from supporting the guy that THEY support, and maybe you can see how ignorant they appear (and funny).
Trump's platform, Clinton's platform, any politicians platform, is built on blocks of fear. They are playing to our fears. "This is bad, that is bad, this is bad because of those people." And, that ball rolls and rolls and then you get people who believe we need to build a wall or bomb innocent people in order to be safe and happy.
Pedophilia is not a "freedom." Do you disagree?
I see pedophilia as an illness that needs to be treated.
With a baseball bat. JMHO
You weren't serious about what??? Obviously I didn't "know it" because I'm not even sure what you're saying.I didn't say you believed it...I said you insinuated it with your posts, and that was passive-aggressive.
EXACTLY! I wasn't serious and you know it, yet you continue to grind that axe. Passive-aggressive
Let me play devil's advocate here. If pedophilia is an illness, then wouldn't homosexuality be an illness too? They're both a type of sexuality that is not "normal."I see pedophilia as an illness that needs to be treated.
Thinking that curing something by beating a person with a baseball bat is a sickness that needs to be treated as well. You think using a bigger baseball bat will cure it?With a baseball bat. JMHO
Thinking that curing something by beating a person with a baseball bat is a sickness that needs to be treated as well. You think using a bigger baseball bat will cure it?
Let me play devil's advocate here. If pedophilia is an illness, then wouldn't homosexuality be an illness too? They're both a type of sexuality that is not "normal."
we technically could define all forms of sexuality that way other than laying down in missionary position and allowing the male to impregnate the female, no fun added in.
To procreate, yes. I don't know what kind of fun you have sexually or don't have but if you limit yourself to just procreation and missionary then my friend you are wasting a perfectly good motorcycle because there is TONS of fun to be had with those road trips!!!!!Isn't that the way you're supposed to do it? Just askin'...
Please enlighten me.![]()
Well, whose to say that an underage child can't consent? The concept of consenting is relative and subjective. The definition of an adult is too. You can't measure someone's life in years, because years are an amount of time. Time is just an illusion and a construct of man.Given that homosexuality is between consenting adults, no.
Well, that's not going to work. That would just make me want to leave this plane of existence.other than laying down in missionary position and allowing the male to impregnate the female, no fun added in.
Probably not a road you want to travel down with her.Please enlighten me.
I see your point but boy did you open a can of worms when you went there!Let me play devil's advocate here. If pedophilia is an illness, then wouldn't homosexuality be an illness too? They're both a type of sexuality that is not "normal."
That was actually my goal. Trying to poke the bear a little.I see your point but boy did you open a can of worms when you went there!
I'm not spinning anything.Spin it however you like. It's basic common sense.
There's a reason the cliche as a kid -"put your hand in the light socket once and you won't do it again" exists. I promise - and this post can go on record (I don't give a damn) - let someone come up to one of my daughters... Trust me, they aren't waiting for "their civil rights to be read." Again, spin away...doesn't phase me in the least.
I don't believe there is a line. It continues to evolve as human beings continue to evolve. And the moral compass is a relative thing that everyone has based on their perception of the world.I see your point but boy did you open a can of worms when you went there!
There are many types of sexual behavior which were once considered "abnormal" that are now routinely accepted. We keep expanding the definition of what is "normal". Will pedophilia one day be considered "normal", simply because there is a certain percentage of the population which practices it? Who arbitrarily says that 18 is the minimum age to be considered an "adult" and have consensual sex?
Marriage was once defined as a union of a heterosexual male and a heterosexual female. That definition is being redefined right before our eyes. What if I want to have multiple wives. Isn't that my right as long as I'm not hurting anyone and my "wives" agree? So should the discrimination against polygamists be tolerated?
My point being, where do you draw the line? Is anything and everything "normal" just because it feels good or you want to do it? We have lost our moral compass.
I just wanted to be clear that I'm not Superior to you because you don't want to clarify what you said.Oh to hell with it, Strum. I've got reports to do.