Oh, brother. So now you're a nuclear arms expert? A know-it-all on the matter of what you not-so-intelligently refer to as "the nuclear thing"?!?! What a pretentious dumbass!! You're as proficient at slinging poop as poopslinger himself.
if you're skeptical of the media, as anyone with half a brain should be at this point, how do you know that the Ukrainians just won themselves a major victory? No environment is richer in propaganda than a war environment, unless it's a democrat election campaign, and the media can be counted on to accurately report what is known about as much as you can count on me to keep my opinions to myself.
lol, your butthurt over being outed as a blatant liar is beyond obvious. You're too oblivious to get that your petty little spitballs project your deep insecurity.
maybe you should first give an example of Trump being Putin's errand boy, you disingenuous jerk. Include substantiation please.
It's better to arm them and give them intelligence. Let them fight the fight because that's cheaper. I can assure you that the defense industry would be happier if we were actually fighting. And if we don't help Ukraine at all, we'll definitely be fighting Russia because they wouldn't stop.
so then, you did see it, but then....did you?. It was leaked as being discussed privately. If it was discussed privately, why was this supposedly private conversation made public by leaking it? I guess you see that irony, and my point was that if you didn't see the irony it was because you didn't want to....a key characteristic of the knee-jerk liberal. But then you add that last sentence which makes no sense at all so I have no idea what you took from this.
You are really messed up. First, Trump offered and delivered lethal aid. Obama withheld it. So you are lying or just misinformed or both.
What about the civilians, women and children even that will be bombed?
www.lifesitenews.com
Except Russia could if it wants, totally reverse that victory by simply taking down their ower grid like we did with Serbia.
I already indicated that I accept this with a high degree of probability, so what's your point? I buy nothing 100% and anyone who does is just naive, even in an atmosphere of greater trust in the media.
LifeSiteNews is a Canadian Catholic conservative to far-right anti-abortion advocacy website and news publication. LifeSiteNews has published misleading information and conspiracy theories, and in 2021, was banned from some social media platforms for spreading COVID-19 misinformation.The DOJ and FBI really are like the Gestapo and lawless.
"
The warrant charged Mark with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, due to a claimed “ATTACK OF A PATIENT ESCORT.”
Ryan-Marie stated this charge comes from an incident that had already been thrown out of the District Court in Philadelphia but was somehow picked up by Merrick Garland’s Department of Justice.
On several occasions when Mark went to sidewalk counsel last year, he took his eldest son, who was only 12 at the time, she explained. For “weeks and weeks,” a “pro-abortion protester” would speak to the boy saying “crude … inappropriate and disgusting things,” such as “you’re dad’s a fag,” and other statements that were too vulgar for her to convey.
Repeatedly, Mark would tell this pro-abortion man that he did not have permission to speak to his son and please refrain from doing so. And “he kept doing it and kind of came into [the son’s] personal space” obscenely ridiculing his father. At this point, “Mark shoved him away from his child, and the guy fell back.”
“He didn’t have any injuries or anything, but he tried to sue Mark,” and the case was thrown out of court in the early summer."
FBI raids home of Catholic pro-life speaker, author with guns drawn as his terrified kids watch - LifeSite
‘The kids were all just screaming. It was all just very scary and traumatic,’ Ryan-Marie Houck described.
So you just repeat known liars who smear legit news. Not surprised. No facts on your side. Just smears.
nationalfile.com
www.theblaze.com
All of them. Everyone has their audience and their agenda. Everyone.
That you would use the NYT as an example proves the point. They are no longer (if they ever were) the pinnacle of trustworthy neutrality about anything. See the entire Hunter Biden laptop fiasco as just one example of how their political agenda made them get something pretty major 100% wrong. I cannot say whether it was purposeful or just influenced by how they see and want things, but they still got it wrong.
this is flat out bullwhip-worthy, if it isn't some photoshop deal...and if it is, it's a damn good job and if it is, whoever put it out there needs a few lashes. It does not look like a photoshop job. Posters here accuse me of being angry when when in fact I'm grinning like a possum. But I'm not smiling now, I'm genuinely pissed.. Somebody needs a good ass-kicking and then some.
has that guy been bullying you? Sorry, I'm not going to kick his ass for you. Doesn't your mom normally take care of that kind of stuff?
what kills me is that even if they don't like it, even if they detest it, they won't oppose it.
We know you're familiar with smelling Trump's ass. You seem to also know a lot about Trump's pecker. But you don't know mine, that's just wishful thinking on your part.Another thing you and Trump seem to have in common.
I don't necessarily disagree, but I don't think the drag queen is who encouraged those girls. I think an entire mindset needs its ass kicked.
Yep and may even defend it by pretending it's just a conspiracy theory or some such BS. They are the Groomer party.
It's just par for the course. Time to wake up and though you detest the messenger, the dems are the groomer party, up and down. It's systemic and a core part of their new woke identity and agenda.
Ok, but drag is being explicitly marketed to kids, and kids are encouraged to participate in drag such as the 11 year old drag boy that performed sexually with grown men throwing money at them.
One incident? Guess you aren't paying attention.
problem NOT solved. You think saying 'drag isn't for kids' solves anything? This is what we keep trying to get through to you. We don't give a shit that there are people who for whatever reason want to be like whatever they want to be. I can't tell you not to be yourself because then I lose the right to require that you allow me to be MYself. That part isn't an issue. at all. No one is being thrown into a fiery pit because others like them behaved inappropriately.
Why do you care if a boy wants to dress-up like a girl??? Look at the outrageous costumes the RCC wears!!!
are you a 'minor-attracted person'? I'm not and I think most people are not. Otherwise, I don't care how outrageous are the costumes worn at some community college.
You guys swim around in this far-right conspiracy illusion bowl. Enjoy yourself.
