Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So one thing I need to make clear... 100% MJ's execution in the final 2 minutes are superior, and probably significantly superior, to LeBron.Posted this in the other thread SJung but let's be real
One thing is for sure, MJ doesn't lose that game in the same situation.
Up 2 at home with the ball under a minute left, can't be stopped going to the basket and passes it to Kyle fkin Korver. Gives up the go ahead 3 in his grill and proceeds to get the ball stripped and stolen on a potential game tying shot IIRC.
If you thought Kyrie was more valuable in that game to the Cavs and better than LeBron, I'm sorry you're just wrong. Kyrie had a brilliant 3rd quarter but his overall game wasn't great IMO.Kyrie was the stud of the gm for the cavs jung. Just like in gms 3,4,5 last yr kyrie carried that team. Tonight it wasn't enough. Warriors are giving lebron the first half where he is getting most his numbers. He's been very pedestrian In the second half of every game this series, when they need him the most.
And I agree w the poster above. Mj grabs that game by the throat. Bron missed about 6 layups in the second half even with the benefit of the 3-4 step no dribble rule he's allowed to play under. Those killed his team along with his giving up the ball to 3 point shooters as opposed to finishing the drives.
So one thing I need to make clear... 100% MJ's execution in the final 2 minutes are superior, and probably significantly superior, to LeBron.
Honestly, I would take LeBron in the first 45 minutes over anyone in the NBA. I would take MJ and maybe a handful of guys (including Kobe and Durant) over LeBron in the final 2 minutes. Now how much you value the final 2 minutes of a NBA game over the first 46 is up to you and it's a really subjective debate. I probably value it less than the people who think that the 4th quarter is the only quarter that matters in the NBA. But again, that's up to you.
On the pass to Kyle Korver... You can disagree with it. That's fine. But if he makes it, we probably call it the right basketball play. IMO, Korver has to make that shot. Korver's in the NBA because he nails that shot. Korver got acquired by the Cavs to make that shot.
Does MJ lose a game like that? I don't know. The only equivalent I can think of is does MJ lose to the Suns in the game where John Paxson hit the go ahead 3? Almost certainly the Bulls lose that game.
Does MJ lose if Kerr misses the mid range J against the Jazz? Maybe. Game would be tied at that point and the Jazz likely have the ball on the final possession with a chance to win the game.
If you weren't going to have a negative reaction to LeBron's pass even if Korver made the shot, then it was the right basketball play and to criticize LeBron on that pass IMO isn't fair.
Again, I don't think LeBron handled the final minute well at all. But Korver needs to make that shot and Kyrie went dribble dribble dribble dribble, step-back 3 against an elite 6'7" defender in a situation he could and should have gotten a 2-for-1, but milked the clock too far.
The Cavs as a team were horrendous down the stretch. LeBron deserves some of the blame, but the entire team on the floor deserves all of it.
I'll take LeBron because he's bigger, faster, stronger. I think he's a better rebounder. I think he's a better passer. Defensively, I think they're about equal. LeBron is more versatile defensively, but MJ was the superior on the ball defender. So with all those things, I don't think it's a stretch to say LeBron is the better basketball player apart from finishing the game and he isn't as gifted a scorer as MJ. But LeBron may end up being the NBA's all time leader in scoring and that's not even his greatest skill.So, MJ is only better than Lebron for TWO minutes per game, in the NBA Finals...?. You sir are either drinking heavily or completely clueless. Lebron will be 3-5 in NBA Finals after Friday night. MJ was/is SIX for SIX in the championship series. Lebron is on the decline, IMO. He will never become the best player of all-time. That ship will officially sail into the sunset on Friday night as well. Time to find another horse to ride. The Ohio Derby is almost over...!
I'll take LeBron because he's bigger, faster, stronger. I think he's a better rebounder. I think he's a better passer. Defensively, I think they're about equal. LeBron is more versatile defensively, but MJ was the superior on the ball defender.
That's an awful lot of defending you're doing or bron and I'll stick by what I said-kyrie won that series for them last year in games 3,4,5 where he was the best player on the court. Per usual bron drifted in the 2nd half last night after getting all his stats in the first half. He did in fact miss 4 or 5 gimme layups which you choose to minimize-those were huge and borderline choke artist type misses. If that was anyone else on the cavs you'd be ranting and using them as examples of "how little help" poor bron doesn't have.
I'm not gonna get into the "only times you'd take mj is in the last two minutes" and you somehow thinking he's even in the same stratosphere as mj defensively. Both those statements continue to show me you've never really seen Jordan play. You continue to minimize the fact that he's been pedestrian in the second half this whole series. im sorry-blowing layups and giving up the ball in crunch time two feet from the basket is not the mark of all time greatness. You can sit and defend the pass to Korver all you want but it wasn't the only time first of all and secondly almost everyone watching knew it was the wrong play.
I'll take LeBron because he's bigger, faster, stronger. I think he's a better rebounder. I think he's a better passer. Defensively, I think they're about equal. LeBron is more versatile defensively, but MJ was the superior on the ball defender. So with all those things, I don't think it's a stretch to say LeBron is the better basketball player apart from finishing the game and he isn't as gifted a scorer as MJ. But LeBron may end up being the NBA's all time leader in scoring and that's not even his greatest skill.
As you probably know by now, I'm not a ring counter when it comes to this argument of player's legacies and place in NBA history. MJ never lost in the finals, he lost 3 times in the first round. Do those losses just not matter because he's Michael Jordan? LeBron's never lost in the first round... Does that becomes irrelevant because he isn't Michael Jordan? This is how much I'm not a ring counter... Chris Paul is better than Kyrie and will be all time better than Kyrie even if CP3 finishes with 0 rings. If Kyrie finished with 3 rings but is the exact same PG he is now, I'll still say Jason Kidd is a better all time PG despite having only 1 ring. I'll still say CP3 is a better PG if he finished with 0 rings. Why? Because Jason Kidd and CP3 are better basketball players than Kyrie.
And of course LeBron is on the decline... LeBron's already played in more career regular season minutes than Jordan played his entire career and didn't take 2 years off like MJ.
Will LeBron become the best player of all time in most eyes? No he won't. And to a large degree I think that's fair. LeBron's epic failure against the Mavs is something that he will never escape and he shouldn't be able to escape it. And if LeBron hypothetically wins 2 more rings, then the fact that he has 5 and is 1 short of MJ due to his failure against Dallas won't sit well with everyone. And again, I completely understand that argument. MJ never failed on the biggest stage. LeBron has.
But the book on LeBron isn't done yet. And one thing with generationally great players is it's usually premature to count them out before their bodies physically break to the point where they're no longer a competitive player.
I remember a time when Kobe divorced from Shaq and was missing the playoffs or getting eliminated in the first round for a few years. There were a lot of people wondering if Kobe would ever win. Then the Lakers traded for Pau Gasol, and boom, 3 finals appearances, 2 titles followed.
Hell, I thought the Spurs were done after the Heat beat them in 2013. Nope, they weren't close to being done.
I'm not going to count out LeBron. Hell, he already did the impossible and won a title for Cleveland. If he already did that, why the hell should I count him out?
If you thought Kyrie was more valuable in that game to the Cavs and better than LeBron, I'm sorry you're just wrong. Kyrie had a brilliant 3rd quarter but his overall game wasn't great IMO.
Don't get caught in Kyrie aesthetics as a player. He's eye candy, but far fewer significant substance.
So one thing I need to make clear... 100% MJ's execution in the final 2 minutes are superior, and probably significantly superior, to LeBron.
Honestly, I would take LeBron in the first 45 minutes over anyone in the NBA. I would take MJ and maybe a handful of guys (including Kobe and Durant) over LeBron in the final 2 minutes. Now how much you value the final 2 minutes of a NBA game over the first 46 is up to you and it's a really subjective debate. I probably value it less than the people who think that the 4th quarter is the only quarter that matters in the NBA. But again, that's up to you.
That's fine... I'll disagree, but if that's what you think it's very clear why MJ is very much ahead of LeBron to you.Well count me as one that believes the only meaningful quarter of an NBA game is the 4th and yes, to me, the last 2 minutes are when the real play occurs. NBA players generally go through the motions up until that point.
In regards to your comment about Mike being better in the last 2 minutes, that's a forgone conclusion. There's never been a better closer. Ever. The problem with LeBron is that he doesn't have a signature move. Mike could go into the post and hit the turnaround fadeaway and was money. LeBron doesn't have that. His best scoring move is to have a full head of steam going to the basket. You can't always do that in the last 2 minutes and without it, LeBron then has to decide if he's going to shoot a jumper or pass to a guy that's a better jump shooter. As you see, he often elects for the latter rather than the former.
Lastly, I also don't agree that LeBron is an equal defender to Mike. Jordan took over games defensively at times. I've not seen LeBron do that. But then again, defense is played completely different these days.
I disagree (of course I would)... For the record, LeBron is playing for a coach that sat the best 3 point shooter in the NBA when the Cavs were down 3 late and subbed in Tristian Thompson. These are the bone-headed coaches LeBron's been playing for in all but 4 years in his career.Swap out Jordan with Lebron on those Bulls teams, and the Bulls maybe win 2 titles, not 6.
I disagree (of course I would)... For the record, LeBron is playing for a coach that sat the best 3 point shooter in the NBA when the Cavs were down 3 late and subbed in Tristian Thompson. These are the bone-headed coaches LeBron's been playing for in all but 4 years in his career.
If you said LeBron would win a couple less, I don't think I would blink an eye. I would just disagree... But I disagree firmly that LeBron is 33% the player MJ is in terms of RINGZ culture.
The other thing no one is bringing up here (and no one will)...KD joined a team that already had 3 all stars...and one of those all stars took over the 1st quarter last allowing KD to chill....I am not knocking KD but the reality of it is where was this KD last year when the Warriors handed it to them? Put Bron on the Warriors team and this convo would probably be about him! These guys changing teams and looking to hook up with other all stars in order to win a ring.....MJ had none of that BS...he made the players around him better and made Pip an all star....to even begin to compare MJ and these guys is a ludicrous arguement!!
I'll take LeBron because he's bigger, faster, stronger. I think he's a better rebounder. I think he's a better passer. Defensively, I think they're about equal. LeBron is more versatile defensively, but MJ was the superior on the ball defender. So with all those things, I don't think it's a stretch to say LeBron is the better basketball player apart from finishing the game and he isn't as gifted a scorer as MJ. But LeBron may end up being the NBA's all time leader in scoring and that's not even his greatest skill.
As you probably know by now, I'm not a ring counter when it comes to this argument of player's legacies and place in NBA history. MJ never lost in the finals, he lost 3 times in the first round. Do those losses just not matter because he's Michael Jordan? LeBron's never lost in the first round... Does that becomes irrelevant because he isn't Michael Jordan? This is how much I'm not a ring counter... Chris Paul is better than Kyrie and will be all time better than Kyrie even if CP3 finishes with 0 rings. If Kyrie finished with 3 rings but is the exact same PG he is now, I'll still say Jason Kidd is a better all time PG despite having only 1 ring. I'll still say CP3 is a better PG if he finished with 0 rings. Why? Because Jason Kidd and CP3 are better basketball players than Kyrie.
And of course LeBron is on the decline... LeBron's already played in more career regular season minutes than Jordan played his entire career and didn't take 2 years off like MJ.
Will LeBron become the best player of all time in most eyes? No he won't. And to a large degree I think that's fair. LeBron's epic failure against the Mavs is something that he will never escape and he shouldn't be able to escape it. And if LeBron hypothetically wins 2 more rings, then the fact that he has 5 and is 1 short of MJ due to his failure against Dallas won't sit well with everyone. And again, I completely understand that argument. MJ never failed on the biggest stage. LeBron has.
But the book on LeBron isn't done yet. And one thing with generationally great players is it's usually premature to count them out before their bodies physically break to the point where they're no longer a competitive player.
I remember a time when Kobe divorced from Shaq and was missing the playoffs or getting eliminated in the first round for a few years. There were a lot of people wondering if Kobe would ever win. Then the Lakers traded for Pau Gasol, and boom, 3 finals appearances, 2 titles followed.
Hell, I thought the Spurs were done after the Heat beat them in 2013. Nope, they weren't close to being done.
I'm not going to count out LeBron. Hell, he already did the impossible and won a title for Cleveland. If he already did that, why the hell should I count him out?
I'll take LeBron because he's bigger, faster, stronger. I think he's a better rebounder. I think he's a better passer. Defensively, I think they're about equal. LeBron is more versatile defensively, but MJ was the superior on the ball defender. So with all those things, I don't think it's a stretch to say LeBron is the better basketball player apart from finishing the game and he isn't as gifted a scorer as MJ. But LeBron may end up being the NBA's all time leader in scoring and that's not even his greatest skill.
As you probably know by now, I'm not a ring counter when it comes to this argument of player's legacies and place in NBA history. MJ never lost in the finals, he lost 3 times in the first round. Do those losses just not matter because he's Michael Jordan? LeBron's never lost in the first round... Does that becomes irrelevant because he isn't Michael Jordan? This is how much I'm not a ring counter... Chris Paul is better than Kyrie and will be all time better than Kyrie even if CP3 finishes with 0 rings. If Kyrie finished with 3 rings but is the exact same PG he is now, I'll still say Jason Kidd is a better all time PG despite having only 1 ring. I'll still say CP3 is a better PG if he finished with 0 rings. Why? Because Jason Kidd and CP3 are better basketball players than Kyrie.
And of course LeBron is on the decline... LeBron's already played in more career regular season minutes than Jordan played his entire career and didn't take 2 years off like MJ.
Will LeBron become the best player of all time in most eyes? No he won't. And to a large degree I think that's fair. LeBron's epic failure against the Mavs is something that he will never escape and he shouldn't be able to escape it. And if LeBron hypothetically wins 2 more rings, then the fact that he has 5 and is 1 short of MJ due to his failure against Dallas won't sit well with everyone. And again, I completely understand that argument. MJ never failed on the biggest stage. LeBron has.
But the book on LeBron isn't done yet. And one thing with generationally great players is it's usually premature to count them out before their bodies physically break to the point where they're no longer a competitive player.
I remember a time when Kobe divorced from Shaq and was missing the playoffs or getting eliminated in the first round for a few years. There were a lot of people wondering if Kobe would ever win. Then the Lakers traded for Pau Gasol, and boom, 3 finals appearances, 2 titles followed.
Hell, I thought the Spurs were done after the Heat beat them in 2013. Nope, they weren't close to being done.
I'm not going to count out LeBron. Hell, he already did the impossible and won a title for Cleveland. If he already did that, why the hell should I count him out?
If you weren't going to have a negative reaction to LeBron's pass even if Korver made the shot, then it was the right basketball play and to criticize LeBron on that pass IMO isn't fair.
Kyrie sprints up court (for no reason), kicks it out to Iman Shumpert, who also dumbly shoots and misses a 3...
That was your "stud of the game."
Because Jason Kidd [is a] better basketball players than Kyrie.
I disagree (of course I would)... For the record, LeBron is playing for a coach that sat the best 3 point shooter in the NBA when the Cavs were down 3 late and subbed in Tristian Thompson. These are the bone-headed coaches LeBron's been playing for in all but 4 years in his career.
If you said LeBron would win a couple less, I don't think I would blink an eye. I would just disagree... But I disagree firmly that LeBron is 33% the player MJ is in terms of RINGZ culture.
For the record, LeBron is playing for a coach that sat the best 3 point shooter in the NBA when the Cavs were down 3 late and subbed in Tristian Thompson. These are the bone-headed coaches LeBron's been playing for in all but 4 years in his career.
You're comparing Korver and Shumpert as shooters? Ironic GIF you just posted then.
Yea. Hand picked Spoelstra over Pat Riley. He hand picked Mike Brown? Wtf? I guess you can say he handpicked Lue even though no one has come to the defense of David Blatt.These are the coaches that LeBron hand picks, because they'll run what LeBron wants them to run. Any coach that wants to actually draw up his own plays gets the ax from LBJ.
He will end up playing in LA. Worst kept secret in the NBA right now.I am not surprised that you would not want to count rings in your already out of mind logic. That seems to solidly be because Lebron can not finish with enough rings to further enchant your POV. Look, you seem to be somewhat intelligent at times. However, your love for all things bron-bron is a bit clueless, in the final analysis. Give it a break. Well, just give it a rest. No, instead please give it a free ride to Akron. Your king, will always have at least one ring there, even if it is from the bottom of an empty beer mug. He can also find a used crown there as well, I feel certain. Used Crown Vic's are still all the rage. The bottom of your glass is empty. So is Lebrons ring chest for yet another blown year. How many more will it now take? The arguing is officially almost over for good. The next time that Lebron loses your powerless thinking will go out with the Cleveland sunset. Can't imagine anything more beautiful right this second. I have but one Final question?Where will he run to next?
No... I just think Kyrie isn't as good as Jason Kidd.Before jungs finished kyrie and love will be relegated to the d league.
He will end up playing in LA. Worst kept secret in the NBA right now.
You just called Durant the best player in the game... If LeBron's a quitter for going back to Cleveland.... What does that make Durant?Worst of all he is a quitter as well, according to your post.?! Wow, just Wow...
By "sitting the best 3 pt shooter in the NBA", are you REALLY referring to Kyle Korver. Whoa that is hilarious!I disagree (of course I would)... For the record, LeBron is playing for a coach that sat the best 3 point shooter in the NBA when the Cavs were down 3 late and subbed in Tristian Thompson. These are the bone-headed coaches LeBron's been playing for in all but 4 years in his career.
If you said LeBron would win a couple less, I don't think I would blink an eye. I would just disagree... But I disagree firmly that LeBron is 33% the player MJ is in terms of RINGZ culture.
That's an awful lot of defending you're doing or bron and I'll stick by what I said-kyrie won that series for them last year in games 3,4,5 where he was the best player on the court. Per usual bron drifted in the 2nd half last night after getting all his stats in the first half. He did in fact miss 4 or 5 gimme layups which you choose to minimize-those were huge and borderline choke artist type misses. If that was anyone else on the cavs you'd be ranting and using them as examples of "how little help" poor bron doesn't have.
I'm not gonna get into the "only times you'd take mj is in the last two minutes" and you somehow thinking he's even in the same stratosphere as mj defensively. Both those statements continue to show me you've never really seen Jordan play. You continue to minimize the fact that he's been pedestrian in the second half this whole series. im sorry-blowing layups and giving up the ball in crunch time two feet from the basket is not the mark of all time greatness. You can sit and defend the pass to Korver all you want but it wasn't the only time first of all and secondly almost everyone watching knew it was the wrong play.