ADVERTISEMENT

Carson Steps In It...

I'm not dodging anything. I'm being very succinct. It doesn't suggest anything to me. It says, quite clearly, that people who read ancient manuscripts, and act and interpret them as if they were dictated by the entity they call God, are likely to have very interesting results. If someone is believing they're in contact with a dead person and getting up-to-the-moment bulletins on how best to kill people today? Also nuttier than Chinese chicken salad.

The noticeable difference here is, Ben Carson believes in a creation of the universe in seven 24-hour periods, and Hillary Clinton talking to Eleanor Roosevelt through a clairvoyant medium is a bunch of crap you're making up because...as usual... you're driven by allegiance to your own partisan and religious rhetoric. If she did do that, then it's one more nutty cookie in her box. Hillary Clinton is just as dangerous, for different reasons. You'll pick far-fetched reasons over the real reasons because you actually subscribe to many of the religious beliefs as Carson! Clinton is not a political unknown as Carson.

So once again, you falsely smear someone for just speaking the truth. Hillary herself said she was doing this, publicly I might add. But you can't take the time to check on that before calling me a liar.

Typical.

Fact is what a president believes about ancient history has almost no relevance whereas consulting with the dead about CURRENT policy does indeed indicate a possible serious problem. Your comments on Carson thus just come off as bigotry.
 
So once again, you falsely smear someone for just speaking the truth. Hillary herself said she was doing this, publicly I might add. But you can't take the time to check on that before calling me a liar.

Typical.

Fact is what a president believes about ancient history has almost no relevance whereas consulting with the dead about CURRENT policy does indeed indicate a possible serious problem. Your comments on Carson thus just come off as bigotry.
I said, again quite clearly, "if she IS doing this, then she's nuttier than Chinese chicken salad."

Now, I'm a bigot. If you see me as a bigot, I'm doing fine.
 
I said, again quite clearly, "if she IS doing this, then she's nuttier than Chinese chicken salad."

Now, I'm a bigot. If you see me as a bigot, I'm doing fine.

Yes but you spent God knows how many hours trying to find some source that proves your position on Carson, yet spend not two seconds on Hillary.

Why is Hillary not worth the effort but Carson is?
 
Yes but you spent God knows how many hours trying to find some source that proves your position on Carson, yet spend not two seconds on Hillary.

Why is Hillary not worth the effort but Carson is?
I guess because the thread was about Ben Carson, not Hillary Clinton.

Hillary Clinton is openly in-bed with TBTF banks, she even likes to proclaim how she was a Wall Street attorney. She is a Goldman-Sachs flunkie. She's an Oligarch's wet dream. Not to mention an active CFR member.

And, it's not that Carson is "worth the effort" but, as I said, if it were between the two of them, and I had gun to my head and had to choose one or the other... Carson is safer than she is. I even doubt that Carson's belief that the Earth was created in seven 24-hour cycles would be as dangerous as being in Goldman-Sachs' pocket.
 
The hillary-ous thing about all this is Clinton has already locked up 359 super-delegates... What happens to DEMs when she's indicted for gross negligence in handling classified information, providing false and misleading statements to FBI investigators, and abuse of power in using here position as Sec of State in promoting the Clinton Foundation and the Clinton Global Initiative...
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT