I'm not dodging anything. I'm being very succinct. It doesn't suggest anything to me. It says, quite clearly, that people who read ancient manuscripts, and act and interpret them as if they were dictated by the entity they call God, are likely to have very interesting results. If someone is believing they're in contact with a dead person and getting up-to-the-moment bulletins on how best to kill people today? Also nuttier than Chinese chicken salad.
The noticeable difference here is, Ben Carson believes in a creation of the universe in seven 24-hour periods, and Hillary Clinton talking to Eleanor Roosevelt through a clairvoyant medium is a bunch of crap you're making up because...as usual... you're driven by allegiance to your own partisan and religious rhetoric. If she did do that, then it's one more nutty cookie in her box. Hillary Clinton is just as dangerous, for different reasons. You'll pick far-fetched reasons over the real reasons because you actually subscribe to many of the religious beliefs as Carson! Clinton is not a political unknown as Carson.
So once again, you falsely smear someone for just speaking the truth. Hillary herself said she was doing this, publicly I might add. But you can't take the time to check on that before calling me a liar.
Typical.
Fact is what a president believes about ancient history has almost no relevance whereas consulting with the dead about CURRENT policy does indeed indicate a possible serious problem. Your comments on Carson thus just come off as bigotry.