OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- By pooponduke
- Out of the Blue
- 69136 Replies
But it's not spam if it fits his agenda. Except he doesn't have one according to his question.Better tell @joeydavid !
But it's not spam if it fits his agenda. Except he doesn't have one according to his question.Better tell @joeydavid !
Better tell @joeydavid !You said with your own bolding "Is this TRUE? Shocking if it is."
Simply comparing the pics shows 2 states require PHOTO voter ID - NH, Rhode Island. Then 3 others, Virginia, Connecticut, Delaware, require non-photo ID.
Thanks for fact-checking yourself though, maybe try that next time before you post it? The internet is full of BS like this.
You said with your own bolding "Is this TRUE? Shocking if it is."This isn't the terrible joke thread my man.
Is that @joeydavid ?In light of the Elon game having started the bb season and the big show down with Kansas coming up, I thought I'd post this one since it's got a nice Carolina related twist. Side note, she's got quite the collection of stuffed animals going there. Sound on.
Login to view embedded media
True. Lot's of celebrating to do then.This thread has been pretty dead over the last yr. I think it could pick back up once Trump makes it to Jan 20.
This isn't the terrible joke thread my man.What agenda
Me too. And I like to argue, but arguing with myself is never a fun endeavor. I always win and lose.Kinda disappointed in this thread since the election. Was expecting a lot better from you guys, but both performances have been pretty weak.
This thread has been pretty dead over the last yr. I think it could pick back up once Trump makes it to Jan 20.Kinda disappointed in this thread since the election. Was expecting a lot better from you guys, but both performances have been pretty weak.
What agenda, that you don't easily fall for misinfo? That you look at both maps for the two states not supporting the claim?I didn't "fall" for anything, it's why I asked, numbnuts. But I don't understand what "Looks a few times" means? (and specific note: as if this space has never been flooded with spam - guess it's not spam if it supports your agenda).
Nice move of the goalposts. The issue was "getting over it" and "moving on" which are a completely different issue. We never even get to those things if something never happened. Whether something happened or didn't would be irrelevant as conceptually we are either allowed to talk about the past or we aren't.Civil war actually happened.
Fraud didn't. Paper recounts (often multiple, and often done by RED SoS) proved there was no mass fraud. It's a fabrication that you fell for.
I didn't "fall" for anything, it's why I asked, numbnuts. But I don't understand what "Looks a few times" means? (and specific note: as if this space has never been flooded with spam - guess it's not spam if it supports your agenda).It is wrong. Looks a few times. Thanks for the spam.
If you fall for this, then no wonder...
Civil war actually happened.
Fraud didn't. Paper recounts (often multiple, and often done by RED SoS) proved there was no mass fraud. It's a fabrication that you fell for.
It is wrong. Looks a few times. Thanks for the spam.Is this TRUE? Shocking if it is. At least as it generalizes how people think in particular locales.
Login to view embedded media
Civil war actually happened.And the irony of this is thicker than cement. Again, I'll concede any discussion about the prior election can wait (although there are some very, very interesting observations to be made in comparing some things/trends). But you never stop arguing over an event that ended 159 years ago and you want to tell @bluetoe to move on. That's some funny stuff.
I thought today would be a good day for some music to soothe the souls. The first one is for our Libs, the second is for us conservatives.
Login to view embedded media Login to view embedded media
Agree with this and don't understand why @blazers makes the pitch of Hispanics benefiting more from progressive policies. First, everyone benefits short term from any type of gift from someone else, but long term no one benefits from this when the entity doing the "giving" doesn't have anything to actually give. Hispanics are no different from anyone else and this class/categorical distinction stuff is a big part of the problem. Everyone benefits from policies that allows them to work hard and thrive. And from my perspective on Hispanics, all they want is the opportunity to do just that, like most Americans.That's debatable. What isn't debatable is that Hispanics, as a whole, are more conservative on social issues. That would put them more in line with the GOP.