ADVERTISEMENT

Sexual Harassment

When I am offering my personal perspective, then I have no doubt it will sound biased, prejudiced, even superior to those who disagree witj my stance. .

You should start all of your poasts with "IMO", that way we'll know it's just your perspective and we can all keep scrolling onto the next poast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
Probably a better way of saying it is that "Southerners are people of conviction and are more loyal to their beliefs". The way you said it - "behind socially - insinuates that Southerners are on the wrong side. That's subjective.
Fair enough. Wrong is subjective. But, in another 20-50 years, homosexuals will be preachers and pastors. Truth be told, they already are, and always have been. But, in those years, they can do it openly and without condemnation of their congregation... except the really old ones.
 
You should start all of your poasts with "IMO", that way we'll know it's just your perspective and we can all keep scrolling onto the next poast.
You can be my press secretary. I do appreciate the suggestions... for riz-zeal.
 
You're the one that said it was, damn. I just ask you to explain how it is. I even highlighted it in your post for you.
I did? I said heterosexuality was antithetical to natural biology. How about that. I was wrong. It is not.
 
"Unlearned" is not what I would call it at all. You're definitely "learned." You are obviously learned. You state as much.

And, "not agreeing" with homosexuality is your choice, and your prerogative. But, you were taught that prejudice. You were taught that it was "wrong" based on your religion. Taught, learned, whatever you wanna call it. I believe that what you learned is antithetical to natural biology. And, yes, continuing to cling to that belief that some sort of male parental figure in the sky is going to punish you after your body stops working by sending you to an eternal fire pit is archaic and holding-back the species, as a whole. But, by all means, keep clinging to it, if that's what you want to do. I'll keep tolerating it and tossing-in a few "passive-aggressive" comments along the way.

If you want to debate homosexuality, I'll gladly do that. Your fear of it (or "not agreeing with it") is rooted entirely in your church/religious beliefs. Am I right?


Or you could just sit there and shut-up about what you think of @Grayhead's beliefs. You don't always have to let your opinion be known. I realize you get off on your little soapbox diatribes where you attempt to look smarter/more empathetic/better read than everyone else. But if you were that secure in your own beliefs and opinions, you wouldn't feel so compelled to always let them be known. You'd just be happy to be so superior to everyone else in private. We'd all be happier too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raising Heel
And, "not agreeing" with homosexuality is your choice, and your prerogative. But, you were taught that prejudice. You were taught that it was "wrong" based on your religion. Taught, learned, whatever you wanna call it. I believe that what you learned is antithetical to natural biology.
Nah, you were right. No way did you say that.
 
Or you could just sit there and shut-up about what you think of @Grayhead's beliefs. You don't always have to let your opinion be known. I realize you get off on your little soapbox diatribes where you attempt to look smarter/more empathetic/better read than everyone else. But if you were that secure in your own beliefs and opinions, you wouldn't feel so compelled to always let them be known. You'd just be happy to be so superior to everyone else in private. We'd all be happier too.
You have that ignore button handy... use it. I always read your ego-driven contributions. I don't bitch about them... always. So, it's Baby Steps for me.

ETA:

He was speaking to me. He quoted me. If you don't like my replies, to HIM... that's a YP.
 
You have that ignore button handy... use it. I always read your ego-driven contributions. I don't bitch about them... always. So, it's Baby Steps for me.

But I'm not the one claiming to be above everyone else. You're the one that attempts to paint yourself as intellectually superior to everyone else at this board. Then why such the insecurity of having to always tell people where they went wrong? It's just kind of contradictory to the whole persona you've tried to build here.
 
But I'm not the one claiming to be above everyone else. You're the one that attempts to paint yourself as intellectually superior to everyone else at this board. Then why such the insecurity of having to always tell people where they went wrong? It's just kind of contradictory to the whole persona you've tried to build here.
I'm not claiming to be anything. I am offering my thoughts and perspectives. If you interpret them as me "claiming to be superior" then that is your interpretation. I've never, that I can recall, prefaced anything (or followed-up) by stating "What I am saying, and how I believe, is emphatically superior to everyone else here."

I don't have a church or religion following me around. I don't want one. I don't have a book that legions of people accept as the be-all-end-all truth for perpetuity. I'm merely pointing-out the conditions that we find ourselves in and how I agree, or disagree, with them, depending on what they are.

If my contributions sound, read, come-off, appear-to-be, or even hint that I am superior? It's not because I claimed they were or insisted they are. It might (just might) indicate doubt, or, at the very least, uncertainty, on the part of those who are trying to challenge me or disagree with me. I will formally state, right now, that my observations and perceptions are mine, and only mine. They may be different, but they are in no way superior... or inferior.
 
I meant that homosexuality is perfectly natural. Sorry for any confusion.

Nah. The purpose of any species' existence is to procreate. Yes, I know that homosexuality supposedly has been observed in the wild. But one could argue that any time it occurs, it is a defective model for it is not serving it's most basic function - the ability to procreate.
 
Nah. The purpose of any species' existence is to procreate. Yes, I know that homosexuality supposedly has been observed in the wild. But one could argue that any time it occurs, it is a defective model for it is not serving it's most basic function - the ability to procreate.

The purpose for any species is to procreate? That's it? Wow... that was a lot of wasted time in all those science classes. All of those people studying and conducting experiments.. pfft! Pish-posh! The purpose is to procreate. How about, um... bullshit?

Lack of procreation is also ideal when the "purpose" has gotten out-of-control and is purposing too much.
 
But one could argue that any time it occurs, it is a defective model for it is not serving it's most basic function - the ability to procreate.
I would argue that you're a defective model and shouldn't procreate. However, your progeny may surprise us and show us something different than their sire.
 
Just because you can doesn't mean you should. That's also part of the purpose of a species.
 
The purpose for any species is to procreate? That's it? Wow... that was a lot of wasted time in all those science classes. All of those people studying and conducting experiments.. pfft! Pish-posh! The purpose is to procreate. How about, um... bullshit?

Lack of procreation is also ideal when the "purpose" has gotten out-of-control and is purposing too much.


You can get as mad as you want and use all the expletives you like. But it doesn’t change the fact that the purpose of any species’ existence is to procreate. Evolution has taught us just that - life has no purpose but to perpetuate the survival of DNA.
 
You see me as "looking down" on you? I'M NOT! You "partied with hundreds of homos" and, never condoned their "lifestyle." And, then, you also said it "looks unnatural." All of those are indications of "looking down" on them. Cracking homo jokes is another example of that. Whenever you engage in any of that, you're reinforcing whatever it is that you "disagree with." Just like I do.

And, your religion is teaching a hatred, at its core. It's teaching people to fear the behavior. It teaches them that if you engage in it, you will burn for eternity in some cavernous lake of fire. That is, to me, a fairy tale that is egregious and detrimental to the culture, society, and species.

I'm glad you could party with homos. Try realizing that having sexual and feelings of affection and love for people with the same genitalia is just as natural, and should be celebrated, as if you have almost-the-same body parts (as with males and females).

I'm not giving up freedoms. I'm accepting natural inclinations of the progress and evolution of the universe as a whole.

And, you DO "fear the homo." You admitted to it several times. Denial isn't helping you either.
Ok. Point out where I fear them. I can work with them, shop with them, eat at dining establishments with them, and so forth. As for my partying with them, it was a drug fueled state I was in at the time. They made passes at me. I always let them know I was straight. If one had pressed the issue, I would have cracked his head. Never did any of them press an agenda towards me. They never spoke about the so called injustice of life and society.
As for my point to be proven, yuou have made me outr to be some kind of boogey man because I call myself Christian and will not condone their lifestyle. This is the kind of crap everyone keeps pointing out to you. Outside of sports and music, you are the end all tell all of opinions. No one else's views are correct but your own. You proved it by labeling me as a homophobe. You would probably be more well received if you change your approach. You were willing to discuss this topic, but it didn't make it past 2 replies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
You can get as mad as you want and use all the expletives you like. But it doesn’t change the fact that the purpose of any species’ existence is to procreate. Evolution has taught us just that - life has no purpose but to perpetuate the survival of DNA.
Humans have the choice of pleasure. Some desire man on man pleasure. It goes against natural design. Kinda like skydiving. We don't do it unless we really want to. We were not made to fly
 
You can get as mad as you want and use all the expletives you like. But it doesn’t change the fact that the purpose of any species’ existence is to procreate. Evolution has taught us just that - life has no purpose but to perpetuate the survival of DNA.
please try to convince the religious people of that would you please?

I don't buy it but maybe they will.
 
Humans have the choice of pleasure. Some desire man on man pleasure. It goes against natural design. Kinda like skydiving. We don't do it unless we really want to. We were not made to fly
You're not flying when you're skydiving, you're just falling.

However we have learned how to fly.
 
Ok. Point out where I fear them. I can work with them, shop with them, eat at dining establishments with them, and so forth. As for my partying with them, it was a drug fueled state I was in at the time. They made passes at me. I always let them know I was straight. If one had pressed the issue, I would have cracked his head. Never did any of them press an agenda towards me. They never spoke about the so called injustice of life and society.
As for my point to be proven, yuou have made me outr to be some kind of boogey man because I call myself Christian and will not condone their lifestyle. This is the kind of crap everyone keeps pointing out to you. Outside of sports and music, you are the end all tell all of opinions. No one else's views are correct but your own. You proved it by labeling me as a homophobe. You would probably be more well received if you change your approach. You were willing to discuss this topic, but it didn't make it past 2 replies.
What would be the purpose in telling you about the in justices they face? You wouldn't listen if they told you. Your Christian faith not only chooses not to condone it but it also condemns it. Condemning it indicates a fear of it.
 
What would be the purpose in telling you about the in justices they face? You wouldn't listen if they told you. Your Christian faith not only chooses not to condone it but it also condemns it. Condemning it indicates a fear of it.
Well you sure dont mind telling people. And now you attribute and action for me, or should I say a lack of action. Would I tell them about my faith, absolutely. Of course if they were willing to listen. As for my faith condemning it, so what. You choose not to follow said faith. So why cut everyone down that chooses to? My church teaches to love people into the kingdom of God. We teach Jesus saves people from their sins, not in their sins. We all choose what we want. I don't follow a state or nationally mandated religion. No one is beheaded for not following what we believe. But we do defend our stance from those who try to mold it into a secuilar version. You have tons of misgivings about people of faith. You lump it all in one package as if its all bad. And then sit on a high horse and judge those who dont see it the same way you do. All passive aggressively
 
  • Like
Reactions: nctransplant
The purpose for any species is to procreate? That's it? Wow... that was a lot of wasted time in all those science classes. All of those people studying and conducting experiments.. pfft! Pish-posh! The purpose is to procreate. How about, um... bullshit?

Lack of procreation is also ideal when the "purpose" has gotten out-of-control and is purposing too much.
I don't know what science classes you took in Never/never land but I have a BS Biology as well as a Masters in Biology and the main purpose of living organisms is to pass on their genetics/reproduce.
 
I don't know what science classes you took in Never/never land but I have a BS Biology as well as a Masters in Biology and the main purpose of living organisms is to pass on their genetics/reproduce.
I guess humans just got sidetracked with a bunch of existential hogwash for the past ten thousand years or so.
 
Well you sure dont mind telling people. And now you attribute and action for me, or should I say a lack of action. Would I tell them about my faith, absolutely. Of course if they were willing to listen. As for my faith condemning it, so what. You choose not to follow said faith. So why cut everyone down that chooses to? My church teaches to love people into the kingdom of God. We teach Jesus saves people from their sins, not in their sins. We all choose what we want. I don't follow a state or nationally mandated religion. No one is beheaded for not following what we believe. But we do defend our stance from those who try to mold it into a secuilar version. You have tons of misgivings about people of faith. You lump it all in one package as if its all bad. And then sit on a high horse and judge those who dont see it the same way you do. All passive aggressively
You're absolutely right. I beg you to forgive me.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT