Not true at all, seeing as Clemson is in fact a new team at the top the past couple years. Similarly, TCU, Baylor, Oregon, Michigan State have all made NY6 Bowls in recent years. None of those schools qualify as "blue bloods."
Says the not-so-closet Bama fan. His point is absolutely true. The college football season typically ends with the same very small group of national title contenders every year. Alabama, Ohio State, Oklahoma, Florida State, Oregon, Clemson (who has finished in the top 10 four of the last five years).
Before that, lemme know where they finished, and that is my point. Clemson is a direct disproof of his claim that the same programs always compete for a title. Clemson was not competing for titles 5 years ago for a long, long stretch of time (1981.)
You're missing THE point, which is how unlikely it is for any non-blue blood to ever win a championship in college football. Clemson is possibly an exception depending on how you define blue blood, any maybe Auburn too. But otherwise you have to go back to 1990 to find a team from outside the usual powerhouses to win a title.
Yeah those teams rose up, but look at the last 10-15 national champs. Same ol. Since you are a bama fan, I'm sure that's cool for you.
I knew you would disagree, but you're an NFL guy, so I totally get it. You could watch any NFL game just like I can watch any college game. I'm watching USF - Illinois right now and it's an UGLY game, but I have no intention of changing the channel. I watch very little NFL each week. Usually I'll catch some of one of the prime time games a week.
Yeah, I don't give two shits about that crap either. Just produce on the field, and stop worrying about making yourself a freaking global icon, or whatever the hell they're trying to do.
And Run CMC was wide open on 3rd down. I'll get the gun.
Yep, they should.
And to Tyrod Taylor, to make matters even worse for UNC fans. Screw that guy.
