ADVERTISEMENT

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

B. Ccc. H

Why... does he put that orange shit all over his face??? It's almost starting to look like he's in a minstrel show, circa 1897.
He’s changed shades I’ve noticed. More bronze than orange. I don’t understand why someone in his circle doesn’t say “hey man rub some of that shit on your ears and neck too”. But he’d prob deny he puts any on.

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

B. Ccc. H
Trump seemed barely awake today in Kinston and called out a Pennsylvania Senatye hopeful Dave McCormick . . . while in North Carolina.
🤣
It's bedtime, Donnie. Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz . . .

Login to view embedded media
Why... does he put that orange shit all over his face??? It's almost starting to look like he's in a minstrel show, circa 1897.

Preseason Rankings: AP vs Pomeroy

Nonsense.

For the same reason that an informed person could beat a random list most of the time - by knowing enough good teams and putting them on top - an informed person could also create a list that would lose to a random list most of the time - by putting those known good teams on the bottom.

So, no, "ANY list that isn't random" can NOT be counted on to outperform a random list.

You've already agreed - albeit kicking and screaming the contrary - that Pomeroy is better than random. So the next question would logically be "how much better?"
Apparently you are no better at reading than you are at math. As I clearly and correctly stated above, OTHER than the ASTRONOMICALLY unlikely outliers of random arrays getting things anywhere close to right, any ranking by anyone familiar with college basketball will be better than random. If you want an idea of the crazy odds at those outliers hitting even close, with 364 teams the denominator in the damn fraction is 364 Factorial (!). If you don't know what that means, look it up.
*spoiler alert: the actual number will be 776 digits long (with no decimal points).

If this helps your visualization, the odds of a random ranking so much as placing all of the eventual Top-25 teams just somewhere in the top 182 (upper half) is:
1 out of 2-to-the-25th-power = 1 / 33,554,432.
In stark and demonstrative contrast, literally EVERYONE on this board will get at least that much right (barring a really weird outlier cinderella team emerging).

So... one last time, your premise is meaningless. Sorry if that hurts your feelings, but it is what it is.
And for the record, I didn't "come around" to anything. You can spout that disingenuous crap all you want but it doesn't mitigate the speciousness behind your obsessive arguing.

I also clearly stated I have neither the desire nor patience to deal any further with your stubborn unwillingness to learn, yet I just tried one last time. But, do not EVER tell me I'm posting "nonsense". I've done nothing more than state mathematical facts and left the "kicking and screaming" to you.

We're done here, so do NOT reply to this unless you finally "get it" --- you won't like what comes back.

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

No amount of proof will work or change them. They have to have their own a-ha moment. I'll admit that I didn't see the wearing trash bags and embracing the garbage label thing coming. When you don't see the truth in the irony there... I don't think there's any hope for you.

It makes perfect sense, once you realize how much of a simpleton they need to be too believe anything this moron says.

He's only a "thing" because people like @bluetoe think it's "smart" to be in a cult.

Login to view embedded media

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

I hear you. Who keeps track of how much airtime the candidates are receiving anyway? And what's more, maybe we should also have some rules about the frequency of lies a candidate tells over the public airwaves.

It's funny how three days before the election the garbage is bitching and moaning about Kamala being invited to appear on SNL while Trump wasn't.
Probably because he has no sense of humor about himself. He doesn't really have a sense of humor at all. He jokingly denigrates and insults...but, I've never seen him actually laugh.

No WAY would he be in a skit where he allows JAJ mock him to his face.

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

You're missing the value of the Ignore button.

I ignore people for the reasons I mentioned. But when I view a thread, I go to the bottom and click the button to "show ignored."

If you are tempted to ask "then what's the point of ignoring them," it's really very straightforward. The ignore feature acts as a flag (it shows "You are ignoring content by this member" in a gray banner next to their name).

You may also be thinking "I don't need any daggum flag to tell me who the idiots and racists are" then great. More power to you. But I'm old, and don't spend all my days here, so I can use the help. Plus, on the Iowa board some posters change their handles as often as they change clothes or gender identities, so I definitely need the help over there.
It's a copout to ME... no one else was meant to be included in that statement. I understand why people do it.

OOTB's Political Thread . ..

Wait. There's still an equal time rule? Who knew?

This is a clear problem area. What counts as press? What counts as advertising?

I've seen estimates that Musk has given Trump the equivalent of million$ in free advertising on X. Not counting the "interview".

How about the Rogan-Trump event?

How about Jon Stewart's routines?
Yeah... Reagan's FCC overturned the Fairness Doctrine 35 years ago or more.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT