all that needs to be said. Very nice.
does this start to smell dangerously familiar to you? I fear loan-qualifying being tinkered with again, given the bent of the socialist candidate.
No, because lower interest rates just means less of the mortgage payment going towards interest. Therefore they can borrow a higher amount but the payment stays the same. So the risk profile doesn’t change at all because the obligation is the same.
Same thing as down payment assistance programs. The amount borrowed doesn’t actually change, so the risk doesn’t change either. The issue (inflation) is when people end up spending more than they otherwise would be able to because they didn’t have to save that 30k to put down on a house.
I’m not a finance expert so someone else here may be able to explain it better but the MBS crisis was a lot more complex than that. Unqualified buyers defaulting on loans was the trigger, but the real issue was that risk being multiplied by financial institutions packaging those mortgages into a marketable security. Their gambling on the housing market produced liabilities that were many times larger than the actual obligations of the mortgages that were defaulted on. Once the default rate hit a certain level, the value of the securities was effectively zero and those banks and hedge funds had nothing of value to liquidate to stop the bleeding.
Also, none of the policies in question have anything to do with socialism. Price controls are not socialism. Subsidies are not socialism. The DNC is extremely cozy with Wall Street, capitalism isn’t going anywhere.