joeydavid said:

Here's a clue. It rhymes with "Because he frost".

Click to expand...

This guy has TDS so bad he replies to his own posts.

joeydavid said:

Why did trump claim the Iowa caucus was rigged?

Click to expand...

Here's a clue. It rhymes with "Because he frost".

bluetoe said:

Jesus Christ you incredibly dumb gasbag, take a hint. Do you even know what 'substantiate' means? It's so ironic that you picked on someone's supposed lack of education.

Click to expand...

Why did trump claim the Iowa caucus was rigged?

joeydavid said:

What would you like me to say about you being a gullible fool?

Click to expand...

Jesus Christ you incredibly dumb gasbag, take a hint. Do you even know what 'substantiate' means? It's so ironic that you picked on someone's supposed lack of education.

gary-7 said:

Good question. They have practiced traps and Zone. If/when we see them remains to be seen...

Click to expand...

Yeah, Gary, I want to see a bit more on the defensive end. Nothing drive me more bonkers is than to see opposing teams walk the ball up court on us, I am about putting game pressure on the opposing teams in every aspect, I want to force them to do what I want them to do rather than they be allowed to set the tone, throw the punch rather than take it and when you do make it a knock out blow.

I am not talking about a constant full court hard press but I do want my PG playing at least token pressure so their PG has to be concerned with a defender rather than thinking about the attack he wants to set up while he takes a casual Sunday afternoon stroll up court. I want that pressure to be like Seth's dribble, constant variation from token pressure to moderate (not risk a foul but increase the heat), to hard challenge of the inbound pass, to hard full court pressure with 3/4 traps set to funnel to the side line out of bounds, change it up. Throw the fast ball but throw the change up and the curve that make the fast ball look even faster. This speeds up the other team both physically and mentally and the body withers physically in he face of that kind of constant game pressure.

That kind of game pressure can neutralize the length advantage that teams like Kansas and duke will have on us and we all know what happens when the opposing team get physically and mentally worn down. They foul, they are not as quick to close out, they resort to more jumpers, they play their bench more than they want to, they are able to be beaten back down court (just to name a few).

strummingram said:

Login to view embedded media
America: It was fun, sometimes, while it lasted.

Click to expand...

was that Ted Koppel? I really miss that guy. IMO the most neutral and trustworthy journalist when he was active in MSM. I don't know about now, I haven't seen him in many many years. I would sure love to see him around though.

Here's trump admitting he's paying for "red wave" polls. A few of less educated posters here tried to dispute this a weeks ago.

Login to view embedded media

bluetoe said:

and of course you have shown absolutely nothing to substantiate your opinion. That's because 1) you can't, and because 2) you're just a gasbag to begin with.

Click to expand...

What would you like me to say about you being a gullible fool?

DSouthr said:

That number may increase to 10 useful parts when Claude becomes "able" to play. I saw his play in our blue white scrimmage with what looked to me like a good bit of physicality, more than I expected, I feel like I really under estimated him based on that.

Click to expand...

It will for sure. They are working on it.

joeydavid said:

Don't take this the wrong way but that's some of the dumbest nonsensical dribble you have posted. Good grief, does the cult run deep in you.

Click to expand...

and of course you have shown absolutely nothing to substantiate your opinion. That's because 1) you can't, and because 2) you're just a gasbag to begin with.

Login to view embedded media
America: It was fun, sometimes, while it lasted.

UNCHUSKER said:

You sound like a total Pussy

Click to expand...

Eeeeasy husker.

Hark_The_Sound_2010 said:

I've never seen a comedian's jokes get an entire political party so shook before, lol. No wonder y'all can't meme.

Click to expand...

It's entirely possible that the exaggeration required for something to be universally funny... was simply not achieved. Sometimes, every once in a while, cancer patients don't laugh at cancer jokes at a cancer fundraiser.

Somehow, DJT managed to lose Geraldo Rivera. I guess he finally said "Ya know, maybe Trump is too much of an asshole." That's no minimal feat given the level of BS that Geraldo can churn-out!

Bullies are the minority.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

bluetoe said:

no proof at all, just an indication of two things; one is that thanks to Trump and his vehement protest over the validity of the last prez election, election officials are NOW going to be on their toes looking for these fraudulent activities and two, that such activities were widespread in the last election just as I have been pointing out.

In that last election that was touted as being the fairest ever executed, the legitimacy of ballots was tested at the point of vote-count and not the point of application for and filling out of absentee ballots.

Click to expand...

Don't take this the wrong way but that's some of the dumbest nonsensical dribble you have posted. Good grief, does the cult run deep in you.

Heels Noir said:

Of course it has happened before in small, isolated cases. It's certainly nothing that has been a "widespread" issue that has had any significant effect on the outcome of an election. For four years you've been singing the same tune about there being enough "circumstantial evidence" to show the election was bogus. There is absolutely no proof of this, just your mindless, biased opinion.

Click to expand...

it's my opinion and not proven fact, as I have always maintained. My claim has always been that the election as conducted was bogus, meaning it was highly questionable. My post above echoes that conclusion and it's based only on what is observable combined with some reason and common sense; things that you possess in small quantity and use in in even smaller ones..

I've never seen a comedian's jokes get an entire political party so shook before, lol. No wonder y'all can't meme.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

UNCHUSKER said:

You sound like a total Pussy

Click to expand...

Been on the board for 24yrs and this is your 40th post??? Yeah, seems legit.

This is premium content. Please subscribe to view.

Heels Noir said:

You're full of it. The only thing Trump's accusations of cheating over the past four years has accomplished is distrust in the system and a whole lot of baseless conspiracy theories. There was no "widespread fraudulent activities" in the last election but rather just a bunch of bitterness and grumbling from sore losers like yourself.

Click to expand...

oh, well why didn't you say so before? Why wait until now to be completely full of shit? Oh never mind, I just remembered you've always been full of shit.

To claim that what is being reported on here hasn't happened before is not just dishonst but really stupid. Of course it happened in that last prez election, the only question being to what extent. My logical claim is that the sheer number of votes, combined with the knowledge that the election as conducted lent itself to these sorts of activities, is circumstantial evidence enough that the election was guilty of being bogus.


eta...and by the way, genius, distrust is not suddenly some negative aspect of a loser. Distrust is why the very safeguards you morons use to claim the last election was fair, were put into place. Of course there is distrust in the activities and institutions that shape our environment, and it's a healthy consideration, and a distinctly American one. But if it's only a consideration not acted upon, therein lies the failure. Thank you Trump, for elevating the level of distrust enough that it is finally being properly acted upon, and serving to establish some justifiable trust in our systems.

DaveChapelle said:

Login to view embedded media

Click to expand...

typically misleading garbage. The only thing approaching racism was the first guy, and even he can't be shown to be actually racist although I found his comments as presented to be offensive and over-the-top in pointing out whatever it was he was trying to say. What was he trying to say? Who, knows, his remarks were as usual taken out of context. For all I know, he was joking or being sarcastic in making a point counter to what his truncated remarks seem to indicate. You can't keep up with all the ways the leftists have of deceiving, so it's wise to be skeptical...

A typical libdem tactic; if what you're criticizing happens to be of some persuasion other than white, you're a racist. And calling Hillary a POS was thrown in gratis. No one can be called racist for simply being aware of what Hillary Clinton is. Hell, she lost to Donald Trump, the candidate who was given no chance whatsoever to be elected. According to libdem philosophy, you would have to be a real POS to do that.

Heels Noir said:

This is just more proof of how secure our elections are. Notice that the cheating was discovered before the election, not after.

Click to expand...

Which means you can obviously extrapolate that to all areas and we can all be sure that this incident is the only place in America where it's happening! Phew. I was nervous.