ADVERTISEMENT

Coronavirus

I feel sorry for the people who believed the hype and injected who knows what. But it’s whatever. I don’t care what you people choose to put in your body whether it be vaccines, fentanyl or dick, which I suppose at least one here takes all 3 regularly. I’m looking at you @Heels Noir , err, @Heels Orange.
 
I feel sorry for the people who believed the hype and injected who knows what. But it’s whatever. I don’t care what you people choose to put in your body whether it be vaccines, fentanyl or dick, which I suppose at least one here takes all 3 regularly. I’m looking at you @Heels Noir , err, @Heels Orange.
That’s a good one. Absolutely hilarious. If it’s not on your mind it’s in your mouth.
 
Last edited:
Does your wife know you’re gay?
messed up fox GIF by The Last Man On Earth
 
By contrast, I don't know of anyone (personally, or through people who know people that I know) that had any adverse reaction- certainly nothing extreme- at all to any of the vaccines. Only what I have seen/heard through social media or online. Eric Clapton, for example.
Maybe your lib friends are afraid to tell you what happened?
 
I don't know if I would get more. I don't work for a company that requires it, so I don't have to bother with that.

I don't think this came from a bat in a wet market, anymore. I think it was engineered and probably had GOF intentions or objectives. I can't prove that, and I don't spend a lot of time thinking or worrying about it. I have no way of ever knowing for sure.
Glad to see you at least are beginning to recognize you were lied to as far as this not being engineered.

But ask yourself a very basic question. What the heck was the US government, Fauci and Collins in particular, doing in funding lab research in China to manufacture potentially pandemic causing viruses, which seems to have led to the Covid outbreak?

I'll answer for you. Covid is the little bioweapon. The so-called vaccines are the big one.
 
Getting the vaccine doesn't mean you won't GET the virus.

If you've been vaccinated, and it was effective, you've probably "had" Covid-19 several times. You simply didn't get very ill and your immune system killed it. You may have never knew you had it at all, consciously. But, you technically had it... often.
Yeah, but the CDC, Biden and the rest swore it would and only the bad unvaxxed spread it. They were lying, and the truth is the vaccine doesn't actually protect you from death and more serious illness. That's a lie as well, but you haven't yet realized it.
 
I don't think this came from a bat in a wet market, anymore. I think it was engineered and probably had GOF intentions or objectives. I can't prove that, and I don't spend a lot of time thinking or worrying about it. I have no way of ever knowing for sure.
Lots of scientists didn't think they'd ever figure out the origin, but some huge conclusions have been found this summer.

 
Lots of scientists didn't think they'd ever figure out the origin, but some huge conclusions have been found this summer.

If what I understand the claim here is from my brief scan, the virus emerged from the market and not the lab. Assuming this is true, statistically speaking, this has to be the all-time, G.O.A.T. level, of coincidences that this happened just up the road from the lab that Ouchi was funding doing gain of function research for exactly this type of event. I'm not gonna read all of it, the underlying papers, etc. and wouldn't understand most of it if I did probably, but you'll have to forgive me if I remain skeptical. How do we trust any of this in light of the involvement of the Chinese and the number of times we have been lied to by both the "science" and the politicians?
 
^ that is a long Twitter thread y one of the researchers discussing the findings
We'll never know what happened. And, given today's lack of trust of anything, it wouldn't matter who, what or where it was officially declared as the origin. There would and will always be those who refuse to believe it. Tom Swift and his electronic paranoid machine...randman1... are a prime example.
 
Lots of scientists didn't think they'd ever figure out the origin, but some huge conclusions have been found this summer.

not buying it. Not ruling it out but not accepting it either.

To begin with, conclusions are drawn, not found, blaze. It isn't discovery, it's analysis. By humans. Just saying.

The market can be the epicenter of the spread of the virus but not necessarily be the origin. While they point to the radiating number of first cases away from the market as evidence of that location being the epicenter, they don't mention (AFAIK) that the reverse is true...people would go TO the market is a similar pattern, any of whom may have been infected. I admit I didn't read everything cause I called bullshit at that point.
 
We'll never know what happened. And, given today's lack of trust of anything, it wouldn't matter who, what or where it was officially declared as the origin. There would and will always be those who refuse to believe it. Tom Swift and his electronic paranoid machine...randman1... are a prime example.
Well, now that they've got all those boxes of documents back from Mar-a-Lago, I think we'll find that hidden next to the nuclear code secrets was a folder that clearly shows that the orangeman
personally created and spread the virus. Just wait for next season's premiere of the J6 hearings for the dramatic testimony coming to a primetime msm channel near you.
 
We'll never know what happened. And, given today's lack of trust of anything, it wouldn't matter who, what or where it was officially declared as the origin. There would and will always be those who refuse to believe it. Tom Swift and his electronic paranoid machine...randman1... are a prime example.
Oh, my expectations of people are close to rock bottom. But if people DO want to read latest scientific consensus they can.
 
We'll never know what happened. And, given today's lack of trust of anything, it wouldn't matter who, what or where it was officially declared as the origin. There would and will always be those who refuse to believe it. Tom Swift and his electronic paranoid machine...randman1... are a prime example.

Believe half of what you see and none of what you hear.
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe
Beijing Biden or rather the cabal that put him in power is emasculating and disarming the US military, most likely to prepare and assist America's defeat in any upcoming war with China.

Same reason for handing over 85 billion in weapons to the Taliban.

One reason for helping China in it's bioweapons facilities like Wuhan.

Americans don't think we can have war here on the homeland without even realizing it started already with Covid and the vaccines.

" More and more reports are surfacing of the U.S. military “demilitarizing” active duty units — stripping them of their weapons to send to Ukraine. One suspects big handouts to the defense military-industrial complex will soon be on the way — but with the collapse of manufacturing expertise, is the U.S. still capable of making these weapons at scale?"

 
Beijing Biden or rather the cabal that put him in power is emasculating and disarming the US military, most likely to prepare and assist America's defeat in any upcoming war with China.

Same reason for handing over 85 billion in weapons to the Taliban.

One reason for helping China in it's bioweapons facilities like Wuhan.

Americans don't think we can have war here on the homeland without even realizing it started already with Covid and the vaccines.

" More and more reports are surfacing of the U.S. military “demilitarizing” active duty units — stripping them of their weapons to send to Ukraine. One suspects big handouts to the defense military-industrial complex will soon be on the way — but with the collapse of manufacturing expertise, is the U.S. still capable of making these weapons at scale?"

At least you reveal the sources of your paranoia. Everything you share is from the most radically-biased sources, and are all total propaganda. It explains the depth of your... obsession.

Do you still have everything you hoarded for Y2K?
 
Tomato Flu... on the way

this is nothing to be overly concerned with here in the South. A liberal application of Duke's mayonnaise and some salt and pepper kills the tomato flue.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Grayhead
At least you reveal the sources of your paranoia. Everything you share is from the most radically-biased sources, and are all total propaganda. It explains the depth of your... obsession.

Do you still have everything you hoarded for Y2K?
Radical sources? Just soldiers in the field all over the world talking about how they are being ordered to hand over their active duty weapons and ammo to be sent to Ukraine.
 
Radical sources? Just soldiers in the field all over the world talking about how they are being ordered to hand over their active duty weapons and ammo to be sent to Ukraine.
You and I both know that’s a lie…..
 
Radical sources? Just soldiers in the field all over the world talking about how they are being ordered to hand over their active duty weapons and ammo to be sent to Ukraine.
Yes, radical, blatant propaganda. They all have a blatantly obvious agenda.

Do you still have all the supplies you hoarded for y2k?
 
Wasn’t one of the first people infected the wife of a lab tech that worked there? I think I remember reading that at one point
 
NIH lists horse de-wormer as possible Covid treatment.

It'll be interesting to see if this is just another attempt to make effective Covid treatments unavailable or perhaps a pivot to cover their backsides for helping to kill millions of people.

 
NIH lists horse de-wormer as possible Covid treatment.

It'll be interesting to see if this is just another attempt to make effective Covid treatments unavailable or perhaps a pivot to cover their backsides for helping to kill millions of people.

To be fair, that's not what it actually says. The page you linked states:

"Antiviral Therapy
These sections summarize the data on ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, remdesivir, and other antiviral medications."

Then:

"Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that is being evaluated to treat COVID-19."

When you click on the page and read the full write-up on ivermectin, it concludes with this recommendation:

"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Thus, NIH is not listing it as a possible treatment, but that it is being evaluated and recommends against using it at this time except for official trials. I'm as distrustful of our government agencies as anyone, but it doesn't help to misstate things either.
 
To be fair, that's not what it actually says. The page you linked states:

"Antiviral Therapy
These sections summarize the data on ritonavir-boosted nirmatrelvir, remdesivir, and other antiviral medications."

Then:

"Ivermectin is an antiparasitic drug that is being evaluated to treat COVID-19."

When you click on the page and read the full write-up on ivermectin, it concludes with this recommendation:

"The Panel recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials."

Thus, NIH is not listing it as a possible treatment, but that it is being evaluated and recommends against using it at this time except for official trials. I'm as distrustful of our government agencies as anyone, but it doesn't help to misstate things either.
Clinical trials means a possible treatment.

And of course, as I said, the question is whether they want to try to keep this effective treatment off the market or perhaps want to cover their backsides considering they helped murder millions of people.
 
ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT