...and sorry, but this wasn't just "one of those nights".
I was gonna wait and let this settle in before I posted anything, but I changed my mind. It ain't gonna get any better 3 hours, 3 days or even 3 weeks from now --- so here it is.
This was as ugly an outing as I have ever seen --- even uglier than the Tennessee game. In fact, it's not an exaggeration to say this was a brand-damaging loss. And this one sticks to EVERYBODY.
First, the players:
- IIRC, last season Bacot talked about how uk had "punked" us the previous season, and thus we went out and showed em what was up. Welp, I got news for ya, guys: Y'all got worse than punked tonight. Y'all got Ned-Beatty-on-a-canoe-trip punked. Just for one example, I've watched Wheeler play live at least a dozen times over the past couple years, and he shouldn't score 26 alone in an damned empty gym. Just push his drives at the proper angle then block his little scoop shots. But ya see, it ain't about any numbers, it's about effort and toughness.
- In general, we should all know that uk will push, shove, undercut and go over your back, and if ya stand around hoping the ref will bail you out, then yeah, you're gonna get punked. You better play with effort, and on Roy's scale of 1-to-Tyler Hansbrough, well, we were in negaitve numbers today. So to our Bigs, I'd just ask, do you think for a second that Psycho, or Kennedy Meeks, or Brice Johnson would let them bully us like that inside??? To our Guards, do you think that little shit Wheeler would even sniff those drives against Joel Berry? Do you Wings think Theo Pinson or Kenny Williams would stand around and let them track every loose ball rebound or run lazily under every screen?
Second, the coaching staff:
- Whether or not anyone wants to hear this, ultimately a "performance" like this also rests squarely on the staff. Pretty much everything I've been complaining and/or warning about in these posts reared their ugly heads. We've been playing a soft brand of basketball and have only sporadically valued sound and vital fundamentals like, say... oh, I dunno, BLOCKING OUT AND REBOUNDING. I would also mention transition, but how the hell are ya supposed to do that without securing the ball on a missed shot? Oh, and how many layups did we give up in transition "defense"? On the other end, we've got Bigs trying to be 3s, and as I warned, our questionable shot-selection becomes rather glaring when they don't go in. And back to fundamentals, our screens are lazy, our "cuts" are slow, and Lord, some of those passes........
- Even assuming max effort, our approach right now is not the best for this roster. This roster is not built for straight Man defense for 40 minutes. It just isn't. And you finally run a half-hearted trap down 30? Yes, I said out loud the words behind the acronym AYFKM??? And speaking of the roster, those here who have complained about the early short rotation, it is a valid point, and one that shows itself when you're looking for someone off the bench to step into the fire.
Finally, while I fully understand the rationale for Hubert's approach in general, all I can to him is --- as in poker --- "scared money" is "dead money". I've been Hubert's biggest advocate and we have a bench full of UNC legacy on this staff, which should be a good thing. Frankly, at this point, it's coming up short. So to the guys on the staff, meet me at Camera 3: You have in your collective memory banks the archives of Roy Williams and the guy who invented most of the modern game, Dean E. Smith. In other words, STOP TRYING TO RE-INVENT THE WHEEL. And now would be a good time to heed that.
Welp... that's all I've got that's fit to print...