Source? Now I know your ass is familiar with trailer parks but that doesnt tell me much
OOTB's Political Thread . ..
- Thread starter BillyL
- Start date
Source? Now I know your ass is familiar with trailer parks but that doesnt tell me much
I ain’t your secretary. If you dispute what I’m saying then prove it. If you want me to add “poor” then fine…..inner city black POOR communities have higher rates of crime, broken families, and addiction. Is that better?
Either it's an embarrassment and evidence of incompetence led by this current administration or it was purposeful. Take your pick.
If you don't speak in Insta-ebonics, he won't get it.
Weird take??? You suggested that people should not vote for Trump because he is allegedly supported by and will receive votes from hardcore Nazis and Klan members (which has absolutely no relationship to Trump's actual stance on those things). I simply responded with an equally abhorrent group of supporters for your illustrious party so you'd see the stupidity of your line of argument. You didn't. So, I'll ask your question right back:
When did any political party support legalization of Nazi principles and KKK principles? (Well, I know the answer to at least one of them).
I don’t deny there was incompetence. In fact I was the very first person in here to post as much. There’s no excuse for allowing roof top access with eye line sight of trump. None. As for it being “intentional”….
They didn’t offer message board poasting etiquette at unc in the 80’s.
If you think the BDS movement is just about boycotting then you aren't paying attention. But I'm going to leave this argument to you and @gunslingerdick since you both hate the Jews.
You know Trailer Parks, I'll give you that.
I hate the joos with the funny hair cuts and top hats.
Actually, I have attended them. Mostly state level because the national types tend to skip MD because our paltry amount of electoral votes don't matter and it's always a guaranteed D state since we have a two to one registration ratio. But to answer your question more specifically, the first one I attended was for Jimmy Carter in 1976 at my local shopping center. I actually got to shake his hand that day.
And you almost got it correct. The invite/rsvp/id thing is absolutely about control. It's not about controlling access to the person because once you get over the first hundred or two, very few are getting actual access. But it does control the makeup and nature of the crowd. If only invited people come, known supporters, you're never gonna get any protestors interrupting things. You're never gonna get people yelling inconvenient questions and so forth. This is all a beautiful movie being produced.
One last thing and I admit up front that I could be completely ill informed on this. Where has it been reported or shown that the trump shooter went through any actual checkpoint? He was observed, but how could someone with a rangefinder not be detained or turned away? I know he was observed to have one, and they were trying to track him (and lost him), but I thought that was someone who was "glassing" or on a "post" where he walked by. It's not like he was running and using hidden tunnels or something. He'd be easy to follow if they were actually following him. Like I say, might have missed it, but I'd like to know either way. Thanks.
Maybe. I was so distracted by the blacks around me I couldnt say for sure. Not the bball team blacks…just regular blacks. Like from carrboro.
I love the Jews. I have a couple Jew family members.
But you know what I support? Whoever can benefit America the most. If that's the Jews, then so be it. I'm not for sending them money but I'm also not for standing in the way of them opening up a can of whoop-ass on whoever wants a piece.
Oh we already know you think the basketball team are “some of the good ones”
Well admittedly I’m just going by what was testified to by the ss at the congressional hearings. Yes being invite only excludes negative elements at the rally in question but I’ve seen numerous instances of protestors interrupting her at other rallies. As for producing a movie…well….DUHHH!!!! That’s what a campaign does. They present an image. Why? CAUSE IT WORKS. Do I need you to point that out to me? No.
Last edited:
I’ve never understood sending them money. We know they’re all finance experts and rich.
Except that's part of the rhetoric and a lie. He didn't do that. He ordered a travel ban on certain countries, that went to the SCt and was upheld. Remember, it's what they do not what they say that actually matters.
So, he wants to stop terrorists from entering which are known to be based in certain countries (which included restrictions on those known Muslim hotbeds of North Korea and Venezuela, btw) or he wants to slow the spread of a 100 year virus (which also included another hotbed of the Muslim religion, lol).
And then we have the current D candidate, who has been the last person in the room influencing our president who has opened our borders to record numbers overall and a record number of terrorist incursions. And now she's a tough on the border prosecutor? You just keep flapping your gums junior, because
"Y'all bad at this."
“Whoever can benefit America the most”
But wants to close the border even though it’s practically unanimous among economists that migrant labor is a net benefit.
Its all about whoever can benefit America until someone has a little color huh?
Is that home video again? Hope you're getting royalties.
I admittedly didn't watch any of that besides highlighted clips. I mean, I'm only aware of the the head and the acting head testifying and I fully expected them to simply be in cya mode. They are politicians as well or they wouldn't be there. So, did they, or others, testify that Crooks went through an actual checkpoint and was not detained? Who did they blame for that? Or are you just putting two and two together based on the general type statements?
“Terrorist incursions” lol really reaching.
Those countries also have refugee’s, no? So the Iranian people are the danger and not the regime? How about the Yemeni minorities that were getting slaughtered by SA with American weapons? Or that Iraqis that actively worked with the US government.
So enlightened. Also, Trump called it the Muslim ban- my side didnt name it?
Also, the ban happened in 2017 trying to act like he did it for covid is ridiculous
Since when do we have open borders? Do you know what open borders means? Do you go through checkpoints when you go from MD to VA? Because thats what an open border looks like.
Since when have migrants not been a net benefit on the economy?
Sorry, man, but @bluetoe and I pretty much beat this to death yesterday. I don't think that debating the science behind concave mirrored surface really settles the question of Trump's AI theories about crowd size.
Wasting your time. Hes going to want you to go over why jet fuel can melt steel beams next.
He was stopped and searched (I assume at a checkpoint but maybe not) and they found a range finder but let him continue on. Why I don’t know. He was able to canvass the area days before and at some point had to have concealed his weapon.
But all this is splitting hairs on n irrelevant stuff. He tried to shoot trump. That was some scary shit and obviously it would be wise to look at security in light of that. It only makes sense to me that both campaigns would ramp up security in light of it. Did Harris specefically want invite only and id checks for security? I don’t know. But that makes the most sense.
MAGA is a bit of an extension of tea party, thru a strong-man authoritarian, rather than being just anti-Dem (or anti-Obama). The tea party grievances part will always be there. And it is easy for a populist message to reach people...
Are you saying I shouldn't believe everything that guy says? Who would have thought that?
"Sorry, man, but" I was busy with life yesterday when you were getting it wrong in your post. But that concept is mostly redundant. I could have just said your post.
So, for the sake of discussion, I'll concede that the crowd sizes and the incredible surge of support is all real. How do you explain it? How is it that the second most unelectable person who was considered an idiot by almost everyone prior to Joe's decision is now instead the second coming and the female version to the extent that her name should be Kamala Obama? I mean, how do you explain that a proposal that Trump stated as a policy position way back in June (pretty much poo pooed by the press) is now co-oopted by Kacula in one of her recent speeches and Newsweek presents it as her idea that is majority supported by R's in their poll?
Europe is having some "problems" because the left has ignored some issues on the "right" (primarily immigration issues). There are lessons to learn from them, and I think many strategists on both sides understand that.
It is blatantly obvious that there is a good chunk of voters in the middle (indies or whatever) that will be the ones who decide this election. Walz isn't considered moderate, but I think Kamala is going to be putting out a moderate message once the Dem convention votes her in because of this.
