ADVERTISEMENT

Coronavirus

i don't get what the confusion is. the Dutch govt is basically saying that those under 50 without contributing health factors are better off dealing with corona not getting the vaccine. hindsight is 20/20 but this is basically what a lot of people that were considered nuts were advocating for this age group.

how will play out--who knows but it definitely gives credence to those that were saying the vaccine may not be the best course of treatment for those under 50 without underlying health conditions.
Well, it's a couple of things. First, the "Dutch" are from the Netherlands. People from Denmark, which is the country/government who issued the new covid guidance referenced in the thread, are known as Danish or Danes.

Second, there is the debate of referencing the guidance as something being made "illegal" versus a recommendation. I believe those are the two sources of debate and what the "bet" was over. If you've read posts from the respective posters, you can easily figure out who was taking what position and who should be getting a new avatar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heelmanwilm
i don't get what the confusion is. the Dutch govt is basically saying that those under 50 without contributing health factors are better off dealing with corona not getting the vaccine. hindsight is 20/20 but this is basically what a lot of people that were considered nuts were advocating for this age group.

how will play out--who knows but it definitely gives credence to those that were saying the vaccine may not be the best course of treatment for those under 50 without underlying health conditions.
"

Why are people aged under 50 not to be re-vaccinated?​

The purpose of the vaccination programme is to prevent severe illness, hospitalisation and death. Therefore, people at the highest risk of becoming severely ill will be offered booster vaccination. The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with covid-19, and people aged under 50 are therefore currently not being offered booster vaccination."

Those under 50 without special conditions are not eligible to receive the new vax/boosters; hence that makes them illegal for those under 50 minus some small, rare exceptions.

 
"
After receiving the shot, Goldman’s follow-up CT scan showed something odd. In only a few days, the cancer had grown so fast that lights were showing up all over Goldman’s scan.

“It looked like someone had set off fireworks inside Michel’s body,” The Atlantic reported."

Well, duh. I am just a layman but could explain how and why the jabs are causing rapid growing cancers, especially reactivating cancer and sending it into uber-turbo mode.

 
Well, it's a couple of things. First, the "Dutch" are from the Netherlands. People from Denmark, which is the country/government who issued the new covid guidance referenced in the thread, are known as Danish or Danes.

Second, there is the debate of referencing the guidance as something being made "illegal" versus a recommendation. I believe those are the two sources of debate and what the "bet" was over. If you've read posts from the respective posters, you can easily figure out who was taking what position and who should be getting a new avatar.
Nailed it
 
Welched on an avatar bet? Oh, the horror.
I won actually except we didn't bet since the avatar thing was stupid, imo.

Offered a real money bet but he turned it down. Doesn't matter. The "bet" from him was a rhetorical trick.

In their system, when they say the vax will not be offered to nearly everyone under 50, that's the same as making it illegal for those under 50 minus some specifically stated exceptions.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: heelmanwilm
I won actually except we didn't bet since the avatar thing was stupid, imo.

Offered a real money bet but he turned it down. Doesn't matter. The "bet" from him was a rhetorical trick.

In their system, when they say the vax will not be offered to nearly everyone under 50, that's the same as making it illegal for those under 50 minus some specifically stated exceptions.
You MAGA’s don’t have a very good track record for paying your debts….
 
  • Like
Reactions: bluetoe
not too surprised. obama won the Nobel Peace Prize just for being black, and increased his net worth 40 fold as Michelle helped him complain about the America that she was so ashamed of for being so inequitable. Give me some of that inequity.
 
I won actually except we didn't bet since the avatar thing was stupid, imo.

Offered a real money bet but he turned it down. Doesn't matter. The "bet" from him was a rhetorical trick.

In their system, when they say the vax will not be offered to nearly everyone under 50, that's the same as making it illegal for those under 50 minus some specifically stated exceptions.
Actually you lost the bet on two fronts. You claimed it was the Dutch who made it illegal then posted some mind numbingly idiotic pile of shit off a qanon circle jerk site about Denmark. Well the Dutch aren’t from Denmark dumass. So you lose on that alone. But Then when confronted with the danish govt press release and their website on the booster which makes ABSOLUTELY NO reference to it being banned or illegal as you claimed you tried to bring this lame fuk argument that “not being offered is the same as being illegal” which is so stupid, so idiotic, so blatantly pathetic an attempt to twist your lie that it defies words. You lost dipshyt and you refuse to pay. What a fuking lying pusssy. Lmao. But it’s okay numbnuts. Anyone objective sees you made a fool of yourself. I’ll take that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: strummingram
Actually you lost the bet on two fronts. You claimed it was the Dutch who made it illegal then posted some mind numbingly idiotic pile of shit off a qanon circle jerk site about Denmark. Well the Dutch aren’t from Denmark dumass. So you lose on that alone. But Then when confronted with the danish govt press release and their website on the booster which makes ABSOLUTELY NO reference to it being banned or illegal as you claimed you tried to bring this lame fuk argument that “not being offered is the same as being illegal” which is so stupid, so idiotic, so blatantly pathetic an attempt to twist your lie that it defies words. You lost dipshyt and you refuse to pay. What a fuking lying pusssy. Lmao. But it’s okay numbnuts. Anyone objective sees you made a fool of yourself. I’ll take that.
Bull-crap. Bottom line is the link I shared and following links clearly showed how they had banned the vaccine for those under 50 with some very small exceptions.

You were wrong and a liar.

I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes is a moot point regarding the substance of the post and the overriding point on how miserably ineffective the vaccines are and how dangerous.

There is a reason we see so many otherwise young and healthy people dropping like flies from things like heart disease, which is not common for healthy, young people, and it's buttholes like yourself that enabled such widespread slaughter of these innocent people, all so you can slavishly repeat what your thought masters in the media and democrat party, but hey, that's redundant, could just say what your party tells you to think.

And you dutifully obey like some sort of mindless automaton, nary a shred of reason and logic in your head and a seeming gross lack of human decency and compassion.
 
Bull-crap. Bottom line is the link I shared and following links clearly showed how they had banned the vaccine for those under 50 with some very small exceptions.

You were wrong and a liar.

I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes is a moot point regarding the substance of the post and the overriding point on how miserably ineffective the vaccines are and how dangerous.

There is a reason we see so many otherwise young and healthy people dropping like flies from things like heart disease, which is not common for healthy, young people, and it's buttholes like yourself that enabled such widespread slaughter of these innocent people, all so you can slavishly repeat what your thought masters in the media and democrat party, but hey, that's redundant, could just say what your party tells you to think.

And you dutifully obey like some sort of mindless automaton, nary a shred of reason and logic in your head and a seeming gross lack of human decency and compassion.
Even the kids I'm grooming are dying before I can groom them into females.
 
Bull-crap. Bottom line is the link I shared and following links clearly showed how they had banned the vaccine for those under 50 with some very small exceptions.

You were wrong and a liar.

I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes is a moot point regarding the substance of the post and the overriding point on how miserably ineffective the vaccines are and how dangerous.

There is a reason we see so many otherwise young and healthy people dropping like flies from things like heart disease, which is not common for healthy, young people, and it's buttholes like yourself that enabled such widespread slaughter of these innocent people, all so you can slavishly repeat what your thought masters in the media and democrat party, but hey, that's redundant, could just say what your party tells you to think.

And you dutifully obey like some sort of mindless automaton, nary a shred of reason and logic in your head and a seeming gross lack of human decency and compassion.
Man, you need help. Get it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heelmanwilm
You don’t have a good track record of winning your bets.

I don’t know who you’re talking about, but for me to pay, I have to either respect you or fear you. Needless to say, you don’t fit either.
I have a very good track record of PAYING my debts…deadbeat
 
Last edited:
Bull-crap. Bottom line is the link I shared and following links clearly showed how they had banned the vaccine for those under 50 with some very small exceptions.

You were wrong and a liar.

I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes is a moot point regarding the substance of the post and the overriding point on how miserably ineffective the vaccines are and how dangerous.

There is a reason we see so many otherwise young and healthy people dropping like flies from things like heart disease, which is not common for healthy, young people, and it's buttholes like yourself that enabled such widespread slaughter of these innocent people, all so you can slavishly repeat what your thought masters in the media and democrat party, but hey, that's redundant, could just say what your party tells you to think.

And you dutifully obey like some sort of mindless automaton, nary a shred of reason and logic in your head and a seeming gross lack of human decency and compassion.
Bahahahaha go fuk yourself liar. It is not illegal for the dutch under 50 to get a booster (nor the Danes for that matter). Being illegal means it would be a crime you flaming dipshyt and clearly to anyone capable
Of reading it’s not a crime to get a booster. Not in Netherlands nor Denmark. You’ve posted nothing to back that ridiculous pile of steaming shyt up. And you claimed it was the Dutch numerous times so don’t even bring that weak bull shyt about a typo. And I don’t give a fuking rats ass if you or anyone gets vaxxed. I just enjoy insulting your stupidity and lies over why you don’t. And boy is there a lot to keep me entertained.

@randman1

“I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes…”

okay then @randman1 let’s go to the tape….

@randman1
“Is the DUTCH government crazy MAGA people as well? They just banned the vaccine for almost everyone under 50. They now think it's better for most people to get Covid than to get the vaccine.”

@randman1
“As far as the DUTCH, I bet you 100k right now the DUTCH have made the vaccine illegal, banned, for some populations. I can back that bet. 100k. Put up or shut up.”

hahahahahahahahaha!!!!! I love it when you pious bigoted fascists make fools of yourselves. Pay up bitch
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: blazers
The only thing interesting here is the $1 million dollar award from Israeli Dan David foundation, right?

- He's making a massive salary, that was going to happen regardless of pandemic.
- Fed gov job comes along with great perks, those were going to happen regardless of pandemic
- His investments in general fund did really well in 2019,2020,2021 - so did everybody's. The market almost doubled Jan 19 to Jan 21, his being concerned with the pandemic didn't "pump" the general stock market.
-- Your link says "broadly targeted mutual funds, no reported holdings of individual stocks"

The obsession with Fauci has been a weird one.
 
Bahahahaha go fuk yourself liar. It is not illegal for the dutch under 50 to get a booster (nor the Danes for that matter). Being illegal means it would be a crime you flaming dipshyt and clearly to anyone capable
Of reading it’s not a crime to get a booster. Not in Netherlands nor Denmark. You’ve posted nothing to back that ridiculous pile of steaming shyt up. And you claimed it was the Dutch numerous times so don’t even bring that weak bull shyt about a typo. And I don’t give a fuking rats ass if you or anyone gets vaxxed. I just enjoy insulting your stupidity and lies over why you don’t. And boy is there a lot to keep me entertained.

@randman1

“I suspect if you go back and look at both threads which this was posted on, I wouldn't even be surprised if the first one to bring up Dutch was one of your cohorts. You can go and check but regardless, accidentally typing Dutch instead of Danes…”

okay then @randman1 let’s go to the tape….

@randman1
“Is the DUTCH government crazy MAGA people as well? They just banned the vaccine for almost everyone under 50. They now think it's better for most people to get Covid than to get the vaccine.”

@randman1
“As far as the DUTCH, I bet you 100k right now the DUTCH have made the vaccine illegal, banned, for some populations. I can back that bet. 100k. Put up or shut up.”

hahahahahahahahaha!!!!! I love it when you pious bigoted fascists make fools of yourselves. Pay up bitch
It is a crime actually. Maybe you don't understand regulations.
 
The only thing interesting here is the $1 million dollar award from Israeli Dan David foundation, right?

- He's making a massive salary, that was going to happen regardless of pandemic.
- Fed gov job comes along with great perks, those were going to happen regardless of pandemic
- His investments in general fund did really well in 2019,2020,2021 - so did everybody's. The market almost doubled Jan 19 to Jan 21, his being concerned with the pandemic didn't "pump" the general stock market.
-- Your link says "broadly targeted mutual funds, no reported holdings of individual stocks"

The obsession with Fauci has been a weird one.
Why won't he release how much he's making on Covid vax patents?

Bottom line is anyone paying attention can see exactly what the agenda is. They (Fauci, Biden, the globalists, Davos folks, Gates, etc,..) aren't really hiding it that much.

Started a new thread quoting Biden's executive order. Here's what it says.

"It is the policy of my Administration to coordinate a whole-of-government approach to advance biotechnology and biomanufacturing .....

For biotechnology and biomanufacturing to help us achieve our societal goals, the United States needs to invest in foundational scientific capabilities. We need to develop genetic engineering technologies and techniques to be able to write circuitry for cells and predictably program biology in the same way in which we write software and program computers"

"Same way" as we do with computers. Been saying this for awhile now but hey, they officially announced it in an Executive Order.

Think Monsanto with seeds. Monsanto owns the patent for those genetic alterations and so they own the seeds themselves.

 
No it’s not a crime. You don’t understand what “illegal” means. Shocking i know that we get to add another thing to the mountain of stuff you’re fuking clueless about.

You havw no idea what you are talking about. The vaccine is unavailable, not offered, not approved, for general use of those under 50. So a doctor cannot administer that without breaking the regulation; hence it being illegal.
 
You havw no idea what you are talking about. The vaccine is unavailable, not offered, not approved, for general use of those under 50. So a doctor cannot administer that without breaking the regulation; hence it being illegal.
You guys got to dig deeper or put this one on the shelf. Presumptively, they have something equivalent to our process where drugs (that are on a list as not over the counter or "herbal" in nature) have to be authorized for administration/prescription. That document would lay out the limits of what is or isn't authorized and for whom. Then you'd have to find the statute(s) or other prohibition for administering or prescribing something not on their approved list, etc. Only then can it be determined what is legal or illegal in their country.

Media reports of what the newest guidance is or isn't will not cut it. Until you have the authorization of use language, you'll never actually know because there could very well be language that allows doctors the individual authority to prescribe it in any given circumstance at their discretion - which pretty much opens it up to anybody.
 
You guys got to dig deeper or put this one on the shelf. Presumptively, they have something equivalent to our process where drugs (that are on a list as not over the counter or "herbal" in nature) have to be authorized for administration/prescription. That document would lay out the limits of what is or isn't authorized and for whom. Then you'd have to find the statute(s) or other prohibition for administering or prescribing something not on their approved list, etc. Only then can it be determined what is legal or illegal in their country.

Media reports of what the newest guidance is or isn't will not cut it. Until you have the authorization of use language, you'll never actually know because there could very well be language that allows doctors the individual authority to prescribe it in any given circumstance at their discretion - which pretty much opens it up to anybody.
Here's the law. It is illegal to dispense the vaccines outside of the guidance and approval rules.

 
You havw no idea what you are talking about. The vaccine is unavailable, not offered, not approved, for general use of those under 50, except for people aged under 50 who are at a higher risk of becoming severely ill, work with people at risk or are relatives of people at risk. So a doctor cannot administer that without breaking the regulation; hence it being illegal, unless the caveats above apply.
FIFY, see screenshot below.

This is from danish website, not dutch though...


under.png
 
FIFY, see screenshot below.

This is from danish website, not dutch though...


under.png
You think I'm going to believe you? Your DNA and everything is already been scrambled and reprogrammed like Microsoft.
 
You havw no idea what you are talking about. The vaccine is unavailable, not offered, not approved, for general use of those under 50. So a doctor cannot administer that without breaking the regulation; hence it being illegal.
Bullshit. They’re not offering it to people under 50 because they simply don’t see any benefit given who’s at risk. It’s not a regulation. It’s not illegal. You’re a fuking idiot.
 
Bullshit. They’re not offering it to people under 50 because they simply don’t see any benefit given who’s at risk. It’s not a regulation. It’s not illegal. You’re a fuking idiot.
Not offering makes it illegal to dispense it for those who are excluded. Not sure why you can't get your head around that.
 
Here's the law. It is illegal to dispense the vaccines outside of the guidance and approval rules.

While I appreciate the light reading of the Danish Medicines Act, it's the other half of the equation that you need. Basically, this is what I expected and what I meant when I was drawing the analogy to our own system. They've got a procedure in place that oversees all medicines/drugs and that's what you attached. It's got a ton of references to what the "Minister" and "Agency" can do in any given situation.

You need the newest version of what I think we called the Special Use Authorization. ( @blazers help me out on the name or our equivalent - you're usually up to date on this stuff.) If you don't have that document, you can't determine what they are allowed to do or not allowed to do.
 
They’re not offering it to people under 50 because they simply don’t see any benefit given who’s at risk.
And this is the critical point of the change from previous recommendations. This doesn't mean that they can or can't in any given situation where a person and their doctor determine it would be beneficial. That goes back to the actual revised language.
 
  • Like
Reactions: heelmanwilm
While I appreciate the light reading of the Danish Medicines Act, it's the other half of the equation that you need. Basically, this is what I expected and what I meant when I was drawing the analogy to our own system. They've got a procedure in place that oversees all medicines/drugs and that's what you attached. It's got a ton of references to what the "Minister" and "Agency" can do in any given situation.

You need the newest version of what I think we called the Special Use Authorization. ( @blazers help me out on the name or our equivalent - you're usually up to date on this stuff.) If you don't have that document, you can't determine what they are allowed to do or not allowed to do.
i got nothing, just their official website screenshotted above which says plenty of people under 50 will be offered the vaccine/booster.

The kicker is that the Danes involves the term "higher risk" and the Danish are WAY more healthy than the average American.
 
And this is the critical point of the change from previous recommendations. This doesn't mean that they can or can't in any given situation where a person and their doctor determine it would be beneficial. That goes back to the actual revised language.
The kicker is that the Danes involves the term "higher risk" and the Danish are WAY more healthy than the average American.
 
While I appreciate the light reading of the Danish Medicines Act, it's the other half of the equation that you need. Basically, this is what I expected and what I meant when I was drawing the analogy to our own system. They've got a procedure in place that oversees all medicines/drugs and that's what you attached. It's got a ton of references to what the "Minister" and "Agency" can do in any given situation.

You need the newest version of what I think we called the Special Use Authorization. ( @blazers help me out on the name or our equivalent - you're usually up to date on this stuff.) If you don't have that document, you can't determine what they are allowed to do or not allowed to do.
Ok. For me, the published stuff from them suffices to answer definitely but you are saying it's possible there is another overriding rule.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT