Sure our biggest need is down low but not sure how that would hurt if it were to work out. Basically, it's a back up to not getting Knox and he would slide in to some of those minutes. It would provide Roy with more versatility in lineups.
Do you think Pitt will release him to play in the ACC without him sitting out ?Cameron Johnson scored 24 points against the Tar Heels at the Smith Center earlier this year.
Staff is in contact after Pitt cleared him to talk With ACC Schools. Main remaining barrier is Pitt says he must sit out 1 season if he goes to an ACC school. That is a no-go for him. Says Roy is trying to work with Pitt to overcome that stipulation.
He averaged 11.9 points, 4.5 rebounds and 2.3 assists. His 41.5 percent shooting on three-point put him at fifth in the ACC.
Do you think Pitt will release him to play in the ACC without him sitting out ?
I read he was a RS Soph last year so it said he had 2 years of eligibility left.
There has never been any commitment made that Rush gets an unused scholarship.The reason why it doesn't hurt because of Bradley comes back we still have one scholly left which goes to Rush if unused. If Bradley doesn't we have Rush and another scholly unused.
Just don't expect a starter out of it.
I am pretty sure Rush is a Preferred Walk on.There has never been any commitment made that Rush gets an unused scholarship.
Well excuse me if I like a lot of what I see in our incoming big men
nd excuse me if I am not ready to anoint Tony as the new Tim Duncan,
Beg your pardon if that offends ya but just getting Tony back does not insure we will be a final 4 team,
Excuse me as well if I do not really like his saying he is a stretch 4 that should have been allowed to shoot more treys as a frosh.
"Preferred walk-on" just means that you can be a walk-on without having to try out for the team (any UNC student could attend a try out, if they made the team they would be a "non-preferred walk-on"). In other words Roy recruited him to come be a walk-on. It comes with no guarantee of a scholarship at any time in Rush's case.I am pretty sure Rush is a Preferred Walk on.
Anyone else have knowledge on this because I am relatively sure a preferred walkon is a walkon that gets a scholarship if one becomes available and that Luke Maye was recruited as a preferred Walkon and that a scholarship opened up for him so he got one. And, Roy even says he regretted not offerring him a scholarship from the start."Preferred walk-on" just means that you can be a walk-on without having to try out for the team (any UNC student could attend a try out, if they made the team they would be a "non-preferred walk-on"). In other words Roy recruited him to come be a walk-on. It comes with no guarantee of a scholarship at any time in Rush's case.
Compare this to Luke Maye. Maye was recruited as a guaranteed scholarship player, however at the time of signing Roy was concerned that he may not fit onto the scholarship roster (D1 basketball teams can have a maximum of 13 scholarship players). So Roy asked that, if the spot was needed for someone else, Maye forego his scholarship as a freshman and play without one, and then he was guaranteed to have a scholarship for his sophomore year. Roy did this in case we landed a 5* player. We didn't so Roy gave Maye the scholarship as a freshman. This tactic is similar to how Alabama football will ask a player to "gray-shirt" as a freshman, as they have too many talented scholarship players so there isn't enough room on the scholarship recruit on the roster their freshman season.
The treatment between the two is very different, but many people seem to think they're essentially the same. Roy determined he did not want to offer Shea Rush a scholarship spot at UNC. He could be given one if there is an extra spot, but that is generally given to senior walk-on players. Kanler Coker was given a scholarship last year for his senior year at UNC as a gesture of gratitude for his hard work with the team over the years.
Yes, I already explained Luke's situation. He came on as a "preferred walk-on", which just means he was guaranteed a spot on the team but not a scholarship. However, as I wrote the agreement was very different than most preferred walk-ons for him. Many "preferred walk-ons" never get a scholarship their entire career. Preferred walk-on is a walk-on who was recruited to play for the team by the coach, it's a vague term that encompasses the majority of walk-ons at the D-1 level. It has absolutely zero scholarship guarantees most of the time.Anyone else have knowledge on this because I am relatively sure a preferred walkon is a walkon that gets a scholarship if one becomes available and that Luke Maye was recruited as a preferred Walkon and that a scholarship opened up for him so he got one. And, Roy even says he regretted not offerring him a scholarship from the start.
People in here seem to think he is a post player when he is a 2/3.
Show me where anyone ensured that we'd be a final 4 team? Final Four caliber team, absolutely, but I don't think any rational fan guarantees final 4's in May. Unless you're 2016 Duke fans
A few of us have just noticed that the closer Tony gets to staying in the draft suddenly some fans have all of these negatives to say about his game. The same ones that were praising him all season.
If he goes, he goes. Doesn't make him any less of a player or any less valuable to our 2017 NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP TEAM. Still feels great to say.
Anyone else have knowledge on this because I am relatively sure a preferred walkon is a walkon that gets a scholarship if one becomes available and that Luke Maye was recruited as a preferred Walkon and that a scholarship opened up for him so he got one. And, Roy even says he regretted not offerring him a scholarship from the start.
He is not a big.
I thought he was 6'8 forward? Thats a big to me. But whatever.
Stallings owes roy a favor . . and I believe this kid really wants UNC.
Do you think Pitt will release him to play in the ACC without him sitting out ?
I thought he was 6'8 forward? Thats a big to me. But whatever.
Highly doubtful imo. It benefits them to not play against him. Stallings is alrdy very much under the microscope for buddy connections in regards to his hiring. Letting his top remaining player transfer to a league opponent is pretty silly on paper.Hopefully they will lift the restriction. It really doesn't benefit them in any material way to block him.
I think you're right...I wonder how much pull in the decision Stallings has, or is it all on the AD or whomever else handles that?
Highly doubtful imo. It benefits them to not play against him. Stallings is alrdy very much under the microscope for buddy connections in regards to his hiring. Letting his top remaining player transfer to a league opponent is pretty silly on paper.
I doubt the Pitt AD would go against Stallings' wishes.
If, the young man wants to be a Tar Heel, then let him be one . . he has met his obligation to Pitt U., he wasn't even a recruit of Stallings.
These things have a way of not working out in the player's best interests though... (although Brooks' case did!)
Where is this rumor coming from?Rumor going around that Pitt has agreed to waive the sit out year for Johnson
Poster from another site and the other posters say he has an inside connection.Where is this rumor coming from?